Speculation: - Roster/Trade Discussion Thread: Draft and FA addition | Page 24 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Speculation: Roster/Trade Discussion Thread: Draft and FA addition

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
fine. sorry.
No worries, bud. There are a lot of personal attacks on players on these boards, eg. Mika and Laf as well, but that’s not my thing. Most of these players I know very little of off the ice. And frankly their lives are not my business.
 
I regret volunteering to mod that place some days.

Used to be my favorite part of the forum. Lately it's just been a circle... thing of those teams that are in favor right now. Those GMs can do no wrong. Their players are at maximum value always.

The rangers could have McDavid signed to a league minimum contract and people there would refuse to give a first round pick.

Its gotten absurd lately. There's lots of people on that board with little brother syndrome when it comes to the Rangers though
 


The asking price on Knies is sky high:

The Blackhawks did kick the tires on available top-six forwards. The Toronto Maple Leafs’ asking price for Matthew Knies was believed to be the No. 4 pick and one of the Blackhawks’ top players. I’m not sure who the Leafs asked for, but Frank Nazar or Anton Frondell seem possible. At that point, the Blackhawks are probably losing more than they’re getting.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: UnSandvich
I regret volunteering to mod that place some days.

Used to be my favorite part of the forum. Lately it's just been a circle... thing of those teams that are in favor right now. Those GMs can do no wrong. Their players are at maximum value always.

The rangers could have McDavid signed to a league minimum contract and people there would refuse to give a first round pick.
You mean you don’t think Trocheck has been overpaid, is a 3C, and is worth the 45th overall and change?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 80s Kid
Still looking at San Jose for Schneider with that late 1st and a good prospect. Bystedt or Musty. Outside chance of Anaheim

And I still think Columbus comes through with the deal for Trochek. 15th +.

Who knows what’s going on with Gavrikov.

We’ve seen countless 1st’s traded already.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chalfdiggity3


The asking price on Knies is sky high:

kinda leads me to believe that Drury had a shitload of calls regarding #5 & Lafren and he stood pat even if it's tempting to go for Knies. I read that he was interested in moving the #5 for Byram yesterday but opted out.
There isn't any reason for the Rangers to move the #5 unless you're moving down or back in the draft but it does still scare me that he was thinking about moving that #5 yesterday for just a roster player, I really like Byram as a LHD and think he would've created an insanely good first pair with Fox but the timing is off.
 


The asking price on Knies is sky high:


I'd like Knies but the price does seem insane, especially where he'd be on a team without Matthews, Nylander, Tavares etc.
If we are interested in him, this is where i think we should be looking at McTavish as a 'budget Knies' and reclaimation project that we can potentially get for much, much less. Different players, but i wouldn't be surprised if their output here in a 2nd line roll ended up about the same
 
Still looking at San Jose for Schneider with that late 1st and a good prospect. Bystedt or Musty. Outside chance of Anaheim

And I still think Columbus comes through with the deal for Trochek. 15th +.

Who knows what’s going on with Gavrikov.

We’ve seen countless 1st’s traded already.

Vince said the Gavrikov trade request was rubbish. Also said Laf isn’t being moved. For what that’s worth
 
If it is the Sabres, I'm doing whatever to get the 4th pick in the deal without the 5th pick being involved.

Trocheck + 26 for 4. If you consider valuation, the difference between picks 26 and 4 is the value of the 7th pick.

Is Trocheck's impact much different than a 2016 Derek Stepan? He was worth the 7th pick. I'm not saying that was a great trade for the Coyotes, clearly it wasn't, but I do not think it is that far off.

There may be an offsetting Rangers pick somewhere in there. The Rangers have 4 3rd rounders, use however many of those to get this over the top.
 
If it is the Sabres, I'm doing whatever to get the 4th pick in the deal without the 5th pick being involved.

Trocheck + 26 for 4. If you consider valuation, the difference between picks 26 and 4 is the value of the 7th pick.

Is Trocheck's impact much different than a 2016 Derek Stepan? He was worth the 7th pick. I'm not saying that was a great trade for the Coyotes, clearly it wasn't, but I do not think it is that far off.

There may be an offsetting Rangers pick somewhere in there. The Rangers have 4 3rd rounders, use however many of those to get this over the top.

4th pick is found money for Jarmo and he knows it’s. He just let a fan favorite walk. Gotta respond with something imo
 
My question is, what would you add to 5 to move up to 2? If you can get 4 without giving up 5 (move Tro for example) do you trade 4 and 5 for 2 and 9? Or 4, 5, 26 for 2 and 9? SJ would get 2 top 5 players in that deal. Just spitballing though
 
My question is, what would you add to 5 to move up to 2? If you can get 4 without giving up 5 (move Tro for example) do you trade 4 and 5 for 2 and 9? Or 4, 5, 26 for 2 and 9? SJ would get 2 top 5 players in that deal. Just spitballing though

Sounds like overcomplicating things. Is Stenberg that type of player?
 
My question is, what would you add to 5 to move up to 2? If you can get 4 without giving up 5 (move Tro for example) do you trade 4 and 5 for 2 and 9? Or 4, 5, 26 for 2 and 9? SJ would get 2 top 5 players in that deal. Just spitballing though
I would hope they keep 4&5. But I have a hard time seeing Trochek bringing back 4. But Davidson shit the bed with 4 already once so I guess anything is possible in this market.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mike14

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad