Speculation: - Roster/Trade Discussion Thread: Draft and FA addition | Page 67 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Speculation: Roster/Trade Discussion Thread: Draft and FA addition

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
I find it interesting that Robertson wants the moon from Dallas but also refuses a ludicrous contract from Seattle. Time to make a decision imo
With the amount of behind the scenes tampering type activities that go on these days(his agent is Brisson), he probably has a very specific destination in mind. Trying to strong arm his way to where he wants to go.
 
He's a 26 year old 45 goal / 100 pt player. Stepan went for a 7th OA.(not saying I'd do it for the current rangers team, but hes got plenty of hockey left in him)

He's 27 in a month's time. That's not old, and he'd be a great player to add if you were a team strong down the middle and at the beginning of a contention window. The Rangers are neither. Trading for him and then signing him to the contract he wants will both prevent the Rangers from re-stocking a pretty barren cupboard (as what resources we do have would likely go towards acquiring JR) AND do nothing in terms of changing the fortunes of this team (no young centers, HUGE holes in the D).

Making that move would stick the Rangers exactly where they DON'T want to be:

-Mired in the mediocrity zone (just making/just missing the playoffs).
-Anchored to a highly productive winger with flaws (rather than building around center depth).
-In a position where (you KNOW) Drury will start buying rentals again to try and sneak into the last playoff spot.

Robertson is a very good player for a team that is in a very different spot than the NY Rangers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mas0764
That Trocheck chatter really hit the back burner. Tomorrow I think we’ll see some action. Shit or get off the pot Drury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ail
Robertson is 50x better than anyone we will get at 5. But he wont really help us now

This. Robertson would be repeating the exact same mistake we made in signing Panarin, but Bread was better than JRob, cheaper than JRob, we didn't have to trade a haul to get Bread, and we had more young pieces in place when we signed Bread. It's a bad move from every possible angle.
 
Last edited:
I think his point is that it could be offered - perhaps PV is holding out hope it will be offered at some point. I hope not. I have zero faith in Drury and that is a stretch even for me to believe.
Drury would be canned tonight if he included it
 
This. Robertson would be repeating the exact same mistake we made in signing Panarin, but Bread was better that JRob, cheaper than JRob, we didn't have to trade a haul to get Bread, and we had more young pieces in place when we signed Bread. It's a bad move from every possible angle.
Agree largely except Robertson at $14M AAV is actually cheaper than when panarin signed. Panarin at 11.6M was 14.3% of NYR cap hit. $14M on $104M total cap is ~13%.
 
Let’s not forget McTavish is a distressed asset for Anaheim. Lebrun and Vince can tweet about the “sweepstakes” all they want
Yeah. I’d be ok with SCH or 26 for this kid. Any more, go blow chunks Beeker. We don’t need HIM. We need to get value in trades, preferably more, but at least equal.

I want a trade as much as the next fan. But, is it too much to ask for not a stupid one?
 
  • Like
Reactions: McRanger92
Feels like there is something else there

Robertson going from team to team in the NHL with this vibe:

Screenshot 2026-06-25 at 10.33.25 PM.png
 
Say the 5OA is on the table for Mactavish. What does ANA have to add for us to like that deal? Without their own 1st, it feels like we'd be getting a bunch of lesser parts than what we could get at #5
All three of their 2027 2nd round picks? :laugh:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad