JeffSkinner53
Registered User
Kane for Marner 1 for 1?all I'll say for now is it's an eastern conference team and it would be a player coming back, also a large contract, that may have worn out his welcome in his current team.
Kane for Marner 1 for 1?all I'll say for now is it's an eastern conference team and it would be a player coming back, also a large contract, that may have worn out his welcome in his current team.
When you mentioned Washington, my first thought was Nick Jensen.all I'll say for now is it's an eastern conference team and it would be a player coming back, also a large contract, that may have worn out his welcome in his current team.
Interesting. I might keep Kane if its a long contract. Is the player good even though he's worn out his welcome?all I'll say for now is it's an eastern conference team and it would be a player coming back, also a large contract, that may have worn out his welcome in his current team.
Ma...Marner? Nahhh... well let's see.. is it a D or F?all I'll say for now is it's an eastern conference team and it would be a player coming back, also a large contract, that may have worn out his welcome in his current team.
I don't think you should trade Kane. Even when injured he's a 20 goal scorer.
It’s OV he’s realized the only way to get the record is to play with Connor and LeonWhen you mentioned Washington, my first thought was Nick Jensen.
all I'll say for now is it's an eastern conference team and it would be a player coming back, also a large contract, that may have worn out his welcome in his current team.
I wouldn't hate a retained Skinner, but would much rather they bought him out and have oilers sign him for pennies.Only guys that immediately come to mind out east are Skinner (who apparently won't waive, hence the potential buyout by BUF) and Marner. But the latter is completely out of the question. Can't be a D without moving out a problematic $9 million player first, so... ?? Still a bit confused. Kakko is a low price point so not him either. I guess trading one price point problem for another one. Still interesting, thanks for posting about it ChaoticOrange!
Are you saying this or is this an actual rumor?Kane for laine
Doubt it Kane makes half what he does and PL seems to have fallen off quite quicklyKane for laine
He's a completely one-dimensional player, who is streaky in that one dimension. I'm not sold but in your scenario, sure.. if he's willing to do that. Seems like a pretty stubborn individual though.I wouldn't hate a retained Skinner, but would much rather they bought him out and have oilers sign him for pennies.
No problem!Only guys that immediately come to mind out east are Skinner (who apparently won't waive, hence the potential buyout by BUF) and Marner. But the latter is completely out of the question. Can't be a D without moving out a problematic $9 million player first, so... ?? Still a bit confused. Kakko is a low price point so not him either. I guess trading one price point problem for another one. Still interesting, thanks for posting about it ChaoticOrange!
That’s so interesting but Laine makes way too much. He is a special talent though, wish he could play to his full potential. I honestly thought he’d be the next great goal scorer when he was starting out.Kane for laine