Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | Does Bowman Make His Mark on the Team Before Training Camp?

Status
Not open for further replies.

CantHaveTkachev

Cap Space > NHL players
Nov 30, 2004
52,170
34,200
St. OILbert, AB
RNH-McD-Hyman
Skinner-Drai-RV
Pacioretty ($1M 1yr)-Henrique-Savoie
Janmark-Ryan-C. Brown

Ek-Bouch
Nurse-Ceci
Kulak-Barrie ($1M 1 yr)

Skins
Pickard

Use STL 2nd + 3rd + prospects to upgrade on Ceci. We will have a ton of cap with Kane on LTIR all year, so that should make up for a lack of primo assets. It hurts, yes, but not as much as letting our cap structure get f***ed by two kids looking for a premature payday.
Woof, that defense is bad..especially with Ceci getting worse every year
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDoused

Spawn

Something in the water
Feb 20, 2006
44,436
16,969
Edmonton
sign them both and deal with it after, if you can dump ceci and ltir kane awesome, if you have to trade kane then you do it, hes declining and holloway is going to fill the hyman gap in the coming years when 18 starts to decline

The cost to dump Ceci goes way up once you match both those deals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jeg and Oilhawks

belair

Win it for Ben!
Apr 9, 2010
39,580
23,270
Canada
Think about this man. We have enough wingers that can replace Holloway. Who else do we have after Ekholm, Bouchard and Nurse other than Broberg?

Ceci is not top 4. Kulak is not either. Wanner is not ready. Neither is Akey
At $4.5m? There'd be a good selection of guys in next year's FA that are probably well ahead of where Broberg would be. Him with that cap hit and the immediate expense to the current roster isn't as valuable to the Oilers as you're suggesting he is.

And the fact if the matter is that Broberg isn't established as a top four defenseman either. We've seen him take steps backwards in training camp in consecutive seasons.

That offersheet is a Kotkaniemi-level risk on STL's part. And the only reason it makes sense is because Torey Krug's career is in question. The Oilers have Nurse and Ekholm ahead of him for the foreseeable future. Odds are they weren't earmarking him for RD permanently either.

This is a payroll built with the primary focus being a Championship. Hard to see them changing the focus to give an unestablished player 400% of what the Oilers anticipated they'd be paying him.
 

SupremeTeam16

5-14-6-1
May 31, 2013
8,856
8,799
Baker’s Bay
Think about this man. We have enough wingers that can replace Holloway. Who else do we have after Ekholm, Bouchard and Nurse other than Broberg?

Ceci is not top 4. Kulak is not either. Wanner is not ready. Neither is Akey
In that sense you are correct but you’re overlooking that Broberg comes with a significant amount of more risk, in terms of his cap hit in the second year and his q/o after that. He plays the tougher position and now that he’s strong armed the team into a ludicrous cap hit given his performance thus far, he’s going to have to back it up right out of the gate. Not going to have the benefit of being sheltered anymore, he wanted to be paid as a second pairing and now he will be expected to perform like one, he’s put a ton of pressure on himself.

What do you think is going to happen if they match him and then he struggles to start the year playing 18-20 minutes a night? What do you think the questions he’s going to have to field from the media are going to be like. What do you think he’s going to hear from fans around town?

I think the risk he could crater under the pressure of living up to that contract is very real.
 

Paralyzer

Oilers Win Cup in 2025
Sep 29, 2006
15,984
8,426
Somewhere Up North

Not really in the mood to look at this, but if anybody cares. here are the pics.

Thanks. Appreciate it.

People saying Kane has an attitude and the players are not happy with him, explain to me why Kane is at Connors wedding? I see others too there. I really think people thinking Kane is an issue are just drumming up drama for no reason.
 

Tobias Kahun

Registered User
Oct 3, 2017
44,820
55,962
Thanks. Appreciate it.

People saying Kane has an attitude and the players are not happy with him, explain to me why Kane is at Connors wedding? I see others too there. I really think people thinking Kane is an issue are just drumming up drama for no reason.
People seem to think there’s issues because Kane would rather play than sit on LTIR
 

McTonyBrar

Registered User
Apr 2, 2018
19,475
21,192
In that sense you are correct but you’re overlooking that Broberg comes with a significant amount of more risk, in terms of his cap hit in the second year and his q/o after that. He plays the tougher position and now that he’s strong armed the team into a ludicrous cap hit given his performance thus far, he’s going to have to back it up right out of the gate. Not going to have the benefit of being sheltered anymore, he wanted to be paid as a second pairing and now he will be expected to perform like one, he’s put a ton of pressure on himself.

What do you think is going to happen if they match him and then he struggles to start the year playing 18-20 minutes a night? What do you think the questions he’s going to have to field from the media are going to be like. What do you think he’s going to hear from fans around town?

I think the risk he could crater under the pressure of living up to that contract is very real.
Tough move I know but what do you think will happen if he doesn't struggle and flourishes? Him playing good and at home right away in the playoffs was no accident.

At $4.5m? There'd be a good selection of guys in next year's FA that are probably well ahead of where Broberg would be. Him with that cap hit and the immediate expense to the current roster isn't as valuable to the Oilers as you're suggesting he is.

And the fact if the matter is that Broberg isn't established as a top four defenseman either. We've seen him take steps backwards in training camp in consecutive seasons.

That offersheet is a Kotkaniemi-level risk on STL's part. And the only reason it makes sense is because Torey Krug's career is in question. The Oilers have Nurse and Ekholm ahead of him for the foreseeable future. Odds are they weren't earmarking him for RD permanently either.

This is a payroll built with the primary focus being a Championship. Hard to see them changing the focus to give an unestablished player 400% of what the Oilers anticipated they'd be paying him.
Yeah but we aren't talking about next year. We need our top 4 set this year. Losing Broberg will just take us back to finding a top 4 Dman again. This offersheet is not as bad as Kotkaniemi. That was over 6 million
 

VeteranPresence

Registered User
Aug 13, 2024
261
420
Woof, that defense is bad..especially with Ceci getting worse every year

It's not awesome by any stretch, but I think Kulak-Barrie could be a sneaky good third pair given their respective puck moving abilities and mobility. We saw what Coffey did for this group, and maybe he can repeat some of that magic with Tyson during a second tour of duty.

What we absolutely need though is a Ceci upgrade, and this season/deadline is the best chance to find that player. Again, cap space is going to be tight for 99% of contenders. With Kane's LTIR + Ceci's money, we have lots of options and could stand to squeeze a club facing cap hurdles of their own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDoused

Arpeggio

Registered User
Jul 20, 2006
9,249
3,940
Edmonton
Honestly we can effectively roll the same D that got us to the final. Use the Broberg pick and 2026 1st + to upgrade Ceci at the deadline
I feel like this is the course of action that makes the most sense. Something will open up that gives them a better shot at winning this year than Broberg at 4.6. And they just got two goals away with Ceci. It's not the time to act desperately, take the assets and make a move down the road.
 

belair

Win it for Ben!
Apr 9, 2010
39,580
23,270
Canada
Yeah but we aren't talking about next year. We need our top 4 set this year. Losing Broberg will just take us back to finding a top 4 Dman again. This offersheet is not as bad as Kotkaniemi. That was over 6 million
We're talking about this year. Broberg at $4.5m means you have to remove healthy players off of the current roster. And to what? Give a rookie a contract you never intended on giving him.

You seem stuck on this idea that Broberg was earmarked for top four ice on this current Oilers roster. That was never going to happen. He may have been penciled as Nurse's partner. But at the end of the day he was likely averaging less than 15 minutes of ice a game. Less than Ceci and less than Kulak. He wasn't there yet.

At his cap hit, Broberg would be public enemy #1. There wouldn't be a supportive fanbase. There'd be a toxic, critical pushback to any sign of struggle that Broberg would have.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lay Z Boy GM

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
15,454
17,207
Ekholm - Bouchard
Nurse - Ceci
Kulak - Stecher
Brown

Will get us to the deadline no problem and that's not even mentioning that the only player on that list Broberg is definitively better than is the last one.

The bolded pair being the obvious problem area.

I wonder if in the big picture this would be a positive for Nurse though. "We aren't getting you a safety blanket this year, step up and carry your pair for once."

We saw what he does when he's challenged (Game 4 against the Stars), so it might be time to run him back again, except turning up the heat on him. He needs to be personally challenged to perform it seems.
 

McTonyBrar

Registered User
Apr 2, 2018
19,475
21,192
Stauffer confirms that, in January, Ken Holland was told to sign Broberg and Holloway to contracts very quickly.

Sounds like Holland fell asleep. WOW
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Bryanbryoil

Tarus

Registered User
Jun 22, 2006
9,601
4,888
Edmonton
Stauffer confirms that, in January, Ken Holland was told to sign Broberg and Holloway to contracts very quickly.

Sounds like Holland fell asleep. WOW
In January, Broberg was just starting to recover his game in the AHL after coming off a difficult start under Woodcroft and demanding a trade. Doubt they could have gotten his name on a contract even if they were motivated to do so.
 

SupremeTeam16

5-14-6-1
May 31, 2013
8,856
8,799
Baker’s Bay
Th
We're talking about this year. Broberg at $4.5m means you have to remove healthy players off of the current roster. And to what? Give a rookie a contract you never intended on giving him.

You seem stuck on this idea that Broberg was earmarked for top four ice on this current Oilers roster. That was never going to happen. He may have been penciled as Nurse's partner. But at the end of the day he's was likely averaging less than 15 minutes of ice a game. Less than Ceci and less than Kulak. He wasn't there yet.

At his cap hit, Broberg would be public enemy #1. There wouldn't be a supportive fanbase. There'd be a toxic, critical pushback to any sign of struggle that Broberg would have.
This is how I feel as well. Long term Broberg is probably the player you’d rather keep of the two but I think it’s a very real possibility if not a probability that Broberg would wilt under the scrutiny and pressure of living up to a contract he forced on the organization.

Holloway would still be under pressure but much less, and in an easier position. He knows he did the team dirty and he’ll be motivated to live up to that deal. Put him with good players, pump him and dump him in a year or two for more then the 3rd you’d get letting him walk.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad