Rule change idea: allow changes after an icing, but from the bench at the whistle

Kane One

Registered User
Feb 6, 2010
43,814
11,698
Brooklyn, New NY
As we all know, the defending team is not allowed to make a line change after an icing (except for injured players). What if you are allowed to make a substitution, but the replacement player starts by the red line?

The rule change to disallow line changes was made after the 2004-05 lockout so this isn’t some sacrilegious tradition, and you might think that this idea would reverse the benefits of more goals. However, this will cause a lot more randomness, and debates such as “should he have been taken off the ice” where you’d have to weigh the pros and cons of being short a player for a few seconds until the player makes it into the defensive zone.

Thoughts?
 

TKB

Registered User
Jun 12, 2010
1,141
428
Chicago
As we all know, the defending team is not allowed to make a line change after an icing (except for injured players). What if you are allowed to make a substitution, but the replacement player starts by the red line?

The rule change to disallow line changes was made after the 2004-05 lockout so this isn’t some sacrilegious tradition, and you might think that this idea would reverse the benefits of more goals. However, this will cause a lot more randomness, and debates such as “should he have been taken off the ice” where you’d have to weigh the pros and cons of being short a player for a few seconds until the player makes it into the defensive zone.

Thoughts?

You can't do that because you are "giving" the offending team 40 to 60 feet of free ice. Defending team wins the draw, blasts the puck down.
 

CaptainShark

Registered User
Sep 25, 2004
4,348
2,666
Fulda, Germany
Counter proposal:

Allow teams to change after an icing.

Instead of no line change, for every icing the other team gets a power-up-card. Once a team has been awarded 4 cards, that allows the team to employ a Bull on skates in the other teams zone for 1 minute at any point in the game. He can be used to set picks or screens… but if the Bull injures an opponents player, that’s a 2 minute penalty on the deploying team.

Randomness: check
Debates (even with PETA): check
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,616
6,139
with the allowed 2 lines pass, if I am down a goal late in the third, not sure if this is not something I would like to do having the option (if you decide to not change you can put someone at the red line after an icing....) instead of an penalty. If you win the draw and ice the puck, seem almost automatic your red line player will win the race and break it.
 

TheDawnOfANewTage

Dahlin, it’ll all be fine
Dec 17, 2018
12,870
18,987
As we all know, the defending team is not allowed to make a line change after an icing (except for injured players). What if you are allowed to make a substitution, but the replacement player starts by the red line?

The rule change to disallow line changes was made after the 2004-05 lockout so this isn’t some sacrilegious tradition, and you might think that this idea would reverse the benefits of more goals. However, this will cause a lot more randomness, and debates such as “should he have been taken off the ice” where you’d have to weigh the pros and cons of being short a player for a few seconds until the player makes it into the defensive zone.

Thoughts?

Why? Solves a problem that doesn’t need solving imo. Rule works as intended, icings are discouraged but not overly punished.
 

islesmb

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 14, 2007
766
614
Myrtle Beach, SC (from Bellmore)
As we all know, the defending team is not allowed to make a line change after an icing (except for injured players). What if you are allowed to make a substitution, but the replacement player starts by the red line?

The rule change to disallow line changes was made after the 2004-05 lockout so this isn’t some sacrilegious tradition, and you might think that this idea would reverse the benefits of more goals. However, this will cause a lot more randomness, and debates such as “should he have been taken off the ice” where you’d have to weigh the pros and cons of being short a player for a few seconds until the player makes it into the defensive zone.

Thoughts?
IMHO should be able to change after an icing. I hated this rule change personally.
 

Gregor Samsa

Registered User
Sep 5, 2020
4,051
4,601
Personally I’d rather see icing be a discretionary type of thing even if that means putting more judgement calls in the refs hands. A guy dumping the puck in a few feet behind center ice should be let go. Missed stretch passes or a guy panicking in his own zone and launching it down? Icing
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
15,937
10,637
Well this is certainly an idea somebody, someday, would eventually have...
 

dumbdick

Galactic Defender
May 31, 2008
11,715
4,139
They should add the alligator pit for sudden death like they had in rollergames.

That was f***ing boss.

 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad