EichelFan15
Registered User
- May 7, 2021
- 189
- 208
After being taken off the first line he is only getting 5 mins of ice time the last couple games.Why would they do that ? He seems to be doing fine
After being taken off the first line he is only getting 5 mins of ice time the last couple games.Why would they do that ? He seems to be doing fine
After being taken off the first line he is only getting 5 mins of ice time the last couple games.
He will get more minutes against weaker teams. Against formidable opposition getting 5 minutes per game may not be the best option for him while he could play in worse leagues at 16(!!!). Giving him VHL AND MHL time might be a good development option.Why would they do that ? He seems to be doing fine
He dominated in the MHL last season one could claim leading the league in goals scored. It is probably a better option to send him to the VHL where a lot of 2022 draft class prospects are playing already.At what point do they just send Michkov back to the MHL?
I feel like being down a couple goals is exactly when you would want to play your dynamic (young) players but maybe shorten the bench if you were protecting a close lead.Michkov is (still) not able to keep up physically (no surprise). Bragin took him out against Yekaterinburg after his imo strongest shift with a lot of O time. But at some point SKA was down 0:3 and with a 16 year old it is difficult to exert physical pressure on the opponent, whereby Michkov is really not afraid of physical contact. Against Novgorod the game went against SKA from the start on… These are simply no conditions to give a 16 year old a lot of ice time. He can definitely keep up with the pace of the KHL.
He is 16. How often do we need to remind ourselves really? He is not yet a young dynamic player who can change the outcome of the game in the KHL. Maybe in the VHL he would be that already.I feel like being down a couple goals is exactly when you would want to play your dynamic (young) players but maybe shorten the bench if you were protecting a close lead.
My comment wasn’t a critique of Michkov but rather how the coach is utilizing him. If you are down 3-0 why not play the most prolific young scorer to come along in years. Worst case he is a defensive liability and gets scored against and you lose a game you were probably going to anyways. Best case he generates offence, sparks the team and builds confidence which only helps the team in the long run. Just my 2 cents on how I would deploy Michkov in that situation. He has shown he can produce when given the opportunity - albeit in a blowout to a weak opponent.He is 16. How often do we need to remind ourselves really? He is not yet a young dynamic player who can change the outcome of the game in the KHL. Maybe in the VHL he would be that already.
My comment wasn’t a critique of Michkov but rather how the coach is utilizing him. If you are down 3-0 why not play the most prolific young scorer to come along in years. Worst case he is a defensive liability and gets scored against and you lose a game you were probably going to anyways. Best case he generates offence, sparks the team and builds confidence which only helps the team in the long run. Just my 2 cents on how I would deploy Michkov in that situation. He has shown he can produce when given the opportunity - albeit in a blowout to a weak opponent.
The most prolific young scorer on the team is still Marchenko.People get way too exited over some early limited success for Michkov.My comment wasn’t a critique of Michkov but rather how the coach is utilizing him. If you are down 3-0 why not play the most prolific young scorer to come along in years. Worst case he is a defensive liability and gets scored against and you lose a game you were probably going to anyways. Best case he generates offence, sparks the team and builds confidence which only helps the team in the long run. Just my 2 cents on how I would deploy Michkov in that situation. He has shown he can produce when given the opportunity - albeit in a blowout to a weak opponent.
SKA should stop being stupid crazy and just send people where they belong: Morozov to KHL, Michkov and Chibrikov to the VHL. It's nice they gave kids a taste but come on.
Yeah, the issue is that SKA have like 15 other forwards that don't play everynight (or at all) because Michkov does. Someone like Groshev played 11 minutes this season, Morozov is in the VHL. Michkov isn't getting the minutes he's getting on merit. He does because he is the golden boy. Ok, the point was made - doors of the men's team are open to him. Now, time to get back to normal.I disagree. Playing time is a bit exaggerated in my opinion. We just saw with Wright that under certain circumstances and training conditions he lost not a piece despite less than a second of play in the entire regular season. Michkov has the opportunity to train at a very high level and gain experience in the first team. Bragin trusts him (as much as he can trust a 16 year old). He was allowed to play in critical situations and also was the playmaker on his PP unit in the first games. I think Bragin does believe in him. It is also good for Michkov's personal development to learn that nothing is free in life and that he has to earn his spot. He should stay where he is.
Let's have this one sorted out correctly though. Morozov is a center, so he is by design not taken away a spot by Michkov. He is in the VHL because he is on thetrading block. It is official and confirmed. He refused to resign and SKA is looking to move him.Yeah, the issue is that SKA have like 15 other forwards that don't play everynight (or at all) because Michkov does. Someone like Groshev played 11 minutes this season, Morozov is in the VHL. Michkov isn't getting the minutes he's getting on merit. He does because he is the golden boy. Ok, the point was made - doors of the men's team are open to him. Now, time to get back to normal.
Svechkov and Chibrikov are both missing games.Let's have this one sorted out correctly though. Morozov is a center, so he is by design not taken away a spot by Michkov. He is in the VHL because he is on thetrading block. It is official and confirmed. He refused to resign and SKA is looking to move him.
Then Michkov is certainly one of the best if not the best U20 option. So I don't see how he is taking spots away from anyone comparable.
Again, Svechkov is a center.Svechkov and Chibrikov are both missing games.
In the two games he's played Svechkov has been on the wing.Again, Svechkov is a center.
And both Svechkov and Chibrikov are at this point arguably on the same level.
Still same level player. They will have to share spots, move down to the VHL or play against weaker teams. It will hit Michkov just the same as everybody else going forward I suppose. THe Russia-Canada-Series is not a thing again, so there will be some more KHL action for all of them.In the two games he's played Svechkov has been on the wing.
Let's have this sorted out correctly though. The fact that SKA are looking to move him because he refused to sign is neither official nor confirmed. All that has been said is that they are "looking at trade options" which means next to nothing. Furthermore, the center thing is irrelevant at this point. With the number of centers, they have some of them are bound to play wing. Khusnutdinov is a center as well, isn't he? It's about getting the best players on the ice.Let's have this one sorted out correctly though. Morozov is a center, so he is by design not taken away a spot by Michkov. He is in the VHL because he is on thetrading block. It is official and confirmed. He refused to resign and SKA is looking to move him.
I disagree. Playing time is a bit exaggerated in my opinion. We just saw with Wright that under certain circumstances and training conditions he lost not a piece despite less than a second of play in the entire regular season. Michkov has the opportunity to train at a very high level and gain experience in the first team. Bragin trusts him (as much as he can trust a 16 year old). He was allowed to play in critical situations and also was the playmaker on his PP unit in the first games. I think Bragin does believe in him. It is also good for Michkov's personal development to learn that nothing is free in life and that he has to earn his spot. He should stay where he is.
What is the actual evidence of that?He’s too good for lower leagues
Let's have this sorted out correctly though. The fact that SKA are looking to move him because he refused to sign is neither official nor confirmed.
All that has been said is that they are "looking at trade options" which means next to nothing.
Furthermore, the center thing is irrelevant at this point. With the number of centers, they have some of them are bound to play wing. Khusnutdinov is a center as well, isn't he? It's about getting the best players on the ice.
SKA has 16 forwards over 20 who are clearly kinda too good for the VHL (plus Khusnutdinov who is U20 but firmly first team member at this point). Including Groshev, Bardakov, Morozov. Saying Michkov isn't taking away anyone's spot is just.. weird.
I do not insist on that. It is though a more complicated issue of conflicting schedules and stuff like that.I would understand insisting on him playing in the KHL if he was tearing VHL apart but he hasn't played a single game there.
Also, as someone who critiques "NA media narratives" so much (rightfully so most of the time) it's weird that you got yourself hooked on this "looking to trade Morozov because he refused extension" idea which is nothing more than a media narrative as well. Marchenko is in the exact same situation, why isn't he in the VHL then?
My point exactly. Furthermore, if SKA really wanted to trade him he would be gone already, literally every team in the league wants the Russian top-6 center paid a reasonable salary (his first real pro contract). So all this dancing around, as you said, there are obviously issues within SKA with Morozov for whatever reason but I'm really not sure it's about his extension and I'm also not sure they are as dead set on trading him as implied.there is OBVIOUSLY more to it than just the contract talks