SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
Depends on whether or not a poster likes or dislikes the player in question.
I don't even think it's that necessarily. If I say he went pointless in 7 of 12 games that doesn't tell the full story either.
Depends on whether or not a poster likes or dislikes the player in question.
Still don't see the sense in re-signing a guy just so we can spend the next 3+ years wondering if he can play out the remainder of his deal. The guy is falling apart.
I don't see the "falling apart". He has been good for the Rangers. He has never been a speedster. Shanahan was not either when he came over.
Interesting how all the sudden draft picks have value around here.
The funny part about it is that if it is a concussion, its not even the type of injury that would lend credence to the argument that his body is falling apart. Concussions happen to players at every level of play. It is pretty much the one injury that he could have gotten that does not support that point of view. Yet people still come here to say "SEE, TOLD YA, HIS BODY IS FALLING APART," or jump on the dump-him bandwagon at the first bump in the road.
Would you consider Clowe's concussion to come on a major collision? Like Sauer's?
No, me neither. The cumulative effects of concussions make it easier and easier to get additional ones. Even without the head injury, the guy is a beat up hockey player.
I think its absurd people are willing to hand him a 3 or 4 year deal. Absolutely absurd. You can see it as an issue from 100 miles away, but some fans STILL cant help themselves
Would you consider Clowe's concussion to come on a major collision? Like Sauer's?
No, me neither.
The cumulative effects of concussions make it easier and easier to get additional ones.
Then you're a fool. The type of collision really doesn't matter for concussions. If you're really going to blame a concussion on the fact that he's "old" (30 y/o...) and his body is falling apart, then I just don't know what to say. Go run into someone's elbow-pad protected elbow with your face. Tell me how you feel.
I personally don't think Clowe's (relatively minor) injury history is a reason to turn up our noses at the guy. He's not like a Gaborik who has been chronically injured his entire career (though even in Gabby's case, that isn't why I personally wanted him gone). Staal has had a concussion. Nash may have too. Hey - Nash also had groin problems. Boyle has now potentially had multiple concussions. Callahan has had more injuries than I can count over his career. Are all of these players on the verge of falling apart too? Are their careers over? It is a physical sport. Injuries happen.
Now I'm not saying the concern for him playing the type of game that lends itself to deterioration as he ages isn't a valid concern. Just saying that this particular example being used to try to prove that point is about as much bs as you can get.
Hes out with a concussion on a collision that was anything but major. His statistically poor season is excused because of a shoulder injury.
If you dont see that the guy is falling apart, you should open your eyes.
Youve tried to lecture about concussions, but its quite clear you just dont understand.
The day you get your first concussion, you are more susceptible to get another one. And so it goes.
The season that Callahan or Nash or whoever's production falls of a damn cliff, then yes, Ill raise concerns about them declining.
Clowe is there now, so thats why we're having the discussion about him. Get it?
EDIT: And apologies for the you're a fool comment. It was unnecessary - and I was hoping to edit it out before anyone saw it.
You don't know much about concussions
Anyway, he suffered a concussion in early 2012 and tried to play trough it.
Didn't know that. Knew about his knee problems a few years back and his shoulder issues this year. If what you say is true (source?), then the proximity of the two concussions would give me some concern. That said, I'd hope the Rangers organization would consider that in what they do with him. If they decide they think it isn't going to be a persistent problem, then I'm willing to trust them and am still not outright opposed to re-signing him, as I think he brings some valuable things to the table.
What's disturbing is that Clowe apparently suffered a concussion at some point during the second half of the season. It's not clear if his concussion corresponded with the time he missed in January due to a facial injury. "He'll tell you he didn't have the greatest year," Sharks GM Doug Wilson said. "There are excuses and there are reasons; I think with Clowie there were some reasons."
Seriously? Are you denying that a history of concussions makes you more susceptible to them going forward?
This is absolutely true. Agreed. Does he have a history of concussions though? As far as I'm aware, he does not.
I don't see the "falling apart". He has been good for the Rangers. He has never been a speedster. Shanahan was not either when he came over.
His shoulder has been shot for most of the year. He's getting progressively slower with each season when he was already painfully slow to begin with. Now he has a concussion which is very tough injury for a guy who makes a lot of noise with his fists. The science around concussions is sketchy at best, but many people believe it makes him more susceptible to additional concussions.
I think he's been pretty mediocre since he arrived. Shanahan was much different. He was several years older and yet still put up a PPG season in Detroit. However, you saw how quickly his body broke down. It's what happens to guys who play a hard-nosed game like this. Eventually the body just says "enough" and their game falls off a cliff.
I just see people writing off a unique player who knows how to play his style of game. I am not saying he will be a HUGE producer, but if you can sign him for anything near 3-3.5 million I take that and run. At that salary, for what he provides in terms of production (35-45 points), toughness and leadership he is worth it. He is the exact type of player you love to have on a line with young players.
Prust got 2.5. Clowe @ 3.5 is the better investment.
I am not saying just give him whatever. What I am saying is that for how unique of a player he is, these injuries do not concern me. He is not 35.
Clowe's a smarter player and a much better locker room presence. You can't measure locker room presence? Look at the night and day change in the demeanor and play of the Rangers after they lost Prust, Dubinsky, and Rupp... Those were GOOD locker room guys. Torres is not. Clowe is.
People are writing him off because we can't afford to invest money in players who look like they're breaking down. Point production is the kind of thing that separates Clowe from the Prusts of the world. If he's not scoring 50 points a year, why not target a guy who will give you 30 points but is younger, cheaper, and has the speed to keep up with the game?
If he wants a one or two year deal to prove he's healthy, fine, but I'm not comfortable with 3+ years.