Give each 82 games, Archy would outscore him and so would Kuhn and Sprong. Which is why i don't get this trade.
Maybe because we do not have an issue scoring goals? We were the highest scoring team in the league last year - with our #1D missing half the season, without Guentzel playing a full season and with Sheary and Malking missing 20+ games each. Oh and that includes Hagelin and Hornqvist both having down seasons and missing games.
There is zero reason why we need "more scoring" on the 4th line with the talent we will be able to ice on a regular basis in the top 9.
People do not like or understand the Reaves trade - I get it. But this idea that we could get 5 more goals out of Archie or whomever over Reaves and that therefore they're a better choice is asinine.