Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | With Klingberg in the Mix Who Are Our 7D After the Deadline?

That was also a team that had to cut their bench down to basically 5 forwards and 3 D men in OT because the rest of the roster was so clinically inept that it was less risky to triple shift a select few players than it was to play the others at all.
I f***ing hate Dave Tippett. How do you get outcoached by Jeremy Colliton?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Faelko
That was how many years ago? The Avalanche beat him to the tune of a 5GAA. Hell even the mighty Canadiens had no trouble beating him that year. We beat arguably the best goalie in the west last year.

Besides, we wouldn't have to worry about the Jets until round 3. And they'll likely be gone by then.

The fact is we got a good three rounds last year with fairly mediocre opposition goaltending (Talbot is decent but McDavid/Drai know him inside out and have beaten him 2 billion times in practice so there is no mental edge he can possibly ever have).

I don't think it's a given that will repeat again this year, you probably are eventually going to have to play a team where the goalie is A) good and B) on their game for that round.

Who here has confidence that Stuart Skinner is up for that? Not me.
 
The fact is we got a good three rounds last year with fairly mediocre opposition goaltending (Talbot is decent but McDavid/Drai know him inside out and have beaten him 2 billion times in practice so there is no mental edge he can possibly ever have).

I don't think it's a given that will repeat again this year, you probably are eventually going to have to play a team where the goalie is A) good and B) on their game for that round.

Who here has confidence that Stuart Skinner is up for that? Not me.
I'd wager your opinion that Oettinger is a mediocre goalie wouldn't be well received.
 
I'd wager your opinion that Oettinger is a mediocre goalie wouldn't be well received.

Probably depends on which way the wind is blowing.

Lose a game to the Stars where Oettinger played well? It's the end of the world because we don't have a goalie like that and won't ever win anything without a goalie like that.

Skinner beats Oettinger in a game or playoff series? Oettinger is overrated, and not that great anyways.
 
Probably depends on which way the wind is blowing.

Lose a game to the Stars where Oettinger played well? It's the end of the world because we don't have a goalie like that and won't ever win anything without a goalie like that.

Skinner beats Oettinger in a game or playoff series? Oettinger is overrated, and not that great anyways.
It's funny how the narrative shifted so fast that Dallas wasn't really all that great of a team even though they were probably the best team in the West. Apparently the Oilers should sweep every single team they play. They're just that good.
 
I'd wager your opinion that Oettinger is a mediocre goalie wouldn't be well received.

I don't think it's a given he's a great goalie. Yet. Might get there, but even last season he was what? .905 in the regular season? That's fairly mediocre and a massive drop from his season prior, it's not that shocking that we were able to get to him.

He's not like a Bobrovsky yet where he has multiple past good seasons and especially good playoffs to lean on (he had a great series against ... Calgary ... lol ... whoopity doo) where you have to be afraid of them even if they are playing bad in a stretch.
 
I don't think it's a given he's a great goalie. Yet. Might get there, but even last season he was what? .905 in the regular season? That's fairly mediocre, it's not that shocking that we were able to get to him.

He's not like a Bobrovsky yet where he has multiple past good seasons and especially good playoffs to lean on (he had a great series against ... Calgary ... lol ... whoopity doo).
.912 and 2.30 GAA this year. Wow what an utterly mediocre goalie. Meanwhile you prop up John Gibson like he's Patrick Roy.
1738175020603.png
 
It's funny how the narrative shifted so fast that Dallas wasn't really all that great of a team even though they were probably the best team in the West. Apparently the Oilers should sweep every single team they play. They're just that good.
I'm not sure Oilers beat Dallas if Dallas didn't have to play Vegas and Colorado
 
.912 and 2.30 GAA this year. Wow what an utterly mediocre goalie. Meanwhile you prop up John Gibson like he's Patrick Roy. View attachment 969096

Yeah and maybe he gets there as a top goalie eventually, I'm saying as of last year it's not like he was a bonafied superstar goalie.

.905 last year was a massive drop off for him, if he goes on to become a top goalie then maybe we were fortunate we got him in a down season.

The fact is though do you really think we're going to get another 4 playoff rounds in a row with the level of goaltending we faced last playoffs? Probably not. Eventually you are going to run into someone good who is actually on their game by simple probability. You have to be prepared for that.
 
Hopefully some will apply this same train of thought to one John Gibson.
Not really the same at all. Blackwood has had similar results with multiple coaches. Gibson has had decent to good numbers with every coach except Dallas Eakins. I wouldn’t be surprised to see him rebound. If any fanbase should account for an Eakins affect it should be us.
 
It's funny how the narrative shifted so fast that Dallas wasn't really all that great of a team even though they were probably the best team in the West. Apparently the Oilers should sweep every single team they play. They're just that good.

The narrative around the Stars is the most confusing in the league.

"Deepest team!!!"

They're old, have zero elite offensive talent, and are only 3 D-men deep. They have a bunch of good forwards, but they're sprinkled around anywhere and none of them outside of maaaaybe Johnston are going to scare anyone with any consistency.
 
That doesn't speak well for his overall attitude if he's a quitter. And I've certainly read a few Ducks posters suggest exactly that. You're paid to play regardless of how bad the team is.

Go find me a goalie with incredible stats on a team that's been tanking for 5+ seasons. I don't think you could find one in NHL history period.

Carey Price had mediocre seasons with the Habs statistically when they were bad, but given a window to go to the Cup even on his last legs, he was able to elevate his game in a hurry and take them to a Cup Final beating teams like Vegas in the playoffs which is absurd. That Habs team had no business winning that round.
 
The narrative around the Stars is the most confusing in the league.

"Deepest team!!!"

They're old, have zero elite offensive talent, and are only 3 D-men deep. They have a bunch of good forwards, but they're sprinkled around anywhere and none of them outside of maaaaybe Johnston are going to scare anyone with any consistency.

The narrative on them also flipped completely the second they lost to Edmonton.

Straight up went from 'elite everywhere' to 'good depth but elite nowhere' in a matter of minutes.
 
It's funny how the narrative shifted so fast that Dallas wasn't really all that great of a team even though they were probably the best team in the West. Apparently the Oilers should sweep every single team they play. They're just that good.
I remember the narrative even amongst friends in real life not the hyperbole of the online world was that whoever won the stars/avs series were going to absolutely crush us. When the sta red won it was because of their goaltending and depth. Now all of a sudden the goaltending wasn’t that good and they weren’t really that deep lol.
 
Dallas had the tougher first two matchups in Vegas and Colorado. The Oilers toughest opponent in the first two rounds was Stuart Skinner
Tougher in what sense though? If it’s not taking a toll physically what does that even mean or how is it relevant? I would say we were more physically worn down through the first two rounds than they were.
 
I remember the narrative even amongst friends in real life not the hyperbole of the online world was that whoever won the stars/avs series were going to absolutely crush us. When the sta red won it was because of their goaltending and depth. Now all of a sudden the goaltending wasn’t that good and they weren’t really that deep lol.
Apparently every team in the West except the Oilers is dogshit. Amazing pretzeling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MessierII
Tougher in what sense though? If it’s not taking a toll physically what does that even mean or how is it relevant? I would say we were more physically worn down through the first two rounds than they were.
Tougher in the sense that that Colorado and Vegas are straight better than LA and Vancouver. If you play weaker teams, you're going to come out fresher than playing a tougher teams.
 
I remember the narrative even amongst friends in real life not the hyperbole of the online world was that whoever won the stars/avs series were going to absolutely crush us. When the sta red won it was because of their goaltending and depth. Now all of a sudden the goaltending wasn’t that good and they weren’t really that deep lol.

Other than the Kings series which was never really in much doubt, the Stars one was by far our easiest IMO. At no point did they really scare me, the Oilers losses in that series were mostly due to self inflicted wounds in Games 2 and 3. I felt comfortable we would beat them the whole way.

That team isn't physical whatsoever, there is no gamesmanship whatsoever, they have no depth on defence to concern you. They're just kind of "there" in all areas.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad