Gabrielor
Registered User
It never made since.So the narrative that they'd rather take the second round pick was bogus?
This is why I dont get too emotionally involved in speculation.
It never made since.So the narrative that they'd rather take the second round pick was bogus?
This is why I dont get too emotionally involved in speculation.
They could try to incentivize him to pick their preference by how they structure bonuses, sure. But consider also that Johnson is far more likely to actually achieve his performance bonuses in 2025-26 (year three of an ELC that starts next season) than he is in either of the next two years. When you also consider that if his ELC starts this season, he's probably more likely to accept a QO when it expires than sign a big extension right away, it could quite possibly end up actually costing the Sabres more money in the long run if they get their way.Wholly agree with full post.
Moreover, since you are this boards resident CBA guru, assuming the Sabres prefer option #2, the only carrot I assume they can offer is bonus structure for the ELC, which they could perhaps low-ball on option #1 as a pseudo-stick.
So, perhaps more explicitly the options are as above, with these additions:
1) [burn a year] but get a reduced or bare-minimum bonus structure for years 2 & 3.
2) [take the ATO, don't burn a year] but with a richer / richest possible bonus structure for your 1st (3) NHL years.
3) [bonuses N/A with BUF]
I don't know that we have precedent for BUF being that strong-armed in negotiations, but I have to believe it's a possibility.
Dreger appearance:The Dreger bit - Brisson is the advisor, and yes he spoke with Dreger last night. That guy again.
The Dreger bit - Brisson is the advisor, and yes he spoke with Dreger last night. That guy again.
So the narrative that they'd rather take the second round pick was bogus?
This is why I dont get too emotionally involved in speculation.
I don't recall any other GM who had mouthpieces getting their narratives out to the local market quicker than Adams has.
Huh? The Sabres front office doesn't leak much at all. Like.....they're pretty air tight.
There's a big difference between Peca/Hasek/Eichel. Peca was beloved by everyone. Hasek could be a jerk, but he was the best goalie in Sabres history.There is a concerted effort here to control how the local media covers the Sabres, moreso since Adams took over than any other GM in memory. It really was obvious when the Eichel situation broke open. The local media turned on Eichel quicker than I have ever seen. It didn't happen with Peca, it didn't happen with Hasek. Just magically, the problem wasn't ownership, it wasn't management, it was Eichel all along.
Dreger talking out of his ass. He's talking like the Sabres have another year on Johnson. He doesn't even know the situation.Dreger appearance:
If someone else posted this pls dlt, just have a moment on break
Dreger talking out of his ass.
A combination of Eichel never doing anything to make the team better and Eichel having Sabres alum basically lined up to call him an asshole, did the work without Adams having to do anything.It's not really "leaks", it's talking points to drive the media narratives and online discussion. In this specific example, the idea of that the Sabres were 'deciding between signing him or taking the picks' magically surfaced when Johnson didn't sign immediately. It wasn't reported anywhere that taking the pick was even a consideration. It's like how the broadcast talking points switched to ' the future is bright' when the Sabres dropped out of the playoff race in mid march.
There is a concerted effort here to control how the local media covers the Sabres, moreso since Adams took over than any other GM in memory. It really was obvious when the Eichel situation broke open. The local media turned on Eichel quicker than I have ever seen. It didn't happen with Peca, it didn't happen with Hasek. Just magically, the problem wasn't ownership, it wasn't management, it was Eichel all along.
Eichel is a massive asshole. take that as insider info.A combination of Eichel never doing anything to make the team better and Eichel having Sabres alum basically lined up to call him an asshole, did the work without Adams having to do anything.
A combination of Eichel never doing anything to make the team better and Eichel having Sabres alum basically lined up to call him an asshole, did the work without Adams having to do anything.
It's not really "leaks", it's talking points to drive the media narratives and online discussion. In this specific example, the idea of that the Sabres were 'deciding between signing him or taking the picks' magically surfaced when Johnson didn't sign immediately. It wasn't reported anywhere that taking the pick was even a consideration. It's like how the broadcast talking points switched to ' the future is bright' when the Sabres dropped out of the playoff race in mid march.
There is a concerted effort here to control how the local media covers the Sabres, moreso since Adams took over than any other GM in memory. It really was obvious when the Eichel situation broke open. The local media turned on Eichel quicker than I have ever seen. It didn't happen with Peca, it didn't happen with Hasek. Just magically, the problem wasn't ownership, it wasn't management, it was Eichel all along.
Every NCAA player can technically play five seasons if they were on a roster during the 2019-20 season.Dreger talking out of his ass. He's talking like the Sabres have another year on Johnson. He doesn't even know the situation.
His rights being traded wouldn't change anything about his ability to go to FA though.Perhaps he made it look like he would sign so his rights would not get traded at the deadline, if he does not sign he can pick his organization. That's why that "Sabre's might be happy with the pick" thing put out there by a few people was odd If KA got played.
I doubt there is a trade that really makes sense unless it was Johnson for a '23 3rd which gets Buffalo the pick a year sooner than the comp pick. And you lose value by accelerating the pick a year.His rights being traded wouldn't change anything about his ability to go to FA though.
Also anybody trading for his rights would have to offer up at least a 2nd rnd pick to make it worthwhile for the sabres. So even if the sabres knew he wasn't signing all along, doubtful they could find a buyer to give more value than just letting him walk.
The little media echo chamber this front office has assembled is probably the most impressive thing they've done. I don't recall any other GM who had mouthpieces getting their narratives out to the local market quicker than Adams has.
It's not really "leaks", it's talking points to drive the media narratives and online discussion. In this specific example, the idea of that the Sabres were 'deciding between signing him or taking the picks' magically surfaced when Johnson didn't sign immediately. It wasn't reported anywhere that taking the pick was even a consideration.
I doubt there is a trade that really makes sense unless it was Johnson for a '23 3rd which gets Buffalo the pick a year sooner than the comp pick. And you lose value by accelerating the pick a year.
It’s a scenario…..
You might be able to squeeze a higher 2nd from Anaheim, San Jose or LA if they feel it has some sort negotiating advantage and if he wants to play out west but other than that ya its gonna be tough to get any more value out of him.His rights being traded wouldn't change anything about his ability to go to FA though.
Also anybody trading for his rights would have to offer up at least a 2nd rnd pick to make it worthwhile for the sabres. So even if the sabres knew he wasn't signing all along, doubtful they could find a buyer to give more value than just letting him walk.
Not necessarily- remember this is trading for a developed player not a pick or pick trade. The player is more accelerated than that pick and at least an nhl depth d - therefore it probably has more worth than you say. It’s not just a 2024 2 for a pick this year.
A situation even...It’s a scenario…..