Jarvi
Registered User
- Mar 22, 2012
- 773
- 652
This reads like someone who is too arrogant to admit mistakes. All snark, no substance.This reads like someone who follows the team just close enough to complain, but not close enough to actually know what's going on.
Skinner and Rico have some justification for lower production. Arvidsson is paid the most of those 3 though, and has been given the most opportunity, and with that opportunity he has accomplished very little. Holloway might not have produced as much here as on the blues, he also might have broken out and produced more. That's an unknown, I guess. But ask any GM in the league, except ours I suppose, and they would all take Holloway 10/10 over Arvidsson.
Even Skinner, why bring him in if they were going to try and reinvent his game through scratching him and playing him on the 4th line?
So please explain, what's this key information us tier 2 fans are missing that make those 2 great pickups, in place of the much younger and better producing Holloway?