shaner8989
Registered User
- Aug 6, 2005
- 23,445
- 5,581
Cut the dead weight. Jarnkrok is absolutely garbage in the playoffs and Reaves doesn’t play.
Why they are even on the team is beyond me
Why they are even on the team is beyond me
Agreed. See more of a role for Reeves than CJ at this point.Don’t get the Reaves hate. He started off slow last year due to injury but came back strong and did the exact job he was brought here to do as a 4th liner for 1.35 mill. Jarnkrok I agree needs to go
My problem with Reaves is that the only place to play him on is the fourth line. If we do that, then we neutralize that line's ability to act as a primary shutdown weapon. If we played something like Lorenz - Kampf - Holmberg, you could throw them out in their own end and not worry so much about it. Reaves needs to be sheltered, and he doesn't provide anything offensively.Don’t get the Reaves hate. He started off slow last year due to injury but came back strong and did the exact job he was brought here to do as a 4th liner for 1.35 mill. Jarnkrok I agree needs to go
50 regular season games should probably be the limit for Reaves. He made a big playoff blunder vs the Bruins, which isn't good for a guy whose career playoff contribution has been close to non-existent.Don’t get the Reaves hate. He started off slow last year due to injury but came back strong and did the exact job he was brought here to do as a 4th liner for 1.35 mill.
50 regular season games should probably be the limit for Reaves. He made a big playoff blunder vs the Bruins, which isn't good for a guy whose career playoff contribution has been close to non-existent.
I'm fine with him on the team as long as he can play like he did in the last part of 23-24.Yes he did. He’s very unlikely to play in the playoffs but overall in that series he was pretty impactful. That being said I stick to my point that for his cap and role he does what he was expected. If you prefer to go into the season without this type of player that’s a different story, but I personally don’t. Even if he doesn’t play every game, having him around to loop in to rivalry games helps us. We’re pretty soft team all things considered.
50 regular season games should probably be the limit for Reaves. He made a big playoff blunder vs the Bruins, which isn't good for a guy whose career playoff contribution has been close to non-existent.
Jarnkrok is the most replaceable player there is. At least Reaves provides something unique.Agreed. See more of a role for Reeves than CJ at this point.
Jarnkrok is the most replaceable player there is. At least Reaves provides something unique.
Jarnkrok is the most replaceable player there is. At least Reaves provides something unique.
He has the stats of a #6 stay at home defenseman in the playoffs.Jarnkrok is versatile and pretty smart out there but yeah, he makes Alex Kerfoot look dynamic in comparison.
He has the stats of a #6 stay at home defenseman in the playoffs.
Really? A 20/20 guy for $2m/year. Probably one of the best value contracts in the league.Jarnkrok is the most replaceable player there is. At least Reaves provides something unique.
Check playoff stats...Really? A 20/20 guy for $2m/year. Probably one of the best value contracts in the league.
I can confidently say Jarnkrok played better than Marner. That said Leafs can trade him because he has value, Reaves and Kampf would cost them assets to move.Check playoff stats...
Wow. Ok...5 goals in 93 playoff games. 0 points in the last 7 games last series. Guy was invisible. I won't be surprised if we have to pay to get rid of him. Hopefully not but I could see it.I can confidently say Jarnkrok played better than Marner. That said Leafs can trade him because he has value, Reaves and Kampf would cost them assets to move.
yea because marner was casper the ghost and jarncock played some tough minutesI can confidently say Jarnkrok played better than Marner. That said Leafs can trade him because he has value, Reaves and Kampf would cost them assets to move.
No, it gets worse. We are 1 million over cap. I have bad news. Berube Reeves yes. Jarnkrok no. It makes no sense to keep him and stifle cheap young. Might get a 4th rounder after camp.Jarnkrok is below Robertson and McMann on the depth chart, so if Pacioretty is sticking around, Jarnkrok is on the outside of the top 9. $2.1 million is a lot for a small winger who probably isn’t good enough to make our top 9 anymore and brings no physicality.
It's almost like this stuff has to play itself out before we know what will happen.No, it gets worse. We are 1 million over cap. I have bad news. Berube Reeves yes. Jarnkrok no. It makes no sense to keep him and stifle cheap young. Might get a 4th rounder after camp.