Proposal: Rumours & Proposals Thread | Keep Nuge Forever

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheNumber4

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
44,214
55,146
Holland needs to put the cherry on top of this decent offseason by somehow improving our D corps. I know we got a lot of up and comers and need the spots. But lets not forget, Matt Benning sucks. Klef and Lars don't have the offensive chops to be true #1s. Russell, while a warrior, doesn't bring nearly enough. Seks is gone. By all accounts this is one bad D corps like usual. And I don't think injecting some rookies into this equation fixes anything, it'll hurt them and hurt the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I am the Liquor

Tobias Kahun

Registered User
Oct 3, 2017
44,954
56,234
Holland needs to put the cherry on top of this decent offseason by somehow improving our D corps. I know we got a lot of up and comers and need the spots. But lets not forget, Matt Benning sucks. Klef and Lars don't have the offensive chops to be true #1s. Russell, while a warrior, doesn't bring nearly enough. Seks is gone. By all accounts this is one bad D corps like usual. And I don't think injecting some rookies into this equation fixes anything, it'll hurt them and hurt the team.
Wrong.

Maybe your eyes are the things that suck.
 

nabob

We Love Eu-Gene!!
Aug 3, 2005
35,424
22,623
HF boards
Holland needs to put the cherry on top of this decent offseason by somehow improving our D corps. I know we got a lot of up and comers and need the spots. But lets not forget, Matt Benning sucks. Klef and Lars don't have the offensive chops to be true #1s. Russell, while a warrior, doesn't bring nearly enough. Seks is gone. By all accounts this is one bad D corps like usual. And I don't think injecting some rookies into this equation fixes anything, it'll hurt them and hurt the team.

Cap space...

Or are you suggesting we package Klefbom/Larsson with picks or prospects for an upgrade that doesn’t cost any more than they do against the cap?
 

SK13

non torsii subligarium
Jul 23, 2007
32,812
6,537
Edmonton
I believe any contract we sign would have to be about a million at most in order to keep the 1.5 cushion that Holland wants.

More like 2.5M or so to keep that 1.5M cap flexibility.

Few things about the capfriendly number. It's not taking into account the inevitable Manning burial. So the Oilers current cap number after that is 2.9M or so w/ Jones in the NHL and Manning in the AHL. Past that any signing they make will have to come at the expense of someone else (capfriendly is currently calculating their number based on a full 23 man roster). At least one of Cave, Jurco, Nygard or Brodziak will have to find themselves in the AHL and if the Oilers want: Two of them. Many teams carry 22 players instead of 23.

If it's Nygard for example, the Oilers would have nearly 4M in cap space.
 

Joey Moss

Registered User
Aug 29, 2008
36,208
8,048
Nashville signs Sissons 7 years... Poile loves those long term gamble contracts with lower cap.
 

joestevens29

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
54,051
17,176
I'm torn on these deals. What does it say about the player?

Is he smart because he is taking the sure thing?

or

Is he giving up on his career and fine with being what he is today?
 

Jimmi McJenkins

Sometimes miracles
Jan 12, 2006
78,669
41,651
Alberta
I'm torn on these deals. What does it say about the player?

Is he smart because he is taking the sure thing?

or

Is he giving up on his career and fine with being what he is today?
Sissons, he might view this the high point. He's 25, coming off 15 goals, he might develop further, but he also might be a 10-25 guy who's cashing in on what could be a career high.
 

lakai17

Registered User
Aug 10, 2006
20,966
1,346
You can see that he's fantastic in open ice, but he doesn't have much success when there are guys right on him. KHL has big rinks and the KHL defence makes AHL defence look good. Panarin can make plays in a phone booth, I don't see anything like that with Gusev, he's physically weak compared to Panarin or Kucherov. He also uses a long stick, which is easier to get away with in the KHL. His shot release is this kind of wide sweep around the side of his body. He won't have much space to use that.

Obviously he'd still be a great passer and transition player. But that makes him closer to Marcus Johansson than Artemi Panarin. The Oilers could nonetheless benefit from that kind of player, I'd support getting him if it just costs a 2nd rounder + B prospect or something like that.

He'd be lethal on two on one's with McDavid, boost the pp, great to have in overtime.
 

lakai17

Registered User
Aug 10, 2006
20,966
1,346
I'm torn on these deals. What does it say about the player?

Is he smart because he is taking the sure thing?

or

Is he giving up on his career and fine with being what he is today?

Smart taking that secure money. Say if he did improve a little more, it's not like he'd be getting that much more.

Good by Poile as well knowing he's a good depth forward that can also be an impact player when needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smokersarejokers

dem

Registered User
Mar 17, 2002
7,182
3,288
I'm torn on these deals. What does it say about the player?

Is he smart because he is taking the sure thing?

or

Is he giving up on his career and fine with being what he is today?


He just made 20 million dollars and is set for the rest of his life. He's in a great situation.
It doesn't get much better for Colton Sissons..


I'd start questioning if it was a player like Laine taking a long term 6 million dollar cap hit... because he is capable of getting so much more.
 

TheNumber4

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
44,214
55,146
Cap space...

Or are you suggesting we package Klefbom/Larsson with picks or prospects for an upgrade that doesn’t cost any more than they do against the cap?

Don’t know how Holland will get there. And none of us knew how’d he get Lucic outta here. Just saying the D corps needs to be upgrades as usual. Maybe one of our defenseman plus plus to get that forward. Maybe a forward plus plus to get there. Can’t say cap unless you know the pieces going out and who’s coming in. There are affordable defenseman that could help this D corps.
 

780il

edm
May 29, 2018
12,626
14,473
Edmonton AB
I'd take Sheahan over Brassard.

Brassard at this point is washed and it's possible he's not an NHL calibre player anymore. With Sheahan we know we at minimum are getting a defensively reliable 4c.
 

Ritchie Valens

Registered User
Sep 24, 2007
29,889
43,098
I wonder if the Oilers circle back to Patty. There was a tweet from Friedman or Shannon (I think) who said they were sniffing around on July 1st, which coincides with Treliving or Holland or whoever it was saying they started Lucic-Neal talks at the end of June.
 

belair

Win it for Ben!
Apr 9, 2010
39,623
23,329
Canada
I'd take Sheahan over Brassard.

Brassard at this point is washed and it's possible he's not an NHL calibre player anymore. With Sheahan we know we at minimum are getting a defensively reliable 4c.
Sheahan also had very good PK results last season and produced at the same rate Brassard did. Brassard doesn't PK at all, but saw regular PP time.

Brassard showed on three teams this past season that he struggles in that third line role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 780il

Shathar

Registered User
Jul 23, 2009
2,294
2,225
Moncton, New Brunswi
Though Gusev is intriguing, would u guys really give up solid assets for him (protected 1sts, etc)? There is so much that can go wrong with that player... I don't think I would.
 

The Nuge

Some say…
Jan 26, 2011
28,014
9,298
British Columbia
I'd take Sheahan over Brassard.

Brassard at this point is washed and it's possible he's not an NHL calibre player anymore. With Sheahan we know we at minimum are getting a defensively reliable 4c.

I feel like you could maybe get Sheahan for a steal at this point. If you you could go like 3-4 years at 1.5-2.0, you’ve got a contract that really won’t hurt you long term

Though Gusev is intriguing, would u guys really give up solid assets for him (protected 1sts, etc)? There is so much that can go wrong with that player... I don't think I would.

The only way I’m giving up at first is if there are conditions on the pick. I’d give up a 2nd, with the condition that it goes to a 1st if he puts up 60+ points and signs an extension. If both of those happen, a 1st isn’t an unreasonable price
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aerrol
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad