leafsfan5
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2014
- 14,842
- 25,845
It was a shitty hit no doubt, it was as reckless on Reavos part as it was on Nurse'.What kind of response is this? Terrible take. It was a hit to the head. End of sentence. Makes no difference if it was Nurse or Ceci. Reaves intention means nothing. What Nurse may have done is baseless. If you think it was a legal hit, take off the blue tinted glasses.
LOL, Ryan Reaves you are hereby mandated to play 1st line minutes, point on PP 1 and PK for all 2 minutes, for the duration of your contractAn actual punishment would be forcing his to PLAY every game. No health scratches allowed
Yeah, this one is ok, and I don't think it is at all too steep.Not trying to defend Parros, but no matter what verdict he handed down, there would be large swaths of people calling him an incompetent idiot for his decision. Personally, I thought it was about right; perhaps a tad on the side of steep. Then again, I don’t believe that Reevo targeted his head with intent.
No. That’s why they gave him 5 games.Do we get cap relief as though he is injured?
He should have known, but I bet Nurse keeps his head up from now on.My question.....is this a penalty in the playoffs?
It seems reasonable that Reaves would be suspended for the that play, but the combination of the broadcast crew calling for an execution and general Parros bias towards Toronto seems to have made it a little longer than it should have been.how was this hit worse then the jeannot one?
I guess the jersey added a couple for good measure
It seems reasonable that Reaves would be suspended for the that play, but the combination of the broadcast crew calling for an execution and general Parros bias towards Toronto seems to have made it a little longer than it should have been.
I'm ok with the suspension, but it being longer than what Jeannot got just shows that league remains bush.