justonetime
Registered User
- Mar 13, 2009
- 603
- 230
I don't think it will necessarily spread out the defense the way you suggest, I just disagree there, but I can see where you're coming from--I just think it will lead to people fronting shots even harder in an effort to force shots from bad angles/below the circles so the goalies can still cover as much net as possible; and then the big goalies like Bishop and Rinne become even more valuable. But more shots from random spots = more goals is, like I said, arbitrary/artificial. If the only thing that really changes is the actual box score, is it really more exciting hockey? If our game vs. TB was 6-5 instead of lower, but it looked exactly the same, is the 'problem' solved? I'm not convinced.
To me, it's a combination of systems play, goalie equipment, and loose calling of interference. Changing the nets peripherally fixes #2, but I just think it's a no-no, like changing the rink dimensions; I'd much rather see advances in technology let the goalie gear be a bit more form-fitting so the percentage goaltenders have to work a little harder too. I don't have an answer as to how to truly work with the systems play; but you'll notice the highest scoring teams are those who aren't scared to take some offensive risks with things like centering passes and pinches, things that become turnovers, which gives coaches of less talented teams headaches because they don't have the talent to keep up with pond hockey. I WOULD like to see interference and obstruction called liberally like it was after the lockout. Promote flow, not just scoring.
Don't get me wrong, I"m not convinced the Kings roster is built for such a game, we're built for lockout era smash hockey, but you start promoting a game where the emphasis is on speed, skill, and exploiting open ice, and the rosters and player development will follow.
You are probably the most pleasant person to disagree with on these entire boards, I respect that.
![handclap :handclap: :handclap:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/applaud.gif)
Truth is none of use know exactly how it would play out, which is why the NHL typically tests major rule changes in lower leagues first. I just think the reality is the systems are not going to change, defense wins championships in just about every major US sport I can think of. Goalies are going to continue to get bigger and bigger, and even with goalie pad changes (which I support) the available net to shoot at is going to get smaller. Coaches are going to do whatever they can to prevent goals no matter what the rules are, and I don't see a way to change that.
I also think interference and holding is called a TON, which is part of the reason teams just collapse now and block shots, because you can't be physical with defending the player themself. Players have adapted to the new style interference rules and in my opinion it has not gone back to what it used to be pre-lockout. I also am not a fan of hockey where the majority of goals are scored on the power play, I would prefer to see more even strength scoring. The best way I see to do this is the nets.
As far as history, yes it changes things somewhat, but we already discount player stats from the 80's because of the era, ect ect. Goalie stats are all inflated to an all time high, which also doesn't compare to previous eras. Changing the size of the nets to me is very similar to when they changed the height of the mound in MLB in 1969, was a big deal then but today that's just how the game is played.