MOGlLNY
Registered User
- Jan 5, 2008
- 12,626
- 13,221
I don't mind it. I'm just sour losing Savoie as he was my favorite prospect. I'll need to read up on McLeod. My best friends a die hard Oilers fan & he said we got a good one for sure
Krebs will not knock Lafferty off that 4th line spot. Lindy wants big, fast hitters on the 4th line.I hope they are going to use McLeod as 4C and Krebs as 3C. Krebs going?
Oiler fan here - is there something about Savoie I'm missing that would make him not that attractive? All I know is he scores and has a ton of skill.
That we drafted 5 more top forwards since his pick was madeOiler fan here - is there something about Savoie I'm missing that would make him not that attractive? All I know is he scores and has a ton of skill.
Can anyone tell me more about Ryan McLeod?
wow holy f***ing shit.
Got a need! Well done.
Or a top-4 D =0Only makes sense if Krebs is in a package for a top 6 forward?
It's actually a decent move....but it requires another move.
I think if you put together the venn diagram of people that think Adams overpaid and people who wanted to address the center position with a 3c/roster player, there wont' be much overlap.Love these boards so much. 2 trades filling holes that OMG FIRE ADAMS IF HE DOESNT FILL. And there’s still complaining.
Wouldn’t read too deeply into it. Sabres have a lot of prospects with very similar sets and sizes. More of numbers game and organizational needs than attractiveness.Oiler fan here - is there something about Savoie I'm missing that would make him not that attractive? All I know is he scores and has a ton of skill.