SCF Game #1, KINGS(3 vs. RANGERS(2 - 6/4/14, OT 3-2 Victory !!!!

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
tumblr_n6oegdISaa1retk6lo1_500.gif

:laugh::laugh:
 
Penner giving the Kings a lot of love on twitter. I bet he would die for DL to offer him a contract in the offseason. I think he could definitely have a good TV career when he retires.
 
Doughty with 2 career Stanley Cup highlight reel plays in his young career. He did have that lowlight tonight, but he came up big after.

Besides the goal he gave up and the goal he scored, he was decent tonight.
 
Richards had a good game.

The narrative after this game appears to be that the Rangers lost this game by themselves.

That will be the narrative some people want to run with after the series is over.

**** the narrative. If the Kings walk away with the Cup, they can say whatever they'd like

Agree on Richards, he's doing a good job of being where we need him and controlling the puck.

What's the over/under on how many cocky Rangers fans make an appearance on our boards tonight? ;)
 
So crazy to believe we are even playing...can you remember back to APRIL 22. Down, 3 games to 0, versus the Sharks. It has been a most unbelievable run.
 
As Pulp Fiction put it... let's not all start sucking each other off just yet.

Got 3 more wins before a cup can be given to the Kings. They worked for the win. They gotta keep doing it.
 
So, after the first we looked good.

Expect the first game to be open against a fast team. You adjust to it. The Kings will be much better next game.

This.

I thought the first 15 minutes were pretty bad, but even after that they seemed to adjust a bit. Hopefully, a day of practice and some rest will only help.
 
If the narrative is that the Rangers "lost this game themselves", then those who wrote the narrative need to put down the crackpipe.


Shots were 43-27 Kings, and outside of two breakaways, New York struggled quite a bit to generate offense. Might want to rethink that narrative.
 
GAME 1: 2012
--COLIN FRASER scores the first goal for the kings in the final
--OT winner

GAME 1: 2014
--KYLE CLIFFORD scores the first goal for the kings in the final
--OT winner
 
The Rangers fans tears of unfathomable sadness are absolutely delicious.
 
That might have been Mitchell's best game of the playoffs. Pretty solid and good positionally and wasn't gettng beat. Even had a few wicked shots that gave Henrik
a bit of trouble.

The Kings out-shot the Rangers 23-5 with Willie Mitchell on the ice at evens.

I'll take Mitchell in the playoffs any day. 2014 Norstrom AFAIC.
 
First of all, it was nice to finally see Quick have a great game. He made some brilliant saves, which is why we won game 1. If he is solid like this the rest of the way, I really like our chances. The Rangers play a pretty solid team defense, keeping us on the perimeter. We may have worn them down come the third period, but most of the shots were putty in Hank's hands. We need to take the puck to the middle (see Doughty goal) and the Toffoli/Kopitar chances and get more traffic in front of their net. We played most of the game outside the dots. Quite frankly Muzzin, Doughty and Voynov all had some pretty bad blunders this game. The D needs to be better. Mitchell, Greene and Martinez were pretty solid. A last but not least, glad we won the game, but our PP totally sucked. I mean just terrible. On to game two. Need to hold home serve.
 
put the glasses on that one.


Rangers did not get a shot on goal with Kopitar on the ice. It's been a struggle offensively, but he's still getting it done where he can
 
i don't give a ffff, i'm keeping Kyle Clifford

no more Clifford dissing, this kid will only get better

love this ffff !
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad