Are you insinuating that Yakupov being a former 1st overall pick is lowering his value due to the height of disappointment? If so, that is a very poor way to evaluate ability and potential impact of a Yakupov acquisition.
Yakupov would thrive with a veteran centre. He did with Roy and Roy was on waivers that season.
Anaheim is weak in the winger department. Buying low on Yakupov would be a shrewd move for a team like Anaheim who is in "win now" mode. Yakupov is an NHL player who would benefit from a change of scenery and especially to a veteran team.
Buying low on Yak ? Montour is not buying low on Yak . It is overpayment . Stating Montour is an AHL D doesn't help the argument . Does Puljujarvi have lower value then Yak because you are using the NHL vs AHL argument therefore AHL must have more value then JR player .
I guess Puljujarvi ++ for Montour as the player in the highly league has more value . We both know as well as everyone else in this thread that the value of a player isn't base on the league they play in useless there are other factor .
The Ducks are deep at D if we had Montour I bet he would have been our best RHD last year in the NHL .
The Ducks >>>> Then the Oilers when it comes to developing prospects . To me this statement makes the Ducks players /prospects worth more