Irie
Registered User
The retaliation bit did cross my mind with Quinn, JJ, etc coming up. I do think there is a bit of pressure point in Seattle as you laid out - they have $20m cap but a bunch of spots to fill. They'd likely prefer not paying the max of Borgen's market - not sure how arb treats defensive D these days (tbh Samuelsson might be a comp), but $4.3m feels near the top for him.
Francis was just extended, so he will be there a while, and the Kraken will have a lot of forward money coming off the books in the next three years (10M, 9M, and 11M) and will likely be looking for top nine talent to step right in - in essence, they will be in a pretty ideal place to extend vengence for an offersheet. I would not risk it.
Given Adams and Francis' relationship, I wonder if they could work out something less hostile with the implied leverage of his RFA status still in play. What's the add for Joki + for Borgen?
It would have been less last offseason, but this year, Oleksiak has fallen off as a defensive D, Soucy is likely leaving via free agency, and Larsson is turning 31 with only 2 seasons left on his contract, so their need for Borgen has increased ten-fold in 12 months.
Honestly though, it is pretty hard to read, as it seemed like they had a solid Borgen-lite player in Fleury ready for 3rd line duty, but Hakstol doesn't seem to like him (although the same thing was said of Borgen last year, so who knows). They also added Megna, but he was not very impressive in limited games.
I think it would take more than a late 2nd to start a conversation. But if the offer was good enough, Francis could possibly look to resign Soucy and take the deal for Borgen (Soucy has been very good playing RHD for the Kraken in the past).
EDIT: Browsing the Seattle board, I see posters estimating $1.2, "3rd pairing money," $2.0, and $2.5-3.0. Might be something there.
Yeah, they tend to grossly undervalue contract estimations there, but Francis has been a magician since his time with the Canes in getting players to sign for bargains, and there is no state income tax in Washington, so their estimates may be closer than an educated guess would suggest.