RE: Bolded
Best case scenario, EJ and Clifton are equal to where Joki was at the beginning of camp last offseason. In reality, I see them where Joki and Bryson were at the end of the year.
Johnson has very much looked like the wrong side of 30 player he is. He's lost quite a few steps in recent years. He's cashed in playing on an offensive force. He's a decent vet for a role, and he might be able to give you a good game 1 in 8 games, which may give Granato some flexibility to keep guys fresh, gameplan his roster to the opponent.
Clifton is the big one I'm worried about. I like his attitude towards games, and of course I like seeing him use his checking to take guys out of plays. But he had the safety net of a great structure of a team defense to help cover up some holes he left behind when he went to battle someone out of position. Unless the team defense does a 180 immediately to how they play in their own zone, I fear what will follow with how he plays the game. His decision making is pretty bad. I do like his transition game, so that should help out of he's able to keep his errors to a minimum.
I wouldn't say they are unquestionably better than what we had recently outside Power, Dahlin, and Samuelsson, but they do have a chance to be better. It's a slightly improvement than the Middle Pair AHL defenseman we had on the roster last year, I still think you're looking at a NHL 6-8th defenseman in both Clifton and EJ.
You may be more right than wrong on Eric Johnson's 2023-24 performance / consistency. However, if Eric Johnson, regardless of whether he is paired with Owen Power none, some, or all of the time, can serve as an in-game, on-ice, and off-ice coach for Owen Power and elevate Power's performance and consistency by 10-15%, it will likely, IMO, more than make up for any continued degradation in Eric Johnson's play.
Not arguing, but whether Clifton and E. Johnson are NHL #6-#8 defensemen is immaterial to how they slot in BUF.
Before this offseason (in rough order):
Dahlin
Samuelsson
Power
Lyubushkin
Joker
Stillman
(Clague)
Bryson
Add in E. Johnson and Clifton.
Assuming Clague is in Rochester, that's 9 d-men and I think Bryson is clearly lowest on that list of potential NHL'ers
Do I think BUF is better in '23-24 with less than 59 games of Bryson and 33 games of Kale Clague (which they indeed played in '22-23)?
Yes, I do.
Even if it's half as many games they play in Buffalo vs. '22-23, that's a benefit to the Sabres, and that's not a knock on Bryson (who has clear limitations) nor Clague (whom I grew to like more as the season progressed).
We'll have to wait to see whether "more" E. Johnson and Clifton is better in '23-24 than "less" Bryson and Clague (or whomever you wish to insert as the displaced d-men - I admit someone may be still be traded), but for now, the logic behind the plan makes sense to me, and it doesn't depend on where the Sabres newbies would slot on other NHL team's blueliner depth.
You're splitting hairs over who plays where, instead of the bigger issue that KA will only go with 13 FWs.
I have no issue with that, given both the number of ROC forwards and the proximity of BUF to ROC for a substantial fraction of the AHL/NHL regular season home overlap (haven't looked at the schedules, but probably 20-25 games). I'd rather carry 3 goalies to avoid a waiver pluck by another team when there are so many waiver-exempt ROC forwards who have a legit chance at a future in BUF.
<snipped logical post about potential homer bias defending Buffalo/WNY>
I know posting this on this board will go over like a fart in church, but...I can take it.
Done that often enough to know how to disguise it. (And therefore I can also take it.)
I was once more offended seeing a full two hands worth of fingernail clippings left in a pew.