- Mar 10, 2010
- 35,554
- 33,894
How many of those teams are there?
Someone (I think on the main boards?) did a deep dive on this with contracts of varying amounts in each city. The savings weren't as great as I thought they'd be. For one, only a player's home games are taxed where they play. Road games are taxed according to where they're played. Signing bonuses get around that though
All Canadian markets were near the bottom in net pay, but the Cali and Metro area teams weren't far behind
I recall this as well. It's not nearly as straightforward as most would think. There are obviously markets where the advantage is larger but some (some of them surprising) as you point out where it is rather negligible.
I'd think the bigger advantage would be for those low tax states where players are being paid more by bonuses or where the contract isn't a standard contract. The Jets seldom do signing bonuses and I expect a fair bit of that has to do with the fact that it would be taxed at the marginal rate for Manitoba/Canada. For the Jets players, having half your games taxed in other markets is probably beneficial.
When it comes to the tax advantage, I think as you get older, if you are really talented and you can kind of pick and choose it becomes a factor. When you are trying to break in and establish yourself I think it should be the least of your worries.