Burrow's pocket presence is great, and his ball placement is top notch. He reads defenses at a high level, too. But I honestly think his weapons elevate his play. An elite #1 in Chase, another #1 in Higgins, and a topnotch slot guy in Boyd. I think that's the best 3 weapons you can have on the field at once. Tua probably has the best 1-2 punch in Hill and Waddle, but I think I'd take Cincy's 3 weapons over Tua's 3 weapons.
I'm still waiting to see Burrow's 'X factor' come to light in the playoffs. It will happen, but he hasn't come close to the heights of Mahomes and Allen, which is a very, very tough height to reach.
Exactly this. Using the 'he is only good because he has good receiverzzz' arguement is pretty weak. Anyone doing that, simply comes across as a hater, to me.Let's not forget that Burrow was also unbeatable in High School, won a national championship in college, and continues to come up clutch in close games. He's a QB that doesn't feel pressure, very Montana-esque.
Also, not only would I take Miami's WRs over Cinci's, but McDaniel's offense is >>>>>> Zac Taylor's offense
Exactly this. Using the 'he is only good because he has good receiverzzz' arguement is pretty weak. Anyone doing that, simply comes across as a hater, to me.
From my observation - and it's been discussed here recently - most QBs really only truly rely on one elite receiving option & anything beyond that is a 'nice to have'. EG Allen/Diggs, Mahomes/Kelce, Burrow/Chase, Tua/Hill, so on. The one current exception to that i can think of would be Shanahan's scheme in SF.
Exactly this. Using the 'he is only good because he has good receiverzzz' arguement is pretty weak. Anyone doing that, simply comes across as a hater, to me.
From my observation - and it's been discussed here recently - most QBs really only truly rely on one elite receiving option & anything beyond that is a 'nice to have'. EG Allen/Diggs, Mahomes/Kelce, Burrow/Chase, Tua/Hill, so on. The one current exception to that i can think of would be Shanahan's scheme in SF.
I don’t think anyone is saying he isn’t good. People are questioning if he is elite. The difference is small, but very important. He has been average in the playoffs, but has been buoyed by tremendous defensive efforts for his success.Exactly this. Using the 'he is only good because he has good receiverzzz' arguement is pretty weak. Anyone doing that, simply comes across as a hater, to me.
From my observation - and it's been discussed here recently - most QBs really only truly rely on one elite receiving option & anything beyond that is a 'nice to have'. EG Allen/Diggs, Mahomes/Kelce, Burrow/Chase, Tua/Hill, so on. The one current exception to that i can think of would be Shanahan's scheme in SF.
Exactly this. Using the 'he is only good because he has good receiverzzz' arguement is pretty weak. Anyone doing that, simply comes across as a hater, to me.
From my observation - and it's been discussed here recently - most QBs really only truly rely on one elite receiving option & anything beyond that is a 'nice to have'. EG Allen/Diggs, Mahomes/Kelce, Burrow/Chase, Tua/Hill, so on. The one current exception to that i can think of would be Shanahan's scheme in SF.
Agreed. And I'll add that most great QBs need a solid foundation. Not necessarily elite weapons, but a mixture of solid coaching, weapons, O line, etc...I mean, I’d argue heavily that Tua has a scheme that is tailored to the one thing he does well and has two elite elite weapons.
Burrow I’d agree, dude has elite weapons but is still a franchise QB
Lewis Cine (S) was taken a few picks after Elam. He can't get on the field and when he has his play has generally been disappointing. Bills obviously have a long-term hole at S and will need depth when the senior duo inevitably gets banged up, but also wouldn't need him to play immediately. That's the best idea I've got.If Beane is looking to move Elam, it shouldn't be for a pick. Take a swing at another underperforming player. Kelvin Sheppard for Jerry Hughes type trade. I didn't like the Basham trade for that reason.
I'd move Elam but not for a pick.
I agree with much of what you say. But I didn't say that his WR core doesn't help him - rather it isn't the reason why he's considered as being elite / in the same tier as an Allen or a Mahomes or not - which is what i think is being suggested by some.I completely disagree. A top tier slot receiver makes life easier for a QB. They come up big on those third downs. Beasley has been sorely missed in this offense. Also, Higgins isn't just a good #2. He'd be a #1 on a lot of teams. That's a luxury most QBs don't have, and I find it hard to believe that having perhaps the best #2 WR in the league doesn't help a QB when he's going through his progressions.
One of the reasons the Browns have had so much success against that offense is because they have corners that can actually matchup against the Cincy's WRs. I've read it countless times from Bengals and Browns fans. Most teams are going to struggle slowing down that WR core.
It's nothing against Burrow. He'd still be a damn good QB regardless of his weapons. As I said, his pocket presence, ball placement, and ability to read defense range from good-to-great traits of his. He'd succeed regardless. But to say having the best WR core in the NFL doesn't help him is strange to me.
I will say, his coaching leaves a lot to be desired, and I also agree with Fezzy that McDaniel is a far better game planner. He's a lot like Shannahan in his ability to get the ball into his playmakers hands. I read a comment on here that Tua is the perfect point guard for that squad, and I think that's a great analogy, though I do think Tua is quite a bit better than he gets credit for on this forum.
Burrow is very different to Cousins IMO.I don’t think anyone is saying he isn’t good. People are questioning if he is elite. The difference is small, but very important. He has been average in the playoffs, but has been buoyed by tremendous defensive efforts for his success.
Vikings win a lot of games with Cousins and he passes for a lot of yards/TDs. Does that make him elite?
I wouldn't call Waddle elite. He's just fast more than anything - and as others have mentioned - players in that scheme are used very effectively (including the QB).I mean, I’d argue heavily that Tua has a scheme that is tailored to the one thing he does well and has two elite elite weapons.
Burrow I’d agree, dude has elite weapons but is still a franchise QB
I'd make that trade. I'd also see what NO thinks about Penning. He struggled in week 1.Lewis Cine (S) was taken a few picks after Elam. He can't get on the field and when he has his play has generally been disappointing. Bills obviously have a long-term hole at S and will need depth when the senior duo inevitably gets banged up, but also wouldn't need him to play immediately. That's the best idea I've got.
I am very high on the Giants....in that they will be better than their first 3 weeks.
Better than first three weeks is far from being goodI am not. I feel like they caught lightning in a bottle last year, and are regressing.
don't worry Hodgins will save themBetter than first three weeks is far from being good
Not with Danny Dimes throwing Pennie’s like he was last night.don't worry Hodgins will save them
Can we just forget about Danny Nickels for a minute? I'm still trying to recover by saying he could be a top-10 QB during the offseason. My pride is in shambles!Not with Danny Dimes throwing Pennie’s like he was last night.
They're the Bills in 2018 if they'd signed Tyrod to be the guy instead of recognizing they'd maxed out where they were with him.I am not. I feel like they caught lightning in a bottle last year, and are regressing.
I have your walk-it-back speech ready. Tell everyone you meant it literally. He's a top-10 QB in the offseason. Golfing, etc. When the football season resumes, his ranking drops.Can we just forget about Danny Nickels for a minute? I'm still trying to recover by saying he could be a top-10 QB during the offseason. My pride is in shambles!