The Crypto Guy
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2017
- 29,346
- 39,174
That +8 is ridiculous.7 points in 4 games and +8, not too shabby.
Not saying his line hasn't been great but it would be interesting to see someone like Barkov centering him and how much points would he have then.
Finland's scored 12 goals, on ice for 10 for. Also, all his scoring has been in even strength. Oftentimes, when these youngsters have skill but struggle with the overall play they might find some success on PP but struggle 5v5, that's not been the case for Kakko.That +8 is ridiculous.
7 points in 4 games and +8, not too shabby.
Not saying his line hasn't been great but it would be interesting to see someone like Barkov centering him and how much points would he have then.
Kakko is better now
Hughes has higher ceiling
Rantanen - Barkov - KakkoImagine Rantanen - Barkov - Kakko lineup in a few years.. Ridicilous
insane goal. What a player
Hughes is like 170cm.Exactly how he has?
& How does he have so much more room to grow than Kakko, are guys expecting him to be 200lbs in his prime?
With that frame.
Constantly people keep saying higher ceiling and more room to grow without explaining it, just saying it like it was decided in 2014.
Seeing him and i wonder if he does go #1. If he were a C? I think he would.
Just like on his similar Liiga goal, right? The goalie was saving a shot.Lol that was a good goal, but was absolutely atrocious defense... not even going to comment on the goalie coming 10 feet out of his own net for no apparent reason.
It's accurate, though. But yeah, he's very no-nonsense.Kakko just said in an interview that "I would never shoot like that, I tried to pass and good it went in"
(Pesonen goal)
I love this guy.
This is in my opinion a bit useless assuming. We can’t know if that would even be a perfect match. And anyway it would also still depend on who would be the 3rd player in that line.7 points in 4 games and +8, not too shabby.
Not saying his line hasn't been great but it would be interesting to see someone like Barkov centering him and how much points would he have then.
Hughes is like 170cm.
So,in the same room, he has a lot of space to grow...
It's useless assuming? No it's not, where's the sense in assuming by default they wouldn't be good together? Barkov's handedness is a good fit with Kakko's.This is in my opinion a bit useless assuming. We can’t know if that would even be a perfect match. And anyway it would also still depend on who would be the 3rd player in that line.
He has done it before..
That I would understand if Kakko’s line would be clearly dysfunctional and his linemates completely carried by Kakko. But this hasn’t definitely been the case. Kakko has been the best player in his line for sure, but still Manninen and Pesonen have also played well and done their jobs very well.
7 points in 4 games and +8, not too shabby.
Not saying his line hasn't been great but it would be interesting to see someone like Barkov centering him and how much points would he have then.
7 points in 4 games and +8, not too shabby.
Not saying his line hasn't been great but it would be interesting to see someone like Barkov centering him and how much points would he have then.
Still it’s assuming until we have really seen them play together. Line chemistry doesn't always work in the way that you just put your most skilled players together and assume that it is the best possible line combination. Great line chemistry is much more than just putting extremely skilled players to play together.It's useless assuming? No it's not, where's the sense in assuming by default they wouldn't be good together? Barkov's handedness is a good fit with Kakko's.