theVladiator
Registered User
- May 26, 2018
- 1,270
- 1,527
Draisaitl had better Junior #'s than Bennett...
Thank you for correcting me, it certainly wasn't a good example of points based bias.
Draisaitl had better Junior #'s than Bennett...
Haha well congrats on not being egotistical and getting upset. Wasn't trying to invalidate your opinion just noticed that issue. I wish more people could have discussions like these!Thank you for correcting me, it certainly wasn't a good example of points based bias.
Skating encompasses various styles. There’s speed, edgework, quickness, shiftiness, balance for example.I didn't say that you need elite skating to be an elite player. When you compare a player's skill-set pre draft, you weigh the important parts of the game. Skating is one of those things. A lot will claim Hughes has a bad shot and isn't a good goal-scorer, but I think they mean that relative to the other top prospects. If you look at his goal tallies, it would be crazy to say he's not going to be at least an above-average goal-scorer in the NHL. But at the top of these drafts, not being elite in an area is worth mentioning. Most of the players in the top 5 of most drafts are elite in most areas of the game. I also mentioned three parts of the game that I don't think Podkolzin is good at, not one.
Well, I recently watched Podkolzin's MHL playoff game, where he scored a goal and an assist, against Almaz where his team won 5-0, and so I'll talk about it.
...
MHL is a far weaker league than CHL, and Podkolzin's performance in MHL is very weak.
I’ll admit I don’t have Podkolzin top 5 let alone top 3 like most scouting services but man this thread is exactly like Tkachuks from last year. His Iq is fine, good enough to be a top 5-10 pick.
The U18 tournament will answer a lot of questions. If he dominates his peers we'll know what's what.
Will it? He’s dominated the other international tournaments. Some of the questions have come from his production with his club team.
It may answer some questions, but some will linger (as in what is his ultimate time frame to come to NA). I am sure this will impact the analysis for some teams more than others.
The U18 tournament is a major factor in scouting decisions for the NHL draft, quite possibly the biggest. If Podkolzin dominates this tournament literally no one will care about the MHL, except for "Pavel Buchnevich."
I think it is two separate issues, one of which focuses on his development in the Russian leagues, which I believe may be less of a concern. The other issue is his timeline for coming to NA to play. My understanding is that he is signed for two more years. Does he come over at that point or does he decide he wants to remain in Russia longer? He probably does not know himself at this point. This will impact how some teams evaluate him, the question is to what degree. It certainly will impact how teams view him for purposes of using a top-5 pick.
The Russian factor still exists.
Potentially, I think it exists for practical concerns, as in when can we get this prospect into our organization. Are we potentially willing to spend a top-5 pick on a prospect that may not be in our organization for 3-4 years? For some GMs, they are probably concerned about not having a job that far down the line.
It will be interesting. I did not think this would be the case at first, but I could see Colorado taking him at pick number 3 or 4. Sakic has the ultimate job security and the organization has recently started acquiring/drafting Russian players more than in the past. The Avs have also taken some risks with their more recent selections (AJHL, BCHL, and prospects playing in Liiga and the Czech men's league).
Teams usually try to form relationships with players they draft by talking to them and getting a sense of their personality and future direction. If they don't get this with Podkolzin I think he might drop.
He's not super talented like Hughes or Kakko and I think after the first two picks there's a lot of ambiguity anyway. A team like the Rags would be a natural fit because no Russian can turn down NY.
Potentially, I think it exists for practical concerns, as in when can we get this prospect into our organization. Are we potentially willing to spend a top-5 pick on a prospect that may not be in our organization for 3-4 years? For some GMs, they are probably concerned about not having a job that far down the line.
It will be interesting. I did not think this would be the case at first, but I could see Colorado taking him at pick number 3 or 4. Sakic has the ultimate job security and the organization has recently started acquiring/drafting Russian players more than in the past. The Avs have also taken some risks with their more recent selections (AJHL, BCHL, and prospects playing in Liiga and the Czech men's league).