Flynn84
Registered User
- Apr 27, 2006
- 1,030
- 234
So he's not 5'11"?Very small out there and didn't look any bigger than Conir Garland
So he's not 5'11"?Very small out there and didn't look any bigger than Conir Garland
I would say there is no point for him to play junior next year. Even though many Canadians and Americans who dominate in the same way stay in junior bc they have to, he has good leagues at home to return to in the VHL and KHL.
So he's not 5'11"?
I don't care where he is ranked or is drafted, Abramov is Kucherov-level good.
svechnikov looks good there too. it didn't prevent him from looking (being) like a complete bust at the wjcAnother hat trick today. 65 in 45.
svechnikov looks good there too. it didn't prevent him from looking (being) like a complete bust at the wjc
It's not about CHL production though. I mean, Yakupov's numbers were pretty good as well. Of course, I hope Abramov won't be another Yakupov.
Abramov is on par to match Yakupov's rookie number in the OHL, and Yak was the #1 overall pick in the NHL. Abramov is slated as a 2nd rounder, because of his size, I guess. The expectations will be lower than Yakupov, but still, I honestly cannot see Abramov fail, and I can't see him putting low numbers like Yakupov has done in the NHL.
Abramov is extremely talented, and I wouldn't be surprised if a team took him top-20 in the 1st round. He will be in the NHL very soon, and he will be an offensive machine.
He is going to be a very good player IMO. Perhaps the most underrated player in the draft right now. Crazy how little talk he is garnering.
It is easy to say when Yakupov is not doing so well in the NHL for a 1st overall pick.And I like him way more than Yakupov.
He's definitely great and I like him very much but I don't know if stats in the juniors could mean a lot.1+2 today. 71 pts in 47 games. 10+10 in last 10 games. And he's 56th on list of prospects who play in NA...
Connor Garland had brilliant stats last season but was drafted pretty low.
Scouts probably can see some flaws besides size.
What flaws they can see in Abramov's skills? It is definitely not skating. Skating issues was probably a reason Timashov was drafted lower than someone expected.
true, and lol at comparing him to yak. at the same age yak looked dumb as a mule when compared to abramovDespite the fact that he was already a year older than Abramov now. And he's without a doubt even smaller than Abramov.
From what I saw I really didn't notice any flaws in his game. He has yet to prove his defensive play and become stronger overall but it's typical for the young guns like him. He has incredible tools and toolbox too. He not always plays like an ordinary teen, there is a lot of things in his game that usually natural for profesional hockey, not for juniors. He's brave guy who's never affraid to go in the dirty zones and scores dirty goals not paying attention to his size. He's also fast and strong on his skates. Maybe there are some local guys, who actually are more knowledgeable than I am and maybe any of these guys will be able to write more bout Abramov?
I always thought that draft place doesn't mean anything. If you have some skills and hardworking enough you will be a good player regardless of your draft position. Kucherov was selected in the late second. Why? Russian factor? Not only I believe. Tarasenko, Kuznetsov, Nichushkin - all of them are first rounders despite the fact at the time they all were playing in Russia. IMO Kuch was overlooked by scouts and apparently Abramov is too. But both of them have all talents in the world and one of them slowly becomes one of the best wingers in NHL.
It is easy to say when Yakupov is not doing so well in the NHL for a 1st overall pick.