DangleBojangle
Registered User
- Feb 1, 2020
- 64
- 26
Proposal: Schenn to TOR
- Thread starter DangleBojangle
- Start date
SmoggyTwinkles
Go Leafs Go
Hell no.
Hard pass.
Dermott AND 3rd? Wouldn't do either!
Hard pass.
Dermott AND 3rd? Wouldn't do either!
DangleBojangle
Registered User
- Feb 1, 2020
- 64
- 26
Why? It's not like the Leafs are using Dermott and a 3rd round pick isn't much
Schenn is what the leafs need.
I dont think Vancouver says yes either.
SmoggyTwinkles
Go Leafs Go
DangleBojangle
Registered User
- Feb 1, 2020
- 64
- 26
Schenn is 4th in hits among Defenceman, you need grit in the playoffs. Leafs don't have any heavy hitting Defenceman.
Arthur Morgan
Registered User
already been over this in a previous thread they think or some think we should add a 2nd on top of Dermott because Schenn is playing well with Hughes
seems like VAN wants alot more than than Schenn's true value prob best to just look else where
seems like VAN wants alot more than than Schenn's true value prob best to just look else where
SmoggyTwinkles
Go Leafs Go
DangleBojangle
Registered User
- Feb 1, 2020
- 64
- 26
A 3rd is the most I would offer Schenn. No reason to add a 2nd, better off going after a better defenceman in that case.
Arthur Morgan
Registered User
yeah I agree I find this offer is pretty fair and the MOST I would ever consider adding on top would be a late pick next year as a kicker
This was tried already.
We don’t want Dermott.
We have also established that Leafs fans are babies and we need to let you know that Dermott is a good player and all the tears aren’t necessary.
The nucks just don’t want him and that’s ok.
Schenn has been hitting and smashing his way into Canucks fans hearts and you can’t have him
DangleBojangle
Registered User
- Feb 1, 2020
- 64
- 26
You wanted Leivo and and now you want Dermott ok?
Hahah.
I would have been jazzed to not waste time on Leivo, and I’ll be even happier to not get Dermott.
How does it work with Van?
Th pick is almost as underwhelming as Dermott is as a player.
Schenn is top 5 in hitting and is great with Hughes.
Dermott is neither of those things, and costs more.
Big old pass
Fatass
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2017
- 23,884
- 15,556
Would need to be a serious overpay for the Canucks to Move
Schenn. He’s a good partner for Hughes.
Schenn. He’s a good partner for Hughes.
Hoglander
I'm Höglander. I can do whatever I want.
Schenn has another year at near league minimum. I think we keep the better player for now, and trade him next deadline for a 3rd, without taking an unwanted contract back. Add a B prospect or change it to a 2nd, and I'd do it, but not for a late 3rd.
- Jul 28, 2011
- 16,101
- 10,810
I meant to say doesn't work with Vancouver. I'll edit it. Thanks for letting me know i screwed up the post lol.
Last edited:
There's been a lot of interest in Schenn due to his upswing in play, but you have to consider how much of that is a direct result of playing with Hughes. Hughes is absolutely elite at zone exits, covering for one of Schenn's major weaknesses. He doesn't have to worry about getting the puck out of danger, just has to be a big, physical body and make it difficult for players to get to the front of the net. In return Schenn covers for Hughes' lack of size.
Any team looking to trade for Schenn isn't likely to get the value out of him that Vancouver is right now.
Any team looking to trade for Schenn isn't likely to get the value out of him that Vancouver is right now.
Buresflyingelbow
VanCity
- Feb 19, 2018
- 2,686
- 1,873
Keep Dermott. Just turn it to a 2nd instead of a third. With $800,000 near league minimum next year you’re getting great value for next year as well and two playoff runs.
Martin Skoula
Registered User
- Oct 18, 2017
- 12,205
- 17,168
Would venture that has something to do with his team never having the puck when he's on the ice.
His line mate is Quinn Hughes, so you would be wrong. He makes the most out of his time and opportunities
