Rumor: Rumors & Proposals: "Looking for a trade to happen, making stops along the way."

In the spirit of Cloned's poll threads, what is highest on your offseason Oilers wish list?


  • Total voters
    226
Status
Not open for further replies.

Anarchism

John Henry
May 23, 2019
4,024
1,130
northern alberta
DogHouse DeBrusk.

Skelletea sure put an emphasis on Broberg becoming two way effectively. It certainly cost him alot of his offense and his ice time. Hopefully this gives him a jump start in the A.
 

Little Fury

Registered User
Jun 21, 2006
18,137
7,442
Considering Evan Bouchard is probably done with Bakersfield and probably at the top of our NHL RD depth chart in short order, I wouldn't bother counting him as a prospect at this point.

Our current LD depth:

Nurse - untouchable
Klefbom - unknown
Russell - bottom pair

Lagesson - waiver eligible
Jones - waiver eligible

Broberg - blue chip
Samorukov - second pair ceiling
Niemelainen - bottom pair ceiling
Cairns - probably goes unsigned

A lot can happen in trades or free agents to shore up that eft side before Broberg even touches the ice in the NHL on a regular basis, so balking at using assets to improve the team now based on some future weakness is extremely overcautious.

This is the kind of logic the team likely followed for some 30 years prior to drafting Klefbom. Lack of ability to add depth from the draft resulted in the Oilers pulling in players from the UFA market to fill depth roles. It resulted in doozies like the Ference, Fayne, Nikitin and Sekera contracts just looking at defensemen.

My point stands. Hopefully the Oilers are going to be picking in the 20-32 slot in the draft for the foreseeable future, which is basically high second rounder territory. So the odds are the players who will fill the future depth spots have already been selected or will be traded for players who can. I haven't seen anything on Broberg to make him untouchable.

Fortunately this team is playoff calibre without the 'help' in all likelihood. So making permanent long-term decisions in a weak FA market and from poor trade position might be a bad strategy.

You'll always be in a "poor trade position" if you refuse to give up any actual pieces of value.
 

AT14C

Registered User
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2017
24
36
I can’t believe we had:

mcdavid
Draisaitl
RNH
Hall
Eberle

we should be winning cups right now wow

our second line could have been our old top line?

why the hell did we destroy this
and such a wonderful defence too....
 

LTIR

Registered User
Nov 8, 2013
27,598
14,810
I can’t believe we had:

mcdavid
Draisaitl
RNH
Hall
Eberle

we should be winning cups right now wow

our second line could have been our old top line?

why the hell did we destroy this
Whats so wow? We could have this next season too but it wont equate to a playoffs team let alone a cup if we dont add a top 4 D or #1 G.
 

moneygoalie31

Registered User
Jul 14, 2007
209
7
Doesn't that kind of speak to some flaws in the process that I'm talking about?

Can we even assume there is one at work at this point?
If not for the pause, perhaps AA gains traction with 97. Both have great speed 10 more games may have changed things.
 

LTIR

Registered User
Nov 8, 2013
27,598
14,810
If we were patient with our own development, we would have Nurse or Petry on the ice most of the game.
Both would have drowned without a legit top pairing D pushing them down to easier mins. Larsson was a great add just not at that price.. Chia should have milked NJ for atleast a 1st on top.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moneygoalie31

t0nedeff

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
9,985
4,198
I don't think people realize how much not having defenseman capable of getting pucks on net from the point effects our bottom 6. 4k/Kulikov/Larsson/Bear/Jones were all pretty terrible at creating shots for themselves to create chaos for the bottom 6 to get any goals and that has more to do why our bottom 2 lines did jack all year. You're basically asking guys incapable of finesse plays to cycle and create their own shots because of that. Nurse/Barrie/Bouchard were the only ones who showed the capability to make it easier for the bottom 6 and Bouchard played barely any games and Barrie played most of his minutes with the top 6. Having each pairing having one of Nurse/Bouchard/Hamilton on it would do wonders for 20-21's bottom 6 let alone if they actually upgrade it this off season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheNumber4

gordonhught

Registered User
Feb 18, 2009
14,524
13,503
Both would have drowned without a legit top pairing D pushing them down to easier mins. Larsson was a great add just not at that price.. Chia should have milked NJ for atleast a 1st on top.
I would have been a bit happier if it had been a second and Larsson for Hall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LTIR

McTedi

Registered User
Jul 16, 2008
13,206
6,790
Edmonton
I don't think people realize how much not having defenseman capable of getting pucks on net from the point effects our bottom 6. 4k/Kulikov/Larsson/Bear/Jones were all pretty terrible at creating shots for themselves to create chaos for the bottom 6 to get any goals and that has more to do why our bottom 2 lines did jack all year. You're basically asking guys incapable of finesse plays to cycle and create their own shots because of that. Nurse/Barrie/Bouchard were the only ones who showed the capability to make it easier for the bottom 6 and Bouchard played barely any games and Barrie played most of his minutes with the top 6. Having each pairing having one of Nurse/Bouchard/Hamilton on it would do wonders for 20-21's bottom 6 let alone if they actually upgrade it this off season.
If I have Hamilton, I immediately top pair him with Nurse. Those guys would play heavy minutes, 25ish. Resign Larrs and hope Klef comes back to form a good middle pair and then whatever with Bouchard for bottom, keep 4K for 7.
 

GOilers88

#FreeMoustacheRides
Dec 24, 2016
15,160
22,695
If I have Hamilton, I immediately top pair him with Nurse. Those guys would play heavy minutes, 25ish. Resign Larrs and hope Klef comes back to form a good middle pair and then whatever with Bouchard for bottom, keep 4K for 7.
Yeah I like 4K more than our own grown options in Jones and Lagesson. And I like Lags, too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad