Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | Vegas Claim & Somehow Assign Lavoie to Farm... because Oilers.

Status
Not open for further replies.

North

Registered User
Jun 25, 2009
16,150
14,266
I don't think him refusing to play on his off side was the issue. He play there in the minors also.
Maybe a taste of playing with Nurse in the playoffs was enough to tell him that wasn’t the way forward with regards to his own future.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ninety7

Ritchie Valens

Registered User
Sep 24, 2007
29,885
43,091
Well, he nearly backstopped them to one last season so not sure how you can say that with such certainty.
This is a guy who went toe to toe with Oettinger and Bobrovsky and it's not like the Oilers had a 70s Canadiens defense sheltering him. This seems to be forgotten because of 1 regular season game.

The reality is that I don't see how you can find a clearly better goalie than Skinner and what do you do? Trade Skinner in the package too because any high level starter is going to come with a big price tag.

The realistic path to improving the team is the defense. Skinner is good enough to win them a Cup, as evidenced by last season.
I disagree, they got within one win in spite of Skinner, not because of him. He was pulled in the Van series and Pickard saved their asses in game 6. Thankfully he found his game in game 7. Their speed overmatched Dallas but he did play better. In the finals, in game 3 they were up then Florida pumped 3 goals by him in 10 minutes. Again, they were fortunate enough to drag it to 7 games after being down 3-0.

There’s a large enough sample size on him to show he’s wildly inconsistent and it’s hard to win with inconsistent goaltending. It’s no secret the defense and goaltending are the issues. With not much cap space Bowman will have some tinkering to do but I’d be more inclined to try and fix the goaltending than the D because good goaltending can bail out a mediocre defense but inconsistent goaltending won’t.
 

bellagiobob

Registered User
Jul 27, 2006
24,587
61,122
Last edited:

sepHF

Patreeky
Feb 12, 2010
16,263
4,924
Edmonton
now Vegas gets to automatically send Lavoie to the AHL and he doesnt have to clear

I cant grasp why this rule is a thing. I guess so players dont get stuck in an infinite claim loop?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 Mins 4 Ftg

North

Registered User
Jun 25, 2009
16,150
14,266
Ultimately it’s that a hole other team that claimed Lavoie so we couldn’t send him down without waivers and then decided not claim him now. It must have been Vancouver.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CycloneSweep

CycloneSweep

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
51,129
42,761
All because we have awful defence and we need every single penny of deadline space. What a mess we are in.
 

MoontoScott

Registered User
Jun 2, 2012
9,101
11,268
That’s been my theory, that Vegas did a small futures side deal with another team to make a bogus initial claim.


Theory confirmed.
This saga has been more entertaining than that Winnipeg game by a country mile.

Good for Lavoie. He gets a fresh start with a different team. When your old team has waived you 3 times in the past 2 seasons then its safe to say that they didn't have much faith in you.

Well, I guess the "13th forward" selection is down to either Philp (out of hockey for a year) or Lavoie (completely unproven at the pro level).

Is there someone else I am missing?
 

North

Registered User
Jun 25, 2009
16,150
14,266
Really don't understand why they felt the need to waive him again. It was entirely obvious that Vegas would claim him again, did they want to do McRimjob a favour?
Ultimately it’s the cap space. Also if they are considering signing one of Shattenkirk, Jultz, or Giordano, they’ll need it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad