JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK
Twenty f*ckin years
- Oct 8, 2010
- 80,014
- 17,626
It's actually not.
It actually is, because it's a very, very small sample size compared to a very, very large one.
It's actually not.
If Clowe can garner 2-3 2nd round picks, and 41 year old Jagr can garner a 2nd round pick + prospects, and Roy can garner a 1st round pick, then you better believe a 40 goal scorer will pull in a 1st round pick +.
His past performance is indicative of his future potential performance. Just because he isn't playing great right now doesn't mean he can't turn it around: his past stats show evidence that he can be a productive offensive player.
Has there been any reports on what Clowe is looking for in his next contract? Years/Money?
I don't think we should play Clowe with Boyle. Unless our intention is for him to finish the season with zero goals.
Thanks a lot, man. If he can provide a mix of what Prust and Dubi brought, I'd be pretty happy. I contend that we miss those guys the most, and one player doing both (Prust's toughness with Dubi's 40+ points)? I'm cool with that.
In 28 games, in a shortened season where he had a shoulder injury. Small sample size. I'm more keen on using the 4 season sample size over the 2 month one.
imo, this is alot to pay for
a guy having a down year
on his way to 31
and who may bolt for vancouver in the summer....
i mean does this guy help us down the road even a little bit and thats assuming he even resigns?
![]()
6 mil, 7-8 years
The funniest thing about that... I'm not joking.
That's the rumor anyway.
8 years, 48 mil. Seriously.
A simple HockeyDB search would have saved you this question.So Clowe is basically a Pyatt who has a mean streak?
I don't even care about the goals, he adds much needed grit. We have guys that can score they're just not doing it. We don't have many guys who play physical and stand up for teammates. I like it.
So Clowe is basically a Pyatt who has a mean streak? Not faster, just grittier and more leadership? Not happy with the picks we gave up, we didn't have a first, now we lose a second and third.