DancingPanther
Foundational Titan
- Jun 19, 2018
- 35,388
- 74,185
Great pick. They just can't help themselves can they?
Thats Justin BraunFrom Elite Prospects Draft Guide
![]()
2023 Elite Prospects NHL Draft Guide
For a limited time only we’re offering 50% OFF on an annual Premium subscription. Don’t miss out!www.eliteprospects.com
![]()
His ceiling is Justin Braun from all i read. I wanted to say. My 2 year old is making typing miserabelThats Justin Braun
could do worse than a Coburn 2,0Serious question, is he Brayden Coburn 2.0?
Defense first, some puck handling skills, good outlet pass, but not projected to ever play the PP ... or am I missing something here?
Michkov is going to get Giroux’d by this dumbass team.Great pick. They just can't help themselves can they?
This seems contradictory; the "defensive specialist" with a 72 rating on offense and 49 on defense?From Elite Prospects Draft Guide
![]()
2023 Elite Prospects NHL Draft Guide
For a limited time only we’re offering 50% OFF on an annual Premium subscription. Don’t miss out!www.eliteprospects.com
![]()
I said to my wife after the Michkov pick that I was having trouble processing happiness about a hockey outcome.we are a strange people. our default reaction is misery.
yeah but they had Perreault at 9 too..
I definitely would have preferred Perreault here and that seems to be what everyone everywhere is saying. That being said, I really don't think this is a BAD pick. Perreault's ceiling is definitely higher but it also seems less likely he will make it there. If Bonk pans out as he should, even if he doesn't meet his top potential, he should still be a good second pair defenseman.yeah but they had Perreault at 9 too..
You do understand that, right?
and this is what "everyone/someofus" were saying, we could have done A LOT better. Perreault and Michkov would be a steal.
You add that to the prospects forwards and young players what we already have ...
Picking Bonk over Perreault is not a great move, we basically did what Arizona did at #5.I definitely would have preferred Perreault here and that seems to be what everyone everywhere is saying. That being said, I really don't think this is a BAD pick. Perreault's ceiling is definitely higher but it also seems less likely he will make it there. If Bonk pans out as he should, even if he doesn't meet his top potential, he should still be a good second pair defenseman.
Swinging for the fences is fine and it is early in the rebuild, but you need safe picks too. In a few years the Rags may have a steal and we have a bust, or Bonk could be a key component to a deep playoff run given his size and purported defensive prowess. It is said ad nauseum that players of Bonk's ilk are needed to make that deep run. I know on this board anyone over six feet is seen as just an old hockey dinosaur who doesn't fit in today's NHL, but look at teams that go deep, most of them have a player or two like Bonk (or what we hope Bonk, will be anyway) on their blueline.
100% with you and everyone else that if I am making that pick it is Perreault. But there's far worse outcomes than taking a guy that pretty much everyone agrees will be a good NHL defender over a guy who might be a better NHL forward.
I’m not either but the bottom line is they felt they had to add someone who projects out as a top 4D, because they just don’t feel they have them, and they’re actually more worried about that than their high end forwards.Based on Briere’s comments, it seems like they went with who they had as the Best Defender Available vs the Best Player Available. Not a fan of that approach.
I don't think this is a great move either, but it isn't the disaster people are making it out to be. Perreault all day long here. But, Perreault is an undersized player whose biggest issue sounds like his skating. I would take that risk at 22 every day of the week, shit I was wondering earlier this offseason why there wasn't more buzz around him at 7. But Bonk is definitely a safer pick and yes, if Bonk pans out we are good. If he is a good second pair defender in 3-4 years, that is a good thing. Obviously we want every pick to be a star but that isn't realistic and taking the safe pick doesn't mean it is the bad pick.Picking Bonk over Perreault is not a great move, we basically did what Arizona did at #5.
Perreault seem less likely to make it but if Bonk pans our we are good?
Anyway, it is what it is.
If they had taken Perrault, Dragecevic, Stenberg, Ritchie or Gulyayev we’d all be happier this morning. To me, that’s an L.Not in love with the pick, but it's not like they reached. Time will tell.
I understand your point. I'm ok with the pick based on the scouting reports. I kind of assumed with the second pick it would be a d-manIf they had taken Perrault, Dragecevic, Stenberg, Ritchie or Gulyayev we’d all be happier this morning. To me, that’s an L.