Larry Brooks: Sather reached out to UFA Vinny Prospal

  • Thread starter Thread starter Punxrocknyc19*
  • Start date Start date
  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
this ship has sailed. if this is the type of players that we're interested in still this org is even more delusional that i suspected...
 
this ship has sailed. if this is the type of players that we're interested in still this org is even more delusional that i suspected...

Being interested in someone who actually played well here to fill in the roster while half the team is injured is a delusion?
Well then...
 
Wouldn't mind him here. He can't be worse than what we have. Although, I'm not sure how much better he makes this team, if at all.
 
This indicates Zuccarello is not cutting it as we could really only afford to have one of those two players on this roster full time.

A guy for the PP who can't do much else is a one per team liability, as we saw with Shanahan near the end of his career.
 
This indicates Zuccarello is not cutting it as we could really only afford to have one of those two players on this roster full time.

A guy for the PP who can't do much else is a one per team liability, as we saw with Shanahan near the end of his career.

Why Zuccarello? I'd sit Pouliot over him, they're pretty much the same, except Pouliot's brain is microscopic.
 
The Sather special.

band-aid.jpg
 
exactly. make a real trade. none of this retread reclamation bs
 
exactly. make a real trade. none of this retread reclamation bs

Why? I don't want to risk losing an asset for a might-be lost season. I'd rather sign a guy who might or might not suck than a guy we gotta give up for.
 
How is it a reclamation project? He had 30 points in 48 games last year.

Can we get Martin Rucinski for a fourth time?
 
Why? I don't want to risk losing an asset for a might-be lost season. I'd rather sign a guy who might or might not suck than a guy we gotta give up for.

i'm not looking at trying to salvage this season, but trading players that don't fit into AV's system. If this is a lost season, fine, and least develop youth and bring in players that fit.

I don't want to see Pyatt, Pouliout, and others in the lineup that doesn't belong here...
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad