Soundwave
Registered User
- Mar 1, 2007
- 74,382
- 30,593
I know our shot counts were pathetic that game 6, but he stole it? That means he made at least multiple saves he should have no business making. Or was he doing what he was supposed to do.Lmao. This is absolute nonsense and you know it. He bested one of the best goalies in the league and kept a high powered Dallas team at bay, including absolutely stealing the series winning game. And people still shit on him for it. This is straight up Canucks-level delusion.
If Skinner doesn't let in that goal then the Oilers don't lose the Stanley Cup on the back of a muffin that Skinner regularly lets in.
Why would the Panthers take offensive risks in a tied game? You don't do that unless you're losing.It's a lot easier to score #2 when it's 1-1 and the other team is taking offensive risks then when it's 2-1 and the other team has parked the bus.
Dustin Schwartz, I keep telling you.So just sit around then and protect skinner at all costs. Do nothing?
Might as well fold the season then.
Okay? The Oilers played one more game than the Panthers did leading up to the Cup Finals. I don't care about "Almosts". Almost doesn't count for anything. The Panthers almost pulled off the biggest choke in professional sports. Doubt they care now.Have you not watch the Vancouver series? The Oilers breezed thru LA in 5 games with Stuart trying to tank the series. Skinner did an even worse job against Vancouver. We almost got eliminated by them when it was a nothing series and Stuart turn it into something else
They would've to either waaaayyyy. What part of this is so hard to understaaaanddddddYes, and they could have grinded out a second goal, like you might expect they would have needed to do in game 7 of the final. Just like you would have expected Florida to have to grind out their game-winning goal. But Florida didn't have to, of course.
Lmao. So when the Oilers win Skinner had nothing to do with it and when they lose it's only his fault. Got it. No wonder the fanbase has the reputation it does.Just shows you how good of a team the Oilers were. They gave nothing to Dallas and made Stuart look great. Imagine the Oilers last season with a competent goalie
I know our shot counts were pathetic that game 6, but he stole it? That means he made at least multiple saves he should have no business making. Or was he doing what he was supposed to do.
Lmao. This is absolute nonsense and you know it. He bested one of the best goalies in the league and kept a high powered Dallas team at bay, including absolutely stealing the series winning game. And people still shit on him for it. This is straight up Canucks-level delusion.
You don’t get to take credit for that. People have said skinner sucks since his first game against Ottawa when he nearly blew an 6 goal lead. There’s nothing wrong with waiting for someone to develop a little before jettisoning them off to Mordor. Don’t forgot that until last year skinner wasn’t the starting goalie. They signed Campbell and before Campbell they tried to find other goalies and even offered markstrom a contract.Fair.
Although I think I've converted a lot of the board at this point...
At this point last year it was pretty much just me and @Drivesaitl saying Skinner wasn't it.
This is the dumbest thing I've seen on here since the Oilers-Canucks series. The self-satisfied foolishness of the weird extended spelling is even more annoying.They would've to either waaaayyyy. What part of this is so hard to understaaaandddddd
Lmao. So when the Oilers win Skinner had nothing to do with it and when they lose it's only his fault. Got it. No wonder the fanbase has the reputation it does.
Goals let in by Skinner in the Dallas series: 2 (2OT), 2, 4 (aka the one bad game), 2, 1, 1.He played one terrific game against Dallas. ONE.
It takes FOUR wins to advance.
He was mediocre in the other games. All I've been asking for is MEDIOCRE goaltending. Mediocre is good enough for this team to be elite!
You know what IS delusional? You acting like Skinner has been anything f***ing TERRIBLE this season.
Sure he played a small role. The Oilers insulated him and isn't given enough credit. If anything, the Oilers forwards and defense put on a clinic.They would've to either waaaayyyy. What part of this is so hard to understaaaandddddd
Lmao. So when the Oilers win Skinner had nothing to do with it and when they lose it's only his fault. Got it. No wonder the fanbase has the reputation it does.
Because you're not getting it. They needed to score twice. They scored once. Skinner would've had to completely shut out the Panthers to win the game.This is the dumbest thing I've seen on here since the Oilers-Canucks series. The self-satisfied foolishness of the weird extended spelling is even more annoying.
You're not getting it. The fact that the Oilers were grinding out a 1-1 game in game 7 of the stanley cup finals does not somehow justify the absolute stinker Skinner let in to lose the game. Your position is absurd.Because you're not getting it. They needed to score twice. They scored once. Skinner would've had to completely shut out the Panthers to win the game.
Does no one remember how beat up, cobbled and injured they were?Well because Florida was basically able to shut down and play a trap for the last half of the game because they got a freebie muffin goal.
Skinner should've shut out the Panthers in Game 7 of their barn. He also should've scored a couple goals. I read you loud and clear.You're not getting it. The fact that the Oilers were grinding out a 1-1 game in game 7 of the stanley cup finals does not somehow justify the absolute stinker Skinner let in to lose the game. Your position is absurd.
Someone here will say it's all on SchwartzPickard has a 2.44 GAA, that's good for 15th best in the league, he should honestly be getting more starts, the way this org plays favorites with certain players is ridiculous (ie: Desharnais getting more rope than Broberg and Kesselring not even given a chance).
Skinner has a 3.33 GAA which is significantly worse behind the same defense. That's 46th in the league.
This is honestly total bullshit.
Yes, you are as clever as you think.Skinner should've shut out the Panthers in Game 7 of their barn. He also should've scored a couple goals. I read you loud and clear.
So not very?Yes, you are as clever as you think.
It actually opens to another question. As they pivoted under Jackson to become a modern, information based decision making organization including investing in building up their support analytics function, why were they content to run back the two goalies instead of seeking an upgrade.You will get one response to this and in a few games its been true
"High danger chances are not all equal"
That is true, but when a team can keep them low mostly all year, you're goalie should be much better
So not very?
Anyway, tough to win when you don't score. That's not going to change regardless. You score only once and more often than not you'll lose.