CanadasTeam99
Registered User
- Jul 22, 2024
- 4,835
- 5,625
Again, good bet for the Oilers, a risk worth taking.
What does Skinners card say
Again, good bet for the Oilers, a risk worth taking.
Johnston can skate can forecheck, can cycle..AND...can play down in the dirt hockey. You trifle with one of his stars he is going to trifle with you.I get liking what Johnston is, he sucks at hockey.
He absolutely just a coke machine. His fancies are a disaster. If you're going to get a "big guy" from there you can get Leason, at least he can play hockey a bit too.Johnston can skate can forecheck, can cycle..AND...can play down in the dirt hockey. You trifle with one of his stars he is going to trifle with you.
He is not the proverbial coke machine.
Probably not as good.What does Skinners card say
Gibsons save percentage over the last 5.5 seasons, with team goals against and team goals against compared to league average:Fair question.
I personally do not look into the 5 year number behind that team. Anaheim was so atrocious, I can't look at it. If they were even middle of the pack, I would take the numbers more into consideration.
Health wise, that is up to our medical team to decide.
If you're going for a goalie from Anaheim, go for Dostal. The Red Wings are in a playoff spot so there's no reason for them to trade Talbot. I don't even know who the other two are.
Gibsons save percentage over the last 5.5 seasons, with team goals against and team goals against compared to league average:
19-20: .904 (Team GA: 225/71 games)*17 goals more allowed than league average goals against.
20-21: .903 (Team GA: 177/56 games) *15 goals more allowed than league average goals against.
21-22: .904 (Team GA: 266/82 games) *11 goals more allowed than league average goals against.
22-23: .899 (Team GA: 335/82 games) *77 goals more allowed than league average goals against
23-24: .888 (Team GA: 293/82 games) *40 goals more allowed than league average goals against.
24-25: .915 (Team GA: 163/54 games) *3 goals less allowed than league average goals against.
Normal font is when Eakins took over as coach, with Carlyle, he was a consistent .920+ goalie except Carlyle’s final year when it was .917. Eakins’ teams were also way over league average in goals against so it’s no surprise his save percentage took a big hit when Eakins took over. That guy has no clue how to coach defensive hockey, although he will boast about being the smartest hockey mind in the room.
Italicized font is with the new coach but they’re also a rebuilding hockey team. I think Gibson would be amazing behind this team.
I feel like this is tertiary to the other discussion, but I'll say I had the proper read or close to on nearly all of these and I think it speaks to forwards being a lot more predictable than goalies.We've had tons of whiffs on forwards in the McDavid era too, really the only forward we've signed or traded for after Chia's first year that's been a slam dunk has been Hyman.
Lucic bombed here, Strome bombed, Spooner bombed (lol), Athansiou was a waste of 2 2nds, Neal had to be bought out, Connor Brown was a big whiff at 4 million, Arvidsson is not having a good season, J. Skinner can barely get top 6 playing time. I wouldn't label Henrique a slam dunk either.
We have a terrible win/loss rate on forwards being brought in here too.
The Eakins factor should really not be discounted. We saw first hand how terrible he was at implementing a defensive system here and it should say something that he needed to take a job in the DEL after being fired from the Ducks. Usually once you get an NHL coaching job once you're set for life.
Honestly, if we do that, I’ll be happy as hellMy guesses are Ryan Donato and John Gibson + Brian Dumoulin as the adds. Maybe a 4C too if Philp isn’t ready yet. Really don’t have any high expectations for the deadline, but they do 100% need a goalie.
Well I new this was the case when they signed Klingberg and I guess I was going we'd use the assets on something else. (fingers crossed it's more than Donato)God, I hope not. I was a fan of signing Klingberg, but not to just give him a spot. He has looked okay, but if there isn't some improvement or someone comes onto the market that is a sure thing, it's stupid to call this defense set. I've liked his passing, but he has had some Bouch like fumbles, and outside of the Chicago game he is a minus player so far. I do think we need to give him some more time, but if a deal fell into our lap for Dobson, Pulock, or someone of that caliber, it's silly to turn it down at this point.
That doesn't even consider what would happen if one of our LHD went down. We have zero depth on that side after the main roster.
And rocking the room over a trade where we send out picks/prospects for an upgrade shouldn't be a concern. Colorado just traded one of their best players and look better for it. Vegas won a cup being the most ruthless franchise around. And we're sitting here worrying about Kasperi Kapanen, John Klingberg, or Calvin Pickard's feelings? Joke franchise if that's their mentality.
Completely false. Good goalies are consistently good and bad goalies are consistently bad. You may have outlier here and there- but they are what they are. Using the term “voodoo” is just to defend bad goaltending. They are no different than any other athlete in any sportWe aren't talking about players being drafted and the ability to predict how they will turn out in 5-10 years in the future based on watching them as a teenager, we are talking about goalies who have been around for roughly a decade or more and you self appointed goalie gurus still can't predict how they will perform from one season to the next.
