RodTheBawd
Registered User
- Oct 16, 2013
- 5,529
- 8,604
Love the different arguements that we have to see about that trade.
On one hand, we have guys telling us that our GM is an idiot and that we lost that trade big time. On the other hand we have people telling us that Hall's value was only Larsson, so the rest of our players have no value. Which is it? Did we lose huge on value, or was it fair value and our players are next to worthless?
I don't think the trade was that bad, as most reasonable people agree. What was bad was what you and others would throw out as "fair value" for Hall, and what you got in reality.