- Dec 12, 2017
- 26,015
- 12,460
You’re right. I’ll change that. Once a skater has possession of the puck the offside review shouldn’t be allowed.
You’re right. I’ll change that. Once a skater has possession of the puck the offside review shouldn’t be allowed.
And always such uplifting inspirational takes here, it's why I joined, twice!Never a dull moment
we all do, he gives marner so much space out there too to operate as well.I miss Auston![]()
I ignore most of the nonsense. I was just giving information.Put him on ignore already and let him yell into void
F*** thatSeriously even though it would suck for the Leafs, I would let that goal stand as a good goal. That was a good play by the Sens and I hate good plays that lead to goals being called back over a bare offside that you need video review to determine if it was an offside or not.
I've always said that they should call back goals for offsides only if it were blatant and not if a player was 'offside' by a couple of inches or something that you need to review a replay on a dozen times to see if that play was really offside. As a hockey fan IT SUCKS to see a good play leading to a goal and then having it get called back over a minor thing as a offside.
As someone who's seen our team get eliminated by goals that should not have been allowed, I'm good with the video reviewSeriously even though it would suck for the Leafs, I would let that goal stand as a good goal. That was a good play by the Sens and I hate good plays that lead to goals being called back over a bare offside that you need video review to determine if it was an offside or not.
I've always said that they should call back goals for offsides only if it were blatant and not if a player was 'offside' by a couple of inches or something that you need to review a replay on a dozen times to see if that play was really offside. As a hockey fan IT SUCKS to see a good play leading to a goal and then having it get called back over a minor thing as a offside.
Is it really this hard to score over 2 goals??? What the f*** are we Detroit, Buffalo???
Completely agree with you!Seriously even though it would suck for the Leafs, I would let that goal stand as a good goal. That was a good play by the Sens and I hate good plays that lead to goals being called back over a bare offside that you need video review to determine if it was an offside or not.
I've always said that they should call back goals for offsides only if it were blatant and not if a player was 'offside' by a couple of inches or something that you need to review a replay on a dozen times to see if that play was really offside. As a hockey fan IT SUCKS to see a good play leading to a goal and then having it get called back over a minor thing as a offside.
They won't have to. Just like their male counterparts, they will stand back and let the linesman do their job.I don't wanna be that guy.... but how are lady refs suppose to get in between guys throwing haymakers and pull them away?
or maybe that could be a way to reduce aggressive hockey when guys see women ref they will behave?
![]()
Small steady stepsMarner was at least engaged in the 2nd period; i saw him play body and take a few hits to make a play.
#improvements
He’s the least of their worries tonight.Marner looks great tonight. Flood gates are going to open soon.
Kase and Ritchie should switch lines
Play Kase - JT - Marner
Ritchie isn't working on that line
Marner looks great tonight. Flood gates are going to open soon.