How would we utilize Ristolainen if we got him? Ristolainen's numbers are screaming he needs to be sheltered, which means he can't play of the first pairing with Klefbom and both Risto and Nurse are too suspect defensively to sound like a good idea on the 2nd pair. Do we want $5.4M on the 3rd pairing or are we going to suppress Nurse going into his contract year hoping for some cap savings and pair Russell with Ristolainen?
There is so much boom/bust with Ristolainen he scares the living shit out of me, fear of missing out if he ever puts it all together and fear of being like Wile E Coyote holding a piece of dynamite too long and watching it blow up directly in my face. Given our cap outlook I don't think he's a risk we can take, despite the skills, his current level of effectiveness is essentially Marc Andre Bergeron (suspect 3rd pairing d-man who's good on the PP, 5 on 5 Risto is getting murdered).
While we don't have enough money for Gardiner either, I'm more down with getting him he's atleast a quality 2nd pairing d-man with a good breakout pass and despite some trademark brain farts sprinkled in, his average level of play is certainly higher than Ristolainen. Gardiner wouldn't scratch the same 1st unit PP d-man itch that Ristolainen would, but he's more of a sure thing. I see Gardiner more as a potential Nurse replacement, a more effective player than Nurse on the near term and while he's certain to be more expensive than Nurse this year, I think there is a decent chance that Gardiner is more likely to be inked to a value deal than Nurse.