Forgot About Drai
Dr Drai the Second
I agree with this thought, though Rackell doesn't move the needle enough to be worth moving that 19 year old.
Fair enough. Is there somebody *somewhat* avail you have in mind?
I agree with this thought, though Rackell doesn't move the needle enough to be worth moving that 19 year old.
Nick cousinsFair enough. Is there somebody *somewhat* avail you have in mind?
Is anyone saying we should trade him for a fourth liner?
I've actually said that they're both. Prospect depth is necessary for a competitive team to be sustainable. It offers a steady stream of players who can pitch in on ELCs and contribute for many years in the low end of their expected career earnings. Having an abundance of them gives you options in the trade market. It gives you leverage when the assets that you possess are highly valued.
When a team is in the early stages of building a sustainable prospect system, trading their only blue chip option would have a devastating impact.
I think a player in that ballpark doesn't take a blue chip prospect to acquire. If you're willing to pay that, you're going to run out of valuable assets very early in this process. Particularly when the asset your acquiring doesn't come with a ton of team control. Maybe one or two seasons before you're adding a couple million on the books just to retain them.
Realistically Philip Broberg might get you Rickard Rakell. Add a high pick and your foot's in the door with San Jose for Timo Meier. Both of these players are statistically regressing forwards who have two paths. Either a career rebound resulting in a substantial pay raise or a continued trend of poor production resulting in the death of the asset.
It's incredibly rare you'll see successful teams take those kinds of gambles IMO.
Those were the two obvious players I had in mind. If we're being realistic, this is the ballpark we're probably working with. Anyone younger than Meier is either unestablished or completely unavailable.To be fair, I brought up Rakell for broberg lol. Might have been a bad shout by me hahahah
Maybe we should be aiming higher, but the principle is still the same imo
I've actually said that they're both. Prospect depth is necessary for a competitive team to be sustainable. It offers a steady stream of players who can pitch in on ELCs and contribute for many years in the low end of their expected career earnings. Having an abundance of them gives you options in the trade market. It gives you leverage when the assets that you possess are highly valued.
When a team is in the early stages of building a sustainable prospect system, trading their only blue chip option would have a devastating impact.
I can’t believe we had:
mcdavid
Draisaitl
RNH
Hall
Eberle
we should be winning cups right now wow
our second line could have been our old top line?
why the hell did we destroy this
Considering Evan Bouchard is probably done with Bakersfield and probably at the top of our NHL RD depth chart in short order, I wouldn't bother counting him as a prospect at this point.Broberg isn't even the best D prospect in the system, let alone the only blue chip prospect.
This is the kind of logic the team likely followed for some 30 years prior to drafting Klefbom. Lack of ability to add depth from the draft resulted in the Oilers pulling in players from the UFA market to fill depth roles. It resulted in doozies like the Ference, Fayne, Nikitin and Sekera contracts just looking at defensemen.The Oilers have a middling prospect pool that isn't going to get better if they continue to be a playoff team going forward. The help isn't coming from there.
We need a 2nd pair LD. We also need to trade Jones or Lagesson. Our defense could be a real train wreck if Adam Larsson doesn't re-sign.Considering Evan Bouchard is probably done with Bakersfield and probably at the top of our NHL RD depth chart in short order, I wouldn't bother counting him as a prospect at this point.
Our current LD depth:
Nurse - untouchable
Klefbom - unknown
Russell - bottom pair
Lagesson - waiver eligible
Jones - waiver eligible
Broberg - blue chip
Samorukov - second pair ceiling
Niemelainen - bottom pair ceiling
Cairns - probably goes unsigned
To be fair, even in the world top 10 picks, top 4 Dman are HUGE wins, so I think you're jumping the gun a little bit when saying that is the worst case scenario.
I totally understand you like the prospect. A lot of people do. I think hes a decent prospect myself. But I do think since he is 19 and years away from being a meaningful contributor, he should be an asset that is dangled for the right guy. Maybe its Rakell, maybe its a better target, but I think he can be a key piece in a deal.
We need a defenseman that does a little more than just hit. Zadorov worries me. I wouldn't mind scooping a temporary upgrade in the off-season if the plan was to upgrade on the rental market. But I want to know 100% that Klefbom's done before they spend a dollar on the role.We need a 2nd pair LD. We also need to trade Jones or Lagesson. Our defense could be a real train wreck if Adam Larsson doesn't re-sign.
We need to set ourselves up for the present and future here. Chicago apparently doesn't want to qualify Zadorov at his cap hit. Anyone else intrigued by that possibility?
Nurse - Larsson/Bear
Zadorov - Larsson/Bear
Lagesson/Klefbom - Bouchard
Russell (spare)
Jones is traded or taken by Seattle. Broberg and Samurokov get a year in the AHL and get a call up when injuries set in.
We need a defenseman that does a little more than just hit. Zadorov worries me. I wouldn't mind scooping a temporary upgrade in the off-season if the plan was to upgrade on the rental market. But I want to know 100% that Klefbom's done before they spend a dollar on the role.
I also think that one or both of Jones or Lagesson are Oilers in the fall. Seattle's got better options at expansion and neither of those guys have any value right now.
Broberg isn't returning a player like those.Rakell would be an awful return for Broberg. We need a true 1st line core winger if we move him- Laine, Meier, Svechnikov, Marner, Boeser, etc
True. It's a big reason why I've come around on prospect of adding a guy like Jake Debrusk, assuming the Bruins are done with him.Every team in the league has guys that don't have much value. Holland needs to find a match. I agree that Seattle likely would prefer a forward from us. I actually wouldn't be surprised if they offer to take a cap dump from us, as we don't have anyone overly enticing that we need to make available to them unless Holland gets some trading done before the expansion draft.
This is why I question people who want a guy like Kadri or Wilson. The oilers already get the shaft when it comes to DOPS. Imagine what a guy like Kadri or Wilson would go through in Edmonton. Kassian gets a penalty for looking at some wrong, Kadri or Wilson would get the McSorley treatment and booted from the league lol.Kadri would be a good add. He can score, plays with an edge and pisses opposing players right off .
The problem is, he gets carried away and gets himself suspended when the team needs him the most...in the playoffs.
Weird because he's sure doing that now.Eberle couldn't hold the puck along the wall and take a hit. Less to a goal by Anaheim and everyone jumped on him.
Yup, the difference a good coach makes on a player. I think he lead to one of the Islander's goal in game one by winning a puck battle.Weird because he's sure doing that now.
Yup, the difference a good coach makes on a player. I think he lead to one of the Islander's goal in game one by winning a puck battle.
It's gonna be a triple H summer. Hall, Hyman, Hamilton Halak for good measure? Haha
Flat Cap Era....Broberg is worth a pile. Close to ready...entry deal.....Broberg isn't returning a player like those.
Ducks fans seemed to be okay with trading Rakell for a 1st and a depth prospect at one time. I can't imagine that we would need to include Broberg.
I know he is worth a pile. But the type of player you are asking for is still worth more.Flat Cap Era....Broberg is worth a pile. Close to ready...entry deal.....
I've come around in the past few days too on Debrusk. As long as we get a bad contract out when we bring him in.True. It's a big reason why I've come around on prospect of adding a guy like Jake Debrusk, assuming the Bruins are done with him.