Confirmed Signing with Link: [SEA] F Matty Beniers re-signs with the Kraken (7 years, $7.14M AAV)

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Theodore450

Registered User
Sep 10, 2013
4,580
2,337
I see him Topping out as krechi level player. So this should be a good contract that he’ll age into
 

seafoam

Soft Shock
Sponsor
May 17, 2011
60,815
10,288
I like these deals, but (and I have no concrete examples at the moment) the team's that sign them tend to not make any noise until the back half of them, sometimes when there is a year or two left on these deals.

If I am a GM signing this contract, I am looking to compete for a conference championship for like legitimately 6/7 years of this deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Interior Cascadian

Gregor Samsa

Registered User
Sep 5, 2020
3,728
4,376
Impossible contact to have any feeling about right now as it’s totally betting on the future. Time will tell; could be great, good be alright, could be bad
 

Malkinstheman

Registered User
Aug 12, 2012
9,742
8,940
This contract makes Bernier around the #100th highest paid player in the league. Feels like peoples salary ranges are still based on 10 years ago. Salaries are only going to keep going up as the cap goes up.
 

BKarchitect

Registered User
Oct 12, 2017
7,888
14,004
Kansas City, MO
Sophomore jinx got him, but his work rate is so f***ing high, and he has pretty good tools to go with that, he'll be worth his contract, and perhaps more.
Agreed. Disappointing sophomore year (like lots of the Kraken TBF) but he's too good not to be at least a high-end #2 with an all-weather game.

This will age well...I think he'll be a much better all-around player than more than a few of the guys who have gotten similar or even more on their max 7-8 year, post-ELC extensions.

This is a bet I'm making knowing what we've already seen from him on the ice as a rookie and what kind of character he has.
 

Interior Cascadian

Registered User
Apr 2, 2007
1,112
206
Olympia, WA
I like these deals, but (and I have no concrete examples at the moment) the team's that sign them tend to not make any noise until the back half of them, sometimes when there is a year or two left on these deals.

If I am a GM signing this contract, I am looking to compete for a conference championship for like legitimately 6/7 years of this deal.
Nailed it. Combined with many of their wave of top draft prospects playing out the last year or two of their ELCs, Grubi’s contract off the books, etc, they could have some serious cap space to load up and go for a deep run.
 

seafoam

Soft Shock
Sponsor
May 17, 2011
60,815
10,288
Nailed it. Combined with many of their wave of top draft prospects playing out the last year or two of their ELCs, Grubi’s contract off the books, etc, they could have some serious cap space to load up and go for a deep run.
I think it's just a waste if you are not trying to compete immediately. You've clearly identified a core player that you think you can win with. Why waste time? Go for it...otherwise why sign the deal? For ownership?
 

State of Hockey

Registered User
Oct 9, 2006
13,350
774
Once again the majority are proclaiming it's a great deal for the team, so if these long-term deals based on promise are always great deals for the team, why does the player agree to them?

This should be looked at as a great deal for Beniers. He's proven nothing to earn $50m. What happened last year erases his early success and puts him back into needing to prove himself to earn this much money. I think the broader question is whether or not Beniers is even that good in the first place. That Michigan team was so deep that the danger is automatically believing that all of them are good independently of each other. And it's been a similar story in Seattle. Their high tide lifted all boats in his rookie year. His boat sank the hardest when the tide rolled out last season.
 

Breakers

Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Aug 5, 2014
22,124
20,754
Denver Colorado
Once again the majority are proclaiming it's a great deal for the team, so if these long-term deals based on promise are always great deals for the team, why does the player agree to them?

This should be looked at as a great deal for Beniers. He's proven nothing to earn $50m. What happened last year erases his early success and puts him back into needing to prove himself to earn this much money. I think the broader question is whether or not Beniers is even that good in the first place. That Michigan team was so deep that the danger is automatically believing that all of them are good independently of each other. And it's been a similar story in Seattle. Their high tide lifted all boats in his rookie year. His boat sank the hardest when the tide rolled out last season.

I agree
It seems like every long term deal on Hfboards is team friendly, and like it isnt the player seeking long term security amidst uncertainty
 

PizzaAndPucks

New Jersey Angels diehard
Nov 29, 2018
2,906
4,562
Good deal. I was hoping Catton would be available for the Devils this past Draft but Seattle got him. That 1/2 punch longterm down the middle of Beniers/Catton looks good if Catton is a center at the NHL level. If not he should be a high end winger for Beniers. Could be a Nico/Hughes like combo.
 

Interior Cascadian

Registered User
Apr 2, 2007
1,112
206
Olympia, WA
I think it's just a waste if you are not trying to compete immediately. You've clearly identified a core player that you think you can win with. Why waste time? Go for it...otherwise why sign the deal? For ownership?
Definitely go for it. Anything can happen in the playoffs. I’m just saying the financial and developmental stars appear set to align through the back half of Beniers’ new contract, and you have to think there’s some legitimate groundwork now in place to say they could be cup contenders. The roster will have young blue chip talent having accrued some meaningful NHL experience while their ELCs provide cap space for veterans to balance out the roster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seafoam

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,423
25,977
Medfield, MA
I don't like this deal. I don't understand why teams don't take advantage of bridge deals.

Sign the player for 2-3 years at a lower cap hit, make sure he's the real deal and then sign him to the 7 year deal when he's closer to free agency. You get some cap savings and control the player longer.

This deal pays him big money before producing big numbers and he's a UFA in 7 years.
 

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
5,065
2,521
I don't like this deal. I don't understand why teams don't take advantage of bridge deals.

Sign the player for 2-3 years at a lower cap hit, make sure he's the real deal and then sign him to the 7 year deal when he's closer to free agency. You get some cap savings and control the player longer.

This deal pays him big money before producing big numbers and he's a UFA in 7 years.
With the cap going up in the next few years, that deal is almost a guaranteed bargain. In 2-3 years, he ends up signing for 9-10M because the cap has gone up, he has nothing to prove and your buying off more UFA years.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad