Nobody except casual fans cares about golds in WJCs as a stat. I rather want to see how many stars for Team Russia those teams produced. The golds are a fine gimmick on gameday. The elimination games are fun to watch. How many golds in how many years I couldn't care less about. The Swedes have won 54 round robin games in a row and went home without medals this time and many times before during that span. They still have a very potent development system and do not have to worry about supply of players for the senior NT.How come? Its surprising that such a big hockey-nation just have 1 gold in 10 years.
People always say Sweden are chocking, why is it so quiet about the fact that Russia, that is a even bigger hockey-nation than Sweden have 1 gold in 10 years? Even Finland have more golds than Russia these last 10 years.
The most "systemic" ussue is probably a bad decision about coaching this year.That stat in particular is a bit about luck considering how many gold medals have been decided by late game bounces.
There is I think a systemic issue with Russian hockey, if you watched yesterday and saw the across the board talent discrepancy between Russia and Canada you would have seen it. But measuring the problem in medal counts is foolish.
Im sure a bunch of finns and swedes want to think theyve caught russia but they havent.
Edit.... WHC??? Lol. Thats a joke and a waste of time.
How is WHC a joke? Have you seen russian rosters every year?Im sure a bunch of finns and swedes want to think theyve caught russia but they havent.
Edit.... WHC??? Lol. Thats a joke and a waste of time.
The WHC is far from a joke. It is very important in every European country where hockey is played. Has been at least 40-50 years.
If you want to talk about joke tourneys, turn towards the embarrassment called Spengler Cup or the EHT tourney. Those have F/G level no-name teams, no prestige and generate very little interest.
Russia is not the USSR. I know they weren't in the tournament this year, but if you take even the best player from Latvia, Belarus, maybe Kazakhstan....and put them on the current Russian roster, likely makes a pretty big difference.
You also need to take age into consideration. Ovie is 35, Malkin 34, Panarin/Kuznetsov getting really close to 30. I mean they still can be at the top for many years, but Finnish and Swedish core are much younger. So this edge what Russia currently has with forwards is getting closer every year.Easy, they've still got the most high end talent other than Canada, in the world. It seems to be a reasonably thin pool, but Ovechkin, Malkin, Panarin, Kucherov, Kuznetsov, Svechnikov, Dadonov on forward, Provorov, Sergachev.... (D isn't great), Vasilevski in net (plus Varlamov, Bobrovsky, Khudobin, Shesterkin, and Samsonov).
I can't see Finland or Sweden icing soemthing that beats that. Not remotely close at forward. The top Finn scorer last year was Aho, with one less point than Ovechkin (10 less goals).... whoch would be 5th in their scoring.
As much as Russia blows Sweden's forwards away, Sweden blows their Defense away. So it gets pretty close, especially with goaltending going .
WHC is not best on best. Maybe that is why Europeans put such importance on it? Much better chance to win if Canada's best players are not available?
Spengler Cup is an invitational tournament. It's not any form of best teams meeting. It's a tournament played over holidays btw. Teams have to want to give up their holidays to participate in it. Its easy for us to say "of course they will" when it's just something on TV. But spending a week either away from your family or having to still work when you had a vacation planned. Not to mention for very little interest they sure seem to have a hard time not selling tickets.
WHC is not best on best. Maybe that is why Europeans put such importance on it? Much better chance to win if Canada's best players are not available?
Spengler Cup is an invitational tournament. It's not any form of best teams meeting. It's a tournament played over holidays btw. Teams have to want to give up their holidays to participate in it. Its easy for us to say "of course they will" when it's just something on TV. But spending a week either away from your family or having to still work when you had a vacation planned. Not to mention for very little interest they sure seem to have a hard time not selling tickets.
Would be almost no difference, and it was the same in USSR times, the only big soviet star who was not from Russia was Balderis
Doesn't need to be a big star though. If a guy who plays on the top line gets bumped down to second or third line because of some players coming in, that strengthens the team. It's about the depth. It doesn't take superstars. Just good players that adds depth.
Not mention Arturs Irbe and Sandis Ozolinsh would have probably helped the "Russian" teams during their days.
WHC is not best on best. Maybe that is why Europeans put such importance on it? Much better chance to win if Canada's best players are not available?
The situation in Russian junior hockey is not as bad as it looks.
This team's play was mediocre "thanks" to that fool Larionov's coaching (I was skeptical about him from the beginning. Everything that Larionov touches turns into sh1t. He has ruined too many Russian prospects as a "player agent" and now he ruined this WJC team with his incompetent "coaching").
Last year, under Bragin, Russia was the best team in the WJC tournament. And Russia has almost always medaled in this tournament during the last ten years or so. Russia is, and will be, competitive in this tournament in the future as well.
But there are some deep problems in Russian hockey, and Russia is not as good a hockey country as it should be given its size and number of players and rinks. That is for certain. One thing is that Russia does not develop enough good centers and defensemen. Since Datsyuk and Malkin Russia has not produced any really good centermen (Kuznetsov was a winger in Russia and turned into a center in the NHL). And as far as I know it there are no great center prospects in the horizon either. Michkov and Miroschnichenko are, of course, both wingers. It seems that the most talented kids in Russia always want to play wing?
Russian hockey seems to lack leadership and vision. There are no people involved in Russian hockey with good mind and brains for the game. I don't trust that people like Rotenberg will lead Russia into glory. And Tretiak is just a mascot. Russia needs new Tarasovs and Tikhonovs. But where to find them?
As it was already mentioned, lack of best players will affect the ones with less depth more, and both Canada and USA have great depth.
Nobody thinks that WHC is equal to Olympics with NHL, but it is a prestigious tournament and it is taken very seriously, and oh the irony, the most serious nation in their attitude to WHC is exactly Russia, the one nation that you cant use WHC against because it is "a joke" according to the poster who called it this way originally.
To check if I am telling the truth just look up russian rosters for WHC in last 15 years, or look up, how many times did Ovechkin participate in a "joke".
Trust me, there would be maybe 1-2 players from outside of Russia on that team. Its not a difference maker
I'm not qualified to speak on the current state of Russian hockey but having watched several of their games this tournament the team was very vanilla. Not a lot of the creativity that I associate with Russia. Was Larionov out of his depth? Seems like it.
Rabid Ranger, I personally think Larionov has no idea what he is doing as coach. He's blabbering on about "Russian greatness" and "25 Russian mothers" and making them pass around in the defensive zone like he used to over 30 years ago, but what he perhaps doesn't realize is that the game has changed a whole lot since then. He doesn't seem to understand WJC hockey at all and he seems incapable of motivating young players (just look at the example of Podkolzin "rallying the troops" and him just standing there). Plus he never showed them any kind of tactical plan on the bench. He was lost during the game and never made any adjustments to what the other team was doing. Even when he was fully aware of how each team plays, he acted as if he had played the Czechs or Canada for the first time. He never took any responsibility for their horrible showing, just said "it's hockey, the referees, even the Great lose" and all that BS. I think he's a zero as a coach and that he needs to go.
Yeah, great players rarely make good much less great coaches. A lot of reasons for that.