Like.Gibsons save percentage over the last 5.5 seasons, with team goals against and team goals against compared to league average:
19-20: .904 (Team GA: 225/71 games)*17 goals more allowed than league average goals against.
20-21: .903 (Team GA: 177/56 games) *15 goals more allowed than league average goals against.
21-22: .904 (Team GA: 266/82 games) *11 goals more allowed than league average goals against.
22-23: .899 (Team GA: 335/82 games) *77 goals more allowed than league average goals against
23-24: .888 (Team GA: 293/82 games) *40 goals more allowed than league average goals against.
24-25: .915 (Team GA: 163/54 games) *3 goals less allowed than league average goals against.
Normal font is when Eakins took over as coach, with Carlyle, he was a consistent .920+ goalie except Carlyle’s final year when it was .917. Eakins’ teams were also way over league average in goals against so it’s no surprise his save percentage took a big hit when Eakins took over. That guy has no clue how to coach defensive hockey, although he will boast about being the smartest hockey mind in the room.
Italicized font is with the new coach but they’re also a rebuilding hockey team. I think Gibson would be amazing behind this team.
Well Jimmy maybe look 2-3 games back at the effect Ross had on his team against the Canadiens. They were down 2 goals in the first and playing listless hockey being dominated. After he fights Jack eye for a good reason his whole team changes for the next twenty five minutes or so. Anaheim wins the game 3-2.He absolutely just a coke machine. His fancies are a disaster. If you're going to get a "big guy" from there you can get Leason, at least he can play hockey a bit too.
Probably not as good.
I agree!If Gibson is an add, I wouldn't be surprised to see Dumoulin coming with him. Again I don't think those kinds of interviews have any value because a GM isn't going to tell anyone what they're looking for.
My guesses are Ryan Donato and John Gibson + Brian Dumoulin as the adds. Maybe a 4C too if Philp isn’t ready yet. Really don’t have any high expectations for the deadline, but they do 100% need a goalie.
But all the examples you gave of breakout goalies (plus a bonus one since he moved in-season) had positive arrows before it happened:
Hill- Save percentages of 0.918, 0.913, and 0.906 on some not great teams before Vegas traded for him
Stolarz- Was above 0.900 every team he played for (except for us lol) including a 0.925 last year
Thompson- 0.914, 0.915, 0.908 before arriving in Washington
Blackwood- 0.911 on a completely shit Sharks team this season prior being tradedl
In the end you would want both for insurance.The goal should be Gibson and Skinner not either or. They need to increase the floor of their goaltending with a very solid 1A/1B tandem. No way the Ducks take Skinner back in trade when they will build around their own development phase goaltender.
The issue is price point for significant Gibson retention over the next two years. That's likely why it's a game of chicken with Carolina and maybe Edmonton if they've even tire kicked. It's 1st round pick territory for retention.
NHLEdge Comps: NHL EDGE Puck and Player Tracking Statistics - Comparisons
2022-2023:
High Danger Saves:
.822% Gibson
.843% Skinner
Team Goal Differential:
-84 Ducks
+43 Oilers
2023-2024:
High Danger Saves:
.807% Gibson
.806% Skinner
Team Goal Differential:
-52 Ducks
+50 Oilers
2024-2025
High Danger Saves:
.811% Gibson
.808% Skinner
Team Goal Differential:
-8 Ducks
+11 Oilers
The play would be Gibson and Dumoulin which would shore up this team's back-end and with viable full retention on both worth throwing the 1st+ to move on the deal. Moving Pickard to Ducks or to Bako as a high quality system #3 would free up a $1 which might enable a stretch for a 3rd deadline forward piece from whatever is remaining as deadline day counts down.
The Gibson contract length also gives them some leverage against an inflationary hedge against Skinner's next contract.
I do not care that a coke machine ran around on the Habs, that's just not a thing that will really happen for playoff teams. He's not good enough at hockey to get icetime.Well Jimmy maybe look 2-3 games back at the effect Ross had on his team against the Canadiens.
Gibsons save percentage over the last 5.5 seasons, with team goals against and team goals against compared to league average:
19-20: .904 (Team GA: 225/71 games)*17 goals more allowed than league average goals against.
20-21: .903 (Team GA: 177/56 games) *15 goals more allowed than league average goals against.
21-22: .904 (Team GA: 266/82 games) *11 goals more allowed than league average goals against.
22-23: .899 (Team GA: 335/82 games) *77 goals more allowed than league average goals against
23-24: .888 (Team GA: 293/82 games) *40 goals more allowed than league average goals against.
24-25: .915 (Team GA: 163/54 games) *3 goals less allowed than league average goals against.
Normal font is when Eakins took over as coach, with Carlyle, he was a consistent .920+ goalie except Carlyle’s final year when it was .917. Eakins’ teams were also way over league average in goals against so it’s no surprise his save percentage took a big hit when Eakins took over. That guy has no clue how to coach defensive hockey, although he will boast about being the smartest hockey mind in the room.
Italicized font is with the new coach but they’re also a rebuilding hockey team. I think Gibson would be amazing behind this team.