McShogun99
Registered User
Bobrovsky put us in a 0-3 hole. His game one performance was practically legendary. We should have won that game 7-1.He single handedly put us in an 0-3 hole to start the SCF
Bobrovsky put us in a 0-3 hole. His game one performance was practically legendary. We should have won that game 7-1.He single handedly put us in an 0-3 hole to start the SCF
Well in Campbell's case his performance did carry over ... he carried his shit 2nd half of the season over straight into Edmonton, lol.
We don't need an elite goalie per se (if we had one we'd have Cup banners already), but we need someone better than bottom of the barrell though. We would have won the Cup in 2006 if Roloson didn't go down.
I think our chance to win a Cup with a Skinner-tier goalie was last year. The stars aligned for it to be nearly so.
I don't know if that's going to repeat. It was good fortune enough that it happened once. You need to get someone better than bottom 2 in the league for GSAA ... that's just not gonna work.
Skinner can't even blame the D for his terrible numbers this year, they've been playing much more structured this year and Pickard is allowing almost an entire goal less against per game, which is an enormous gap.
Otherwise every year is going to be this same soap opera, frankly I think everyone including the players are beyond tired of it.
This is what I was stating here in realtime during that game. Game 7SC finals are inordinantly low scoring and every goal hugely important. To me at the time felt like the 2-1 goal which was not even an HDSC was likely the cup winning goal. 2nd goals are often critical because its common for the losing club to only have 0,1, or 2 goals.Yeah so I looked it up, and in the modern era (lets define as that as the point Gretzky/Oilers entered the league in 1979), there have been nine game 7s in the Cup Finals.
9/9 times the team that gets to 2 goals first wins the Cup.
You. Cannot. Give. Up. The. 2nd. Goal. In. Game. 7. Of. A. Cup. Final.
You lose if you do. Defensive coaching schemes are too good these days. Teams will go into an auto-trap and play it balls to the wall for 30-40 minutes (whatever is left in the game to kill off).
Wasn't there a game where he came in just for the shootout?ahh I remember Garon. What was it? 11 shootout victories in a row? lol
This is what I was stating here in realtime during that game. Game 7SC finals are inordinantly low scoring and every goal hugely important. To me at the time felt like the 2-1 goal which was not even an HDSC was likely the cup winning goal. 2nd goals are often critical because its common for the losing club to only have 0,1, or 2 goals.
Lolol i know we pulled i believe Mike Morrison to replace him for the shootout lololWasn't there a game where he came in just for the shootout?
I think it was Conklin who played a pretty solid game and took the team to the shootout, and MacTavish pulled him for the shootout and put in Morrison (or Markinen?), and Conklin took his helmet off and slammed it on the bench.Lolol i know we pulled i believe Mike Morrison to replace him for the shootout lolol
I remember a game where Conklin finished the 3rd and Morrison came in for a shootout and Conkin chucked his helmet down.Lolol i know we pulled i believe Mike Morrison to replace him for the shootout lolol
He’s the worst goalie in the league has been for a few years now, he can’t move, can’t react, can’t play goalie.I like how SV% is sometimes an acceptable argument for tearing down goalies, but other times it isn't an acceptable argument for propping them up.
Keep on keepin on boys.
How's your boy Campbell doing?He’s the worst goalie in the league has been for a few years now, he can’t move, can’t react, can’t play goalie.
He will have played more NHL games then not my fault skinner in the endHow's your boy Campbell doing?
Don't worry it's a rhetorical question.
it’s sv% combined with a plethora of other stats that says he’s shit.I like how SV% is sometimes an acceptable argument for tearing down goalies, but other times it isn't an acceptable argument for propping them up.
Keep on keepin on boys. Teams gonna do what they do every single year and if you don't know that by now you should probably pay attention or take up a real sport, like knitting. Knit yourself a f***in somebody
I would like that as well but I think if we do a goalie change his cap needs to go.I’d keep Skinner around as a back up. He just isn’t #1 material. You can tell on the faces of the guys when he lets in a bad goal. It’s back breaking.
Its stunning to me that anyone who has watched this team and actually understands why Skinner forced into being a #1 well before he was ready can defend Campbell.How's your boy Campbell doing?
Don't worry it's a rhetorical question.
They both suck.Its stunning to me that anyone who has watched this team and actually understands why Skinner forced into being a #1 well before he was ready can defend Campbell.
Easier to just ignore all of that and continue to shit all over Skinner I guess.
Campbell set this team back in a major way...on multiple levels
Clearly the most deestructive decision Holland made with this team. Now he is relaxing in the sun spending his $25M.
Nice parting gift from Old Dutch.
It's not even just goalies. Every season it's the same thing.Its stunning to me that anyone who has watched this team and actually understands why Skinner forced into being a #1 well before he was ready can defend Campbell.
Easier to just ignore all of that and continue to shit all over Skinner I guess.
Campbell set this team back in a major way...on multiple levels
Clearly the most deestructive decision Holland made with this team. Now he is relaxing in the sun spending his $25M.
Nice parting gift from Old Dutch.
For different reasons.They both suck.
Who's our zamboni driver?