GDT: Sabres vs Islanders 7 PM ET TV:MSG Radio:WGR550 - Hockey Fights Cancer

slip

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 19, 2005
16,276
4,924
We need a strong vet partner for Power.

Kevyn: Best I can do is a failing bust kid struggling for playing time on a good team because he sucks.
Also Kevyn: And let me give up one of our best overall forwards whom we spent years developing for said player because we can't afford to pay him slightly better than Olofsson money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sabremike

sabremike

#1 Tageaholic
Aug 30, 2010
24,115
37,071
Brewster, NY
Three full days rest, home game, opponent can't score and isn't good and sent their best player back home before the game, and had to play the second half of the game with 4 defensemen, and the Sabres couldn't handle them and didn't look very competitive for the vast majority of the game.
Did you happen to see the Isles bottom 6 for this game? It was reminiscent of those you would see on pre Vegas expansion teams. I'm only half joking when I say I think if Rochester had shown up and thrown on Sabres uniforms tonight they probably win unless their sieve of a goalie stunk the joint out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GellMann

JLewyB

Registered User
May 6, 2013
4,020
1,735
Pegulaville
No...

I missed the first but saw we had a 76% deserve to win on Moneypuck. Were we flat in the first??
Yes. The d-men were extra bad. At least 3-4 times horvat and others got behind the D including the goal.

I suppose the cycle was working better in the first and we had PP advantage but for the most part they were sloppy and disengaged as a team
 
  • Like
Reactions: HOOats

joshjull

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
79,550
42,321
Hamburg,NY
My first order of business would be to flip Joker and Samuelson and go from there. These parings have been wildly inconsistent all season, but Ruff seem dead set on sticking with this configuration. Maybe start working in Gilbert here and there for some accountability.
The bigger problem among the d-pairs is the worst one, Power/Byram

Worst of the 3 pairs at generating offensive chances for, by a wide margin.
Worst of the 3 pairs at preventing offensive chances against.

I wish I had a clever solution for this with the existing roster but I don’t.
 
Last edited:

sabremike

#1 Tageaholic
Aug 30, 2010
24,115
37,071
Brewster, NY
Yes. The d-men were extra bad. At least 3-4 times horvat and others got behind the D including the goal.

I suppose the cycle was working better in the first and we had PP advantage but for the most part they were sloppy and disengaged as a team
They literally brought back the entire staff save for replacing Ellis with Appert. Somehow I don't think the Chicago White Sox are going to keep virtually their entire coaching staff for next season.
 

Dubi Doo

Registered User
Aug 27, 2008
20,160
14,021
What an ass performance. Taking a break again. So many careless turnovers. Too many dangles. They're still not committed to winning against teams that make them work for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NotABadPeriod

Tatanka

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2016
4,707
3,183
They literally brought back the entire staff save for replacing Ellis with Appert. Somehow I don't think the Chicago White Sox are going to keep virtually their entire coaching staff for next season.
Uhm…you may need a different analogy. Just sayin
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad