Prospect Info: Round 1, Pick 13: Jett Luchanko, C, Guelph (OHL)

  • Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

FLYguy3911

Sanheim Lover
Oct 19, 2006
53,717
87,885
One interesting tidbit from Danny's PC is that he implied Luchanko would be a four year Junior player. I get tempering expectations, but he wasn't really pressed for that answer and he gave it anyway. In today's game, you pick this high in the draft, the expectation is your first rounder is knocking on the door in his D+2. Not that getting to the NHL first is the best indicator, but I'll bet barring a holdout, Buium will be in the NHL within two years.

there's a reason why he fell to 12 in the first place.
Can we apply this to Michkov last year or no?
 

Nabrules

Registered User
Nov 5, 2018
1,552
1,562
One interesting tidbit from Danny's PC is that he implied Luchanko would be a four year Junior player. I get tempering expectations, but he wasn't really pressed for that answer and he gave it anyway. In today's game, you pick this high in the draft, the expectation is your first rounder is knocking on the door in his D+2. Not that getting to the NHL first is the best indicator, but I'll bet barring a holdout, Buium will be in the NHL within two years.


Can we apply this to Michkov last year or no?
Not really. With the Russian Factor, the contract, and him ghosting some teams during draft week, it’s no that comparable.
 

Random Forest

Registered User
May 12, 2010
14,596
1,243
One interesting tidbit from Danny's PC is that he implied Luchanko would be a four year Junior player. I get tempering expectations, but he wasn't really pressed for that answer and he gave it anyway. In today's game, you pick this high in the draft, the expectation is your first rounder is knocking on the door in his D+2. Not that getting to the NHL first is the best indicator, but I'll bet barring a holdout, Buium will be in the NHL within two years.


Can we apply this to Michkov last year or no?
If Luchanko makes the WJC team next year and puts up 90+ points, I’d be shocked if he goes back to juniors the following year.

If either of those things don’t happen, I could see it. And at that point the pick would look quite disappointing.

I don’t follow junior transactions that closely: is Guelph supposed to be more competitive next year? Is there any chance he’s traded to a better team? And is he close to a lock for the WJC? I have to imagine he’s the type of player Canada would consider a lock given speed, versatility, and intangibles.
 

CerpinTaxt

Registered User
Apr 1, 2009
2,237
2,774
KY
The whole "other teams passed on him so there must be something we don't know" is so lazy. How many teams passed on Giroux? How many passed on Pastranak? Patrice Bergeron was a 2nd rd pick for crying out loud. Just cause a team passes on a player doesn't mean shit. The Flyers passed and admitted they think Buium is a good player. The drafted the need and not the talent and that is what pisses people off
 

Strawberry Fields

12x Calder Cup Champs
Sep 29, 2017
9,025
29,356
Central PA
The whole "other teams passed on him so there must be something we don't know" is so lazy. How many teams passed on Giroux? How many passed on Pastranak? Patrice Bergeron was a 2nd rd pick for crying out loud. Just cause a team passes on a player doesn't mean shit. The Flyers passed and admitted they think Buium is a good player. The drafted the need and not the talent and that is what pisses people off
I mean, a bonafide top dman is also a pretty big need.
 

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
37,904
157,675
Huron of the Lakes
After Celebrini, you can legitimately argue for all of Lindstrom, Demidov, Iginla, Catton, Parekh over Buium, even if I wouldn't necessarily. But it's not remotely crazy to just prefer one of them. You can even throw in Dickinson in that safer projection way.

So, really it's Levshunov, Sennecke, Yakemchuk, Silayev. 2 of those went top 3. I'd be pretty surprised if those don't all look bad in the years to come. Assuming they just "know something" is a cop out. Minnesota was so desperate for Buium they traded up 1 spot thinking the Flyers would take him (HAHA).

Jersey is the surprising team, since they're relatively competent, but I think they did the questionable process thing the Flyers did: there's real usage issues with another elite offensive defender. Except, they made the call that with Hamilton, L. Hughes, and Nemec. It's still bad, but it's a far cry from York, Drysdale, and Andrae.
 

Juicy Pop

BONK
Apr 26, 2014
9,425
4,830
Scranton, PA
Agreed. Just wondering why this kid was still available at 12. The way a lot of people see him on this board it means up to 8-10 teams passed on him.

Assuming that it's better to go with the players who have proven more, whereas he's a late riser who needs another great year to justify the pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hexxxy

Hexxxy

Registered User
Feb 25, 2017
542
509
The whole "other teams passed on him so there must be something we don't know" is so lazy. How many teams passed on Giroux? How many passed on Pastranak? Patrice Bergeron was a 2nd rd pick for crying out loud. Just cause a team passes on a player doesn't mean shit. The Flyers passed and admitted they think Buium is a good player. The drafted the need and not the talent and that is what pisses people off
is it lazy or is it reality? Fact is 12 teams passed on Buium and he was what the 5th or 6th D taken? The argument that teams passed on Giroux and Paternak is not sincere. 12 teams also passed on Luchanko; only one team passed on Nolan Patrick.

They viewed the talent and upside as equal. Hence the flyers went C, which Briere said he would do if the players were equal. My bet is Briere would have gone Dickinson or Catton had they been available. Buium was just not rated as highly as most casual observers here rated him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Don Nachbaur 26

Hexxxy

Registered User
Feb 25, 2017
542
509
Assuming that it's better to go with the players who have proven more, whereas he's a late riser who needs another great year to justify the pick.
this is the argument: Briere thinks he's bill bellichick level genius drafting an out of the box sleeper when all he drafted was a one year wonder and workout warrior. Not that I buy the argument but it seems some teams did sniff the late-developing vapors on Luchanko.
 

Jettany

Registered User
Feb 21, 2018
2,685
1,406
The whole "other teams passed on him so there must be something we don't know" is so lazy. How many teams passed on Giroux? How many passed on Pastranak? Patrice Bergeron was a 2nd rd pick for crying out loud. Just cause a team passes on a player doesn't mean shit. The Flyers passed and admitted they think Buium is a good player. The drafted the need and not the talent and that is what pisses people off
Lazy? Were they passed on or were drafted close to their pre draft ranking? Was G ranked 5-10 and fell? I don’t think that was the case.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
128,459
166,929
Armored Train
The trade up using the pick we got for moving down in the first to grab a defensemen makes no sense to me. You had basically the consensus #1 d fall to your laps and you passed on him for a guy you could have gotten like 10 picks later. If you really wanted him you could have taken Buium with the 12 then trade the 32 and another pick to move up to take Jett. Instead you reached on your first pick, traded the 32 to defer for another year, and then the asset you got for passing on the best d man in the draft was used to move up to draft... A lesser d man? Wtf

They aren't even thinking through the draft, there is no way they have any deeper long term plan
 

Jettany

Registered User
Feb 21, 2018
2,685
1,406
The trade up using the pick we got for moving down in the first to grab a defensemen makes no sense to me. You had basically the consensus #1 d fall to your laps and you passed on him for a guy you could have gotten like 10 picks later. If you really wanted him you could have taken Buium with the 12 then trade the 32 and another pick to move up to take Jett. Instead you reached on your first pick, traded the 32 to defer for another year, and then the asset you got for passing on the best d man in the draft was used to move up to draft... A lesser d man? Wtf
He was the 6th defenseman drafted? So did they actually pass on the best defenseman. That means 6 other teams blew it even more so. By drafting the same position but an inferior player. I’m not saying they shouldn’t have taken him. The question why didn’t others? If you believe he is the best defenseman in the draft doesn’t that perplex you a bit? And there is really no way, at all, to know when Luchenko would have been picked. Kinda a stretch to fabricate a trade as if it was a given.
 

Jettany

Registered User
Feb 21, 2018
2,685
1,406
TK is a good example. Ranked top 10 and dropped far. It was assumed everyone must know something.

They did not.
Are you sure he was supposed to have been a single digit pick. I really don’t remember that. I thought in the 15-22 range. But I could be wrong. Thought he was a late riser to that range also.
 

Random Forest

Registered User
May 12, 2010
14,596
1,243
Konecny did slip at the draft, hence the Flyers trading up to grab him. IIRC, he was ranked in the mid-teens, with some variation given concerns about his size, but he was not expected to last until 24.

But where his slippage was really evident was in the fact that he was considered a potential top 10 guy going into his draft year, given his production in his D-1 season. Barzal also slipped in a similar way, but he didn’t fall as far on draft day.

Pastrnak also had a similar fall in 2014. These were all players who were identified as potential lottery picks before their draft seasons who fell both during the season and on the draft floor despite strong production.

Anyone have an idea what they all had in common??
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BillDineen

Jettany

Registered User
Feb 21, 2018
2,685
1,406
Konecny did slip at the draft, hence the Flyers trading up to grab him. IIRC, he was ranked in the mid-teens, with some variation given concerns about his size, but he was not expected to last until 24.

But where his slippage was really evident was in the fact that he was considered a potential top 10 guy going into his draft year, given his production in his D-1 season. Barzal also slipped in a similar way, but he didn’t fall as far on draft day.

Pastrnak also had a similar fall in 2014.

Anyone have an idea what they all had in common??
I don’t remember that. I could swear he was a later riser. Not at all in the top 10 to start the year or midway when rankings come out. Yes fell from midteens or so to 24. But never a consideration in the top 10 I believe.


I just checked quick. Central scouting had him 24th mid 16th final. North American skaters.
 

WolfOfBroadStreet14

Registered User
Aug 15, 2020
639
901
After reading some of his draft reports, there are similarities to Barzals draft reports during his draft year. Albeit Barzal was projected a little higher. If he gets close to that ceiling I could certainly live with that.
 

Random Forest

Registered User
May 12, 2010
14,596
1,243
I don’t remember that. I could swear he was a later riser. Not at all in the top 10 to start the year or midway when rankings come out. Yes fell from midteens or so to 24. But never a consideration in the top 10 I believe.


I just checked quick. Central scouting had him 24th mid 16th final. North American skaters.

Bob McKenzie’s end of season list had him at #15 (McKenzie's Final 2015 Ranking: McDavid, Eichel and... - TSN.ca), and the pre-season list had him at 10 (2014-15 NHL Pre-Season Draft Rankings).

So my recollection was correct: he was a pre-season top ranked player, and fell slightly during the season to mid-teens… then even further on draft day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillDineen

Jettany

Registered User
Feb 21, 2018
2,685
1,406
After reading some of his draft reports, there are similarities to Barzals draft reports during his draft year. Albeit Barzal was projected a little higher. If he gets close to that ceiling I could certainly live with that.
Time will tell. the Flyers usually pick well in the first round. Minus a few, Patrick, o’brien, rubtsov. Even Provoro
One interesting tidbit from Danny's PC is that he implied Luchanko would be a four year Junior player. I get tempering expectations, but he wasn't really pressed for that answer and he gave it anyway. In today's game, you pick this high in the draft, the expectation is your first rounder is knocking on the door in his D+2. Not that getting to the NHL first is the best indicator, but I'll bet barring a holdout, Buium will be in the NHL within two years.


Can we apply this to Michkov last year or no?
If the defenseman let it be known he would only play for the wild. Then yes.

After reading some of his draft reports, there are similarities to Barzals draft reports during his draft year. Albeit Barzal was projected a little higher. If he gets close to that ceiling I could certainly live with that.
Time will tell. the Flyers usually pick well in the first round. Minus a few, Patrick, o’brien, rubtsov. Even Provoro
One interesting tidbit from Danny's PC is that he implied Luchanko would be a four year Junior player. I get tempering expectations, but he wasn't really pressed for that answer and he gave it anyway. In today's game, you pick this high in the draft, the expectation is your first rounder is knocking on the door in his D+2. Not that getting to the NHL first is the best indicator, but I'll bet barring a holdout, Buium will be in the NHL within two years.


Can we apply this to Michkov last year or no?
If the defenseman let it be known he would only play for the wild.
 

Jettany

Registered User
Feb 21, 2018
2,685
1,406
Bob McKenzie’s end of season list had him at #15 (McKenzie's Final 2015 Ranking: McDavid, Eichel and... - TSN.ca), and his pre-season list had him at 10 (2014-15 NHL Pre-Season Draft Rankings).

So my recollection was correct: he was a pre-season top ranked player, and fell slightly during the season… then even further on draft day.

Crazy difference between the 2 then. Central scouting was closer to 35 to start the year.

Time will tell. the Flyers usually pick well in the first round. Minus a few, Patrick, o’brien, rubtsov. Even Provoro

If the defenseman let it be known he would only play for the wild. Then yes.


Time will tell. the Flyers usually pick well in the first round. Minus a few, Patrick, o’brien, rubtsov. Even Provoro

If the defenseman let it be known he would only play for the wild.
This site to post is brutal from an iPad.
 

freakydallas13

Registered User
Jan 30, 2007
6,998
16,915
Victoria, BC
is it lazy or is it reality? Fact is 12 teams passed on Buium and he was what the 5th or 6th D taken? The argument that teams passed on Giroux and Paternak is not sincere. 12 teams also passed on Luchanko; only one team passed on Nolan Patrick.

They viewed the talent and upside as equal. Hence the flyers went C, which Briere said he would do if the players were equal. My bet is Briere would have gone Dickinson or Catton had they been available. Buium was just not rated as highly as most casual observers here rated him.
The wild traded up one spot because they were desperate to draft him, what should we think about that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLYguy3911

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Austria vs Turkey
    KNOCKOUT Austria vs Turkey
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $27,750.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Brazil vs Colombia
    Brazil vs Colombia
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $14,488.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Costa Rica vs Paraguay
    Costa Rica vs Paraguay
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $50.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad