Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | Does Bowman Make His Mark on the Team Before Training Camp?

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
73,204
29,149
I was talking about trading Kulak specifically. Us losing the upside of these younger, cost efficient players is going to have a negative impact on this team's ability to eventually replace its aging vets.

This team is going to have to find a way to add guys in their mid 20s who fit some of these longer term needs.

Gonna have to take flyers on players like Boqvist, Valimaki, Kostin, Podkolzine ... players like that when they pop up on the market for peanuts.

Our own internal drafting at this point likely isn't going to yield much for the forseeable window, our next 1st is 2026, that player probably won't be ready to significantly contribute until 2029 at the earliest, that pick is probably a goner at this year's deadline anyway.

Can't rely on drafting anymore, the Oilers had a window to do that in (2015-2023) and they largely blew it, even if they hit pay dirt on a fluke pick in the 3rd/4th round at this point, again you're probably waiting until 2029 or 2030 for such a player to really be a big contributor most likely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duke74

BarDownBobo

Registered User
Oct 19, 2012
6,518
3,298
City of Champions
I like the idea of us farming for a young mainstay to recoup the loss of Broberg. Giving a real opportunity can trigger accelerated development like when Bouchard got promoted and got to play with Ekholm

The issue is that last season proved to us that having any handicap to short term success is a bad idea. In particular seeing that Nurse-Lindstrom pairing stands out. Having said that, Nurse seemed better with Broberg than Ceci. It's a small sample but maybe shows that Nurse responds to a skillset moreso than a steady veteran who isn't a great skater.
I agree with this, but I’d personally take it even a step further. At least to start the year I’d like to see them split the Ekholm-Bouchard pairing up. Pair Nurse with Bouchard, see if that can ignite his game while also testing to see if Bouchard can pull the weight and carry a pairing himself. If he’s unable to do that we want to know now before they decide to lock him into a huge money contract. Bring in a younger, possibly high upside guy to pair with Ekholm and see if he can work his magic again. Lindstrom is definitely an intriguing option here and one that would be completely free, the other guy I’d look at is Soderstrom out of Utah who seems like he’s been passed over with the moves they’ve made this summer. Then for the third pairing you ideally want to run with Kulak-Emberson, but you’ve also got Stecher and his almost 500 games of experience as a backup option. To me that defense is good enough to get them to the deadline where you can see who’s developed and what you might need to look for in a trade.
 

SupremeTeam16

5-14-6-1
May 31, 2013
8,760
8,582
Baker’s Bay
If Derek Ryan is our opening day 4C that would be a fail in my eyes.
Ryan is fine, likely he’ll be splitting time with Hamblin or I’d love to see Philp pick up where he left off even if it’s later in the year. The other thing is we are so deep we can afford to cycle Mcdavid and Drai out on the 4th line a few times a game like they’ve done a lot in the past.

they can always bring someone else on as well.
 

CanadasTeam99

Registered User
Jul 22, 2024
160
188
I don't give a rats ass about broberg and he could flounder next year, but what is this I read about him playing the last 2 reg season games against shit teams and that is what made him OS eligible?

Which turd in the Oilers org has the job of watching for that?

I know Kenny probably drank some Nyquil the whole 5 years. Did he have some nepo hire who should have known this?

Which dumtard didn't know this?
 

AddyTheWrath

Registered User
Mar 24, 2015
11,426
20,118
Toronto
I don't give a rats ass about broberg and he could flounder next year, but what is this I read about him playing the last 2 reg season games against shit teams and that is what made him OS eligible?

Which turd in the Oilers org has the job of watching for that?

I know Kenny probably drank some Nyquil the whole 5 years. Did he have some nepo hire who should have known this?

Which dumtard didn't know this?
That ended up being false
 

Spawn

Something in the water
Feb 20, 2006
44,254
16,646
Edmonton
With Emberson and Stetcher I don’t really see the point of signing any of these fringe guys anymore. Schultz, Barrie, Lindstrom etc. We don’t need more maybes. If we're adding a RHD it needs to be someone that is legitimate top 4 guy. Otherwise it just feels like a bit of a waste of time.

Barrie might be fine in a 3rd pairing role but is he much of an upgrade on our other RHD not named Bouchard? Justin Schultz is the guy that I'd want to bring back on D if anyone.
And Justin Schultz is better? He had a miserable season as Seattles 6/7 dman and is 34 years old.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dazed and Confused

Fourier

Registered User
Dec 29, 2006
26,463
21,739
Waterloo Ontario
Gonna have to take flyers on players like Boqvist, Valimaki, Kostin, Podkolzine ... players like that when they pop up on the market for peanuts.

Our own internal drafting at this point likely isn't going to yield much for the forseeable window, our next 1st is 2026, that player probably won't be ready to significantly contribute until 2029 at the earliest, that pick is probably a goner at this year's deadline anyway.

Can't rely on drafting anymore, the Oilers had a window to do that in (2015-2023) and they largely blew it, even if they hit pay dirt on a fluke pick in the 3rd/4th round at this point, again you're probably waiting until 2029 or 2030 for such a player to really be a big contributor most likely.
And I will add, scour the undrafted market from the CHL, NCAA and in Europe.
 

Fourier

Registered User
Dec 29, 2006
26,463
21,739
Waterloo Ontario
I like our goalie depth but Vinni is like 5 years away. Ungar is like 3-4 years ago and may never turn out. Rodrigue could be ready as soon as next year. Askarov would be ready next year but he could also be the best of the bunch. For a 2nd it could be worthwhile. That's what we used on Vinni. But I wouldn't send a 1st for Askarov tho.
If Nashville would accept a 2nd for Askarov he'd be gone already. I just don't see them at that place right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bryanbryoil

ottawah

Registered User
Jan 7, 2011
3,621
717
Anyone else not want Barrie? I'd rather give that Lindstrom guy a shot. He seems like he has potential, just have Nurse do the puck moving.
Perhaps but only as third pairing and whatever offensive minutes are left after bouchard (10-12 a game). He cannot play in situations which are defensive in nature unless you are tanking for #1.
 

Fourier

Registered User
Dec 29, 2006
26,463
21,739
Waterloo Ontario
Or trade Kulak last summer and give Broberg the runway to earn a healthy raise on his natural side. He was upset that the organization never showed that he was in their immediate plans. You can't really argue that. He wasn't going to be a top four defenseman here for a long while.

This is just proof that overcooking your prospects can also have a bad outcome. This is an organization that was heavily criticized for rushing its prospects for many years.
If there was a way to avoid losing Broberg it was probably dealing Kulak last year. But at the time that would have been a very risky move. Kulak was a solid third pair vet who seemed to stabilize things for Vinny. Imagine the blowback after the start they had last year if a pair of rookies were getting decimated with no internal replacement.

I actually agree with your last statement. It's a balancing act but you need to know what you have before you are forced to go one way or another. The next in line here is Lavoie. Certainly a less important prospect but a guy who I think could be a terrific internal add if he ever reached his full potential. The Oilers can now afford to see what they have in him. If they waive him, I think someone will take a shot.
 

Took a pill in Sbisa

2showToffoliIwascool
Apr 23, 2004
16,564
7,515
Australia
With Emberson and Stetcher I don’t really see the point of signing any of these fringe guys anymore. Schultz, Barrie, Lindstrom etc. We don’t need more maybes. If we're adding a RHD it needs to be someone that is legitimate top 4 guy. Otherwise it just feels like a bit of a waste of time.


And Justin Schultz is better? He had a miserable season as Seattles 6/7 dman and is 34 years old.

Kind of impressive that he had a miserable season and still manage to outscore over half our dmen despite being on a team that scored 80 less goals.
 

Mcnotloilersfan

I'm here, I'm bored
Jul 11, 2010
11,271
5,472
Niagara
With Emberson and Stetcher I don’t really see the point of signing any of these fringe guys anymore. Schultz, Barrie, Lindstrom etc. We don’t need more maybes. If we're adding a RHD it needs to be someone that is legitimate top 4 guy. Otherwise it just feels like a bit of a waste of time.


And Justin Schultz is better? He had a miserable season as Seattles 6/7 dman and is 34 years old.
Keep in mind by the deadline we will have someone much better on the 2nd pair. I'm all for a PTO, especially if Stetcher comes into camp too slow after his injury.

Barrie or Schultz could be an okay placeholder until the deadline, and also offer an option on the PP if Bouch gets injured.
 

GhostfaceWu

Shi Shaw
Feb 11, 2015
11,058
11,382
Couldn’t disagree with this more. Ekholm and Bouchard might be the best pairing in the league. Definitely up there.
Do you really wanna pay bouchard based off play with a player that'll be gone most likely when that contract is in it's infancy? If he flails paired with nurse at least that gives the oilers a little bit of leverage.
 

Dazed and Confused

Ludicrous speed, GO!
Aug 10, 2007
6,326
2,863
Berlin, Germany
I agree with this, but I’d personally take it even a step further. At least to start the year I’d like to see them split the Ekholm-Bouchard pairing up. Pair Nurse with Bouchard, see if that can ignite his game while also testing to see if Bouchard can pull the weight and carry a pairing himself. If he’s unable to do that we want to know now before they decide to lock him into a huge money contract. Bring in a younger, possibly high upside guy to pair with Ekholm and see if he can work his magic again. Lindstrom is definitely an intriguing option here and one that would be completely free, the other guy I’d look at is Soderstrom out of Utah who seems like he’s been passed over with the moves they’ve made this summer. Then for the third pairing you ideally want to run with Kulak-Emberson, but you’ve also got Stecher and his almost 500 games of experience as a backup option. To me that defense is good enough to get them to the deadline where you can see who’s developed and what you might need to look for in a trade.

I don't hate breaking up Ekholm and Bouchard (though I'm hardly a fan of the idea), but I don't like the idea of Bouchard (or even Ekholm) with Nurse. Imo the big thing Nurse needs next to him is speed. As weird as it sounds, I think you'd get more mileage out of Nurse-Kulak than you would out of Nurse-Bouchard/Ekholm.


Still we've seen Kulak-Bouchard play well together, Ekholm and Emberson could also be a quality shutdown pairing, and that would leave Nurse with Stecher which is a combo I like too.

Ekholm-Emberson
Kulak-Bouchard
Nurse-Stecher

No real top pair, but no clear third one either. I think it's an idea that at least merits a preseason game or two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InTheBox

Fourier

Registered User
Dec 29, 2006
26,463
21,739
Waterloo Ontario
The trade request just came out and they're exploring options. Maybe a 2nd and a sweetener
Askarov would be a great add but I think that Nashville will want an actual warm body if they move him. Probably a young prospect with similar upside. That second from the Oilers would at best be around a 45th or so pick assuming it was St. Louis' pick (the Oilers don't have their 2nd). Even though goalies don't get a lot in return he is still a guy many would see as a top end goalie prospect. A mid second is not much of a return at this point. Of course things may change. Askarov may force their hand and the return may be less than expected. I just don't see that being the case right now.
 

alphahelix

Registered User
Feb 15, 2007
7,226
3,059
The oilers defence is in a desperate situation and that’s perfectly healthy with all hands on deck.

Oilers need a big trade now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McTonyBrar
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad