Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | Broberg, Holloway and Ceci are Gone, Do We Add Another D Before Camp?

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
16,336
17,989
Vancouver
What's missing out of this analysis is Vince Dunn who I think greatly impacts Larsson's on ice results.
Dunn is definitely a great player more of an offensive driver. You see the hit in terms of Kraken goal scoring but not necessarily in their goal suppression numbers. Dunn played only 59 games this year so an even bigger role fell to Larsson in terms of top pairing role and responsibilities on the goal suppression side (again where the Kraken were above league average).

Larsson is a solid value contract all things considered with his time on ice, goal suppression work including key situational deployment. Of course that doesn't include positive intangibles of leadership, grit, and character which aren't necessarily measurable but valued by NHL management, coaching, and players.

EDIT: Just to add Borgen's icetime threshold was 22:51. Larsson had 18 games of over 25:00 icetime which reinforces the team's need to have him on the ice at critical situations and ability to do so. And missing his offensive driving d-partner for a 1/4 of the season cost Larsson offensive production results which likely at minimum catches Borgen's totals.

I've long felt there is a blindspot in some of the advance stat modelling that devalues goal suppression defensive defensemen. Helpful to overlay more information into the process to evaluate.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: McTonyBrar

Bryanbryoil

Pray For Ukraine
Sep 13, 2004
87,056
36,838
Stecher is definately a better puck mover but the other thing to consider is that Stecher is now going to have to deal with Nurses poor defenisve reads just like Ceci had to.
Predictability/being able to read you partner is huge especially when the time and space get taken away by good forechecking teams. Nurse is unpredictable, Ceci was more often than not just slow to make the play.
 

ManByng

Oilers cup 2025
Aug 4, 2009
5,264
596
Reykjavik, Iceland
Predictability/being able to read you partner is huge especially when the time and space get taken away by good forechecking teams. Nurse is unpredictable, Ceci was more often than not just slow to make the play.
Always had the feeling that the Oilers were not enthralled with the way Ceci and Kulak play defense? I believe Ty Emberson will get a legit shot and the Oilers, whether it's through a PTO contract or another trade, are not done shopping for a D with term.
 

Bryanbryoil

Pray For Ukraine
Sep 13, 2004
87,056
36,838
Always had the feeling that the Oilers were not enthralled with the way Ceci and Kulak play defense? I believe Ty Emberson will get a legit shot and the Oilers, whether it's through a PTO contract or another trade, are not done shopping for a D with term.
JJ and Bowman seem to move a lot faster than Holland did. Here's to hoping for a solid top 4 RHD being added and some speed and toughness to round out the forward lineup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ManByng

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
37,498
18,435
JJ and Bowman seem to move a lot faster than Holland did. Here's to hoping for a solid top 4 RHD being added and some speed and toughness to round out the forward lineup.
We'd still have to wait till the deadline. The problem is that almost every team will start the season with the hope that they will make the playoffs. Even Chicago will want to wait to see if they will be a seller.

Imo it makes sense to give Emberson a real shot
 
  • Like
Reactions: ManByng

BarDownBobo

Registered User
Oct 19, 2012
6,518
3,298
City of Champions
Yeah we're on the same page about Emberson, this line of replies was based on Lindstrom specifically. I asked why his name is so popular in this thread.

Nobody's been able to give a good reason why we should give Lindstrom a chance besides that he's 25 years old.
This post from @VeteranPresence in the last thread kinda scratches the surface of it for me at least:

The more I look at a guy like Gustav Lindstrom, the more I like him. Turns out Ducks didn't qualify him so he is now a UFA, but-

-39% OZ starts, so no push offensively, but he still put up 10 points in 46 games (17 point pace)
-xGA of 28.8, was only on the ice for 17 though
-0.947 on ice save percentage to lead the Ducks D, which is just goofy

6'2, 194, only 25 years old but a good skater who knows how to play in his end. We should be offering him a one-year deal easy, maybe even two years now that our D depth is depleted with Vinny and now likely Broberg moving on. If he shows out, there's your cheap partner for Nurse to make the combined cap hit of that pairing easier to swallow. If he doesn't, no problem, you just bury him in Bakersfield where we need RD too. I don't really see a downside here.

Add onto that the fact that he somehow ended up +12 on a Ducks team that had a goal differential of -91 on the season and it just keeps getting more and more intriguing to me at least. I don’t think he’s a sure figure solution by any means but when when you’re looking at filling in the right side behind Bouchard with some questions marks why not add one more card to the deck and see if you can strike gold. He’s a UFA so unless he’s holding out for more dollars/term right now the risk is essentially zero, if you bring him in and he doesn’t look the part it’s onto waivers and either gone or down to the AHL with a bury-able contract. His age is definitely appealing as well with the loss of Broberg, as he could be a bit of a long term solution if he hits.
 

guymez

The Seldom Seen Kid
Mar 3, 2004
34,356
14,847
I guess ceci > nurse
My point exactly though, many times during the year people bitch and complain about nurse on a play when ceci is off sniffing crayons and nurse covering for him yet still getting blamed
Nice misrepresentaion.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TheNumber4

Took a pill in Sbisa

2showToffoliIwascool
Apr 23, 2004
16,564
7,517
Australia
This post from @VeteranPresence in the last thread kinda scratches the surface of it for me at least:



Add onto that the fact that he somehow ended up +12 on a Ducks team that had a goal differential of -91 on the season and it just keeps getting more and more intriguing to me at least. I don’t think he’s a sure figure solution by any means but when when you’re looking at filling in the right side behind Bouchard with some questions marks why not add one more card to the deck and see if you can strike gold. He’s a UFA so unless he’s holding out for more dollars/term right now the risk is essentially zero, if you bring him in and he doesn’t look the part it’s onto waivers and either gone or down to the AHL with a bury-able contract. His age is definitely appealing as well with the loss of Broberg, as he could be a bit of a long term solution if he hits.

I appreciate the response but those numbers make me even less interested than I was before. Caved in defensively and bailed out by goaltending. Like a reverse-heater.
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
100,375
14,381
Somewhere on Uranus
Seravalli speculating potential Oiler UFA right shot market inquiries:
Shattenkirk is a guy I've mentioned before. 15:47 toi on a good playoff team in Boston. Big minute player previously on bad Ducks lottery teams including some versatility at PK. A one and done established NHL veteran with a career of top4 responsibilities is worth inquiring about.
Thought shattenkirk did not want to play in Canada?
 

McSuper

5-14-6-1
Jun 16, 2012
17,149
6,911
Halifax
Where did you hear this from?
I forget. Maybe one of the insider mention it or it couldn't been on Youtube from one of the Oilers posters. It was saying with the D add by Seattle he maybe be available and the Oilers have interest. So probably nothing, but it is why asked ask if anyone else heard anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bryanbryoil

Heavy Dee

Registered User
May 29, 2005
9,511
7,968
I wonder what it would take to get Andersson from the Flames. 2 years at 4.5 is crazy good value.

This is a future forecast move of course, as we approach the deadline. It's looking like if (and when) the Flames crash and burn that Rasmus will be for sale and that he will be the top RD available. So many have said that other teams will be much better set up than we will be.

I happen to think he is a great stylistic complement to Nurse, and I don't see other Dmen who could be available who compare. I'm not a huge expert on him but I have watched him and I like what I research. He seems similar to Ekholm actually in that he can look elite but will buckle under big minutes.

So should the trade cost be similar? I'd say marginally less, so maybe a 1st and a key prospect?
Would take a guy like Bo Akey and a high pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Positive

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
37,498
18,435
I am sure that would change if no American team wants him.

Terrible idea.
Idk if we are after a PTO stop gap guy he was quite good for us before. He wasn't just an offensive specialist for us.

Schultz could be interesting. He won a couple cups on a similar team to ours
 

guymez

The Seldom Seen Kid
Mar 3, 2004
34,356
14,847
Idk if we are after a PTO stop gap guy he was quite good for us before. He wasn't just an offensive specialist for us.

Schultz could be interesting. He won a couple cups on a similar team to ours
The version of Schultz we saw here was a very immature version of the player.
He had only played about 200 NHL games by the time he finished up as an Oiler.
I am curious as to how much his defensive play has evolved.
 

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
73,205
29,160
This post from @VeteranPresence in the last thread kinda scratches the surface of it for me at least:



Add onto that the fact that he somehow ended up +12 on a Ducks team that had a goal differential of -91 on the season and it just keeps getting more and more intriguing to me at least. I don’t think he’s a sure figure solution by any means but when when you’re looking at filling in the right side behind Bouchard with some questions marks why not add one more card to the deck and see if you can strike gold. He’s a UFA so unless he’s holding out for more dollars/term right now the risk is essentially zero, if you bring him in and he doesn’t look the part it’s onto waivers and either gone or down to the AHL with a bury-able contract. His age is definitely appealing as well with the loss of Broberg, as he could be a bit of a long term solution if he hits.

Yeah I would sign him.
 

Heavy Dee

Registered User
May 29, 2005
9,511
7,968
Every day that goes by....

He was signable July 1. It's almost Sept 1. His contract is determined at the ownership and president level. It's a bullshit story they were waiting for Bowman.

Let's see where this goes as Elliott would say.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad