Confirmed with Link: Senators are for sale - and it’s a Gong Show

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sun God Nika

Palestine 🇵🇸
Apr 22, 2013
20,257
8,662
Palestine 🇵🇸
in a city that is growing at 1.07%. which is the 3rd year in a row of decline. It has sharply declined since 2018. With all evidence suggesting that it will remain stable at 1%. With an economy that is still civil servant dependent. And has a low corporate base (Lowest among all Canadian major cities (hockey cities)). The Land the CTS sits on, is probably not all that desirable.

The Kanata/Stitsville boom, once anticipated is not happening. The sprawling metropolis that Ottawa was once predicted to be, is not. Even the city's own projections are for a 1.1% increase in growth (population and jobs) in the next 28 years. If any massive effort goes into refurbing inner core real-estate, it will mean taking away from suburban expansion.

The long and short; the CTC land has value, but nothing earth shattering.

It is literally right off the 417 tho.

You can get to the CTC in 16 mins if you were driving there from Downtown Ottawa right now. During game days and rush hour it is bad. But I can see a lot of people wanting to live in that area.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy

Crosside

Registered User
Aug 1, 2018
4,930
2,008
Too big and expensive to maintain.

I have no clue what they do with that Building and Land.
No I don’t ask if the B-Sens come to play here. I wonder if the group that gonna buy the Sens received the B-Sens and the Sensplex in the deal
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,343
13,654
No I don’t ask if the B-Sens come to play here. I wonder if the group that gonna buy the Sens received the B-Sens and the Sensplex in the deal
Sensplex is a P3 partnership if I remember correctly.
BSens likely part of it, that cost is a drop in The bucket in comparison
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crosside

DueDiligence

Registered User
Nov 16, 2013
8,760
5,124
Don't think he's doing this for attention or fandom - he's a businessman and this is a business proposal
Totally secondary. He's a Canadian who wants to own part of a hockey team in a place where he spent some of his youth. It's a personal thing.
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
That is just a silly notion. You really think a famous Hollywood actor, a Canadian who lived in Ottawa for a while and who is worth tens of millions of dollars would buy a stake in a pro hockey team as a short term investment??? Come on man!
Really reaching when he had to pivot to RR selling immediately based on pure skepticism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DueDiligence

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
in a city that is growing at 1.07%. which is the 3rd year in a row of decline. It has sharply declined since 2018. With all evidence suggesting that it will remain stable at 1%. With an economy that is still civil servant dependent. And has a low corporate base (Lowest among all Canadian major cities (hockey cities)). The Land the CTS sits on, is probably not all that desirable.

The Kanata/Stitsville boom, once anticipated is not happening. The sprawling metropolis that Ottawa was once predicted to be, is not. Even the city's own projections are for a 1.1% increase in growth (population and jobs) in the next 28 years. If any massive effort goes into refurbing inner core real-estate, it will mean taking away from suburban expansion.

The long and short; the CTC land has value, but nothing earth shattering.
The city if Ottawa was the second fastest growing city in Canada last year. They literally can't build houses fast enough. The projections are much much higher than that. Where did you get this misinformation?
 

IpsoPostFacto

No opinions, just reactions
Dec 17, 2017
889
955
Too many hockey fans equate things that are cool/trendy with somehow sullying the sport - like the hipsters of sports fans.

"Yeah, I'm a fan of a sports team - you've probably never heard of it though."
oh ya, well I'm so cool I listen to bands that haven't even formed yet.

*stolen from somewhere; I forget.
 

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
15,960
7,909
Totally secondary. He's a Canadian who wants to own part of a hockey team in a place where he spent some of his youth. It's a personal thing.

That's what we thought with Paul Anka too. If you've learned one thing from being a fan of celebrities, who they pretend to be on TV and who they are in real life is not real. Ryan Reynolds is character being played by Ryan Reynolds
 

Bileur

Registered User
Jun 15, 2004
18,801
7,670
Ottawa
That's what we thought with Paul Anka too. If you've learned one thing from being a fan of celebrities, who they pretend to be on TV and who they are in real life is not real. Ryan Reynolds is character being played by Ryan Reynolds

True but as far as I know Paul Anka didn’t have a recent history of purchasing a sport franchise and using it to create a television series. While Reynolds is surely using this attention to raise his profile, he’s also got genuine and transferable experience and skills.
 

coladin

Registered User
Sep 18, 2009
12,003
4,758
Really reaching when he had to pivot to RR selling immediately based on pure skepticism.
I didn't say that.

in a city that is growing at 1.07%. which is the 3rd year in a row of decline. It has sharply declined since 2018. With all evidence suggesting that it will remain stable at 1%. With an economy that is still civil servant dependent. And has a low corporate base (Lowest among all Canadian major cities (hockey cities)). The Land the CTS sits on, is probably not all that desirable.

The Kanata/Stitsville boom, once anticipated is not happening. The sprawling metropolis that Ottawa was once predicted to be, is not. Even the city's own projections are for a 1.1% increase in growth (population and jobs) in the next 28 years. If any massive effort goes into refurbing inner core real-estate, it will mean taking away from suburban expansion.

The long and short; the CTC land has value, but nothing earth shattering.
The land is extremely vaulable. But it will depend on zoning, or re-zoning depending on what the new owners would do with the land.
 

coladin

Registered User
Sep 18, 2009
12,003
4,758

JackieDaytona

regular human hockey fan.
Oct 21, 2007
1,634
1,531
Jeez, did Ryan Reynolds f*** some of your mums or girlfriends while he lived in Vanier or something? It’s a real reach to see anything but positive outcomes with his involvement, and yet here we are taking shots at his character and integrity. Have a look at the typical member of the billionaire set, such model f***ing humans for the most part. Why such a different standard for them vs charming movie star millionaire?
 

Emerica

Registered User
May 29, 2010
11,206
6,694
Jeez, did Ryan Reynolds f*** some of your mums or girlfriends while he lived in Vanier or something? It’s a real reach to see anything but positive outcomes with his involvement, and yet here we are taking shots at his character and integrity. Have a look at the typical member of the billionaire set, such model f***ing humans for the most part. Why such a different standard for them vs charming movie star millionaire?
Its only a few posters, who probably don't even believe in what they post. They just want to go against the grain at any opportunity that presents itself
 

BonHoonLayneCornell

Registered User
Oct 16, 2006
16,969
12,033
Yukon
Jeez, did Ryan Reynolds f*** some of your mums or girlfriends while he lived in Vanier or something? It’s a real reach to see anything but positive outcomes with his involvement, and yet here we are taking shots at his character and integrity. Have a look at the typical member of the billionaire set, such model f***ing humans for the most part. Why such a different standard for them vs charming movie star millionaire?
Anything is better than the last guy either way. Don't let this negative shit takeover after what we've had to endure.
 

coladin

Registered User
Sep 18, 2009
12,003
4,758
in a city that is growing at 1.07%. which is the 3rd year in a row of decline. It has sharply declined since 2018. With all evidence suggesting that it will remain stable at 1%. With an economy that is still civil servant dependent. And has a low corporate base (Lowest among all Canadian major cities (hockey cities)). The Land the CTS sits on, is probably not all that desirable.

The Kanata/Stitsville boom, once anticipated is not happening. The sprawling metropolis that Ottawa was once predicted to be, is not. Even the city's own projections are for a 1.1% increase in growth (population and jobs) in the next 28 years. If any massive effort goes into refurbing inner core real-estate, it will mean taking away from suburban expansion.

The long and short; the CTC land has value, but nothing earth shattering.
Today Ian Mendes posted an article answering what the value is of the land at CTC. Experts he spoke to said $100M. If they have zoning changes, or sever the 75 acres, it could be way, way more.
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,019
34,782
Today Ian Mendes posted an article answering what the value is of the land at CTC. Experts he spoke to said $100M. If they have zoning changes, or sever the 75 acres, it could be way, way more.
Yeah, that lines up to what was said in the past, with a bit of an increase due to inflation.

I recall something about a sale with the intent of retrofitting the arena to either be a mall or a distribution center potentially netting the team~80 mil. That was back when the first LeBreton bid fell through.
 

Tnuoc Alucard

🇨🇦🔑🧲✈️🎲🥅🎱🍟🥨🌗
Sep 23, 2015
8,313
1,981
To provide sufficient capital to the team to enable it to spend to the salary cap each year.

So do you think many current NHL franchise owners fund their teams, from their “Deep Pockets” rather than the revenues the franchise generates?

How long would an owner with “Deep Pockets” be able to fund his/her/their franchise with their own money, before they lost enough of their own money, and had to cut costs?

if a business is not successful enough to operate on it’s revenues…. Enough to pay its expenses, salaries, taxes and generate a profit for the owner(s)… then it will eventually fail…unless expenses are cut, and revenues rise.

Billionaires do not become billionaires by personally funding money losing businesses including sports franchises.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Samboni

Tnuoc Alucard

🇨🇦🔑🧲✈️🎲🥅🎱🍟🥨🌗
Sep 23, 2015
8,313
1,981
Anything is better than the last guy either way. Don't let this negative shit takeover after what we've had to endure.

Don’t fool yourself, just like any new GM or Coach, it’ll only be a matter of time before a segment of the fan base grab their torches and pitchforks and come after the new owner(s) no matter who they are…… I would say the honeymoon will last about two years.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BonHoonLayneCornell

Bevans

Registered User
Apr 15, 2016
2,648
2,330
So do you think many current NHL franchise owners fund their teams, from their “Deep Pockets” rather than the revenues the franchise generates?

How long would an owner with “Deep Pockets” be able to fund his/her/their franchise with their own money, before they lost enough of their own money, and had to cut costs?

if a business is not successful enough to operate on it’s revenues…. Enough to pay its expenses, salaries, taxes and generate a profit for the owner(s)… then it will eventually fail…unless expenses are cut, and revenues rise.

Billionaires do not become billionaires by personally funding money losing businesses including sports franchises.
What he's saying is not incorrect and you're mischaracterizing it.

Much like buying a rental property the potential owners would need to demonstrate to the banks that they can satisfy the necessary debt service ratio to keep the mortgage/loan in good standing.

So yes they do need capital. But, technically, not to spend on Giroux's salary; rather, they need sufficient capital (equity) in order to put down a down payment large enough to free up the revenue necessary to pay Giroux's salary.

As you can see it's semantics.
 

Tnuoc Alucard

🇨🇦🔑🧲✈️🎲🥅🎱🍟🥨🌗
Sep 23, 2015
8,313
1,981
What he's saying is not incorrect and you're mischaracterizing it.

Much like buying a rental property the potential owners would need to demonstrate to the banks that they can satisfy the necessary debt service ratio to keep the mortgage/loan in good standing.

So yes they do need capital. But, technically, not to spend on Giroux's salary; rather, they need sufficient capital (equity) in order to put down a down payment large enough to free up the revenue necessary to pay Giroux's salary.

As you can see it's semantics


that is your opinion….. and you’re entitled to it….. but I’ll let the poster I quoted speak for himself, that is why I asked for his feedback.
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
Jeez, did Ryan Reynolds f*** some of your mums or girlfriends while he lived in Vanier or something? It’s a real reach to see anything but positive outcomes with his involvement, and yet here we are taking shots at his character and integrity. Have a look at the typical member of the billionaire set, such model f***ing humans for the most part. Why such a different standard for them vs charming movie star millionaire?
It's easy behind a fake alias on the internet. The same people probably would take the shirt off their backs and lay it on the ground to keep his feet from getting wet given the opportunity in real life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bileur

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
Don’t fool yourself, just like any new GM or Coach, it’ll only be a matter of time before a segment of the fan base grab their torches and pitchforks and come after the new owner(s) no matter who they are…… I would say the honeymoon will last about two years.
That's not what happens unless the owner is an asshole. People just want a team to be run properly. What yours suggesting is pure fiction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bileur and Snowwy
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad