I believe this is how the ELC performance bonus stuff works:
If a guy like Panarin hits various bonuses, they get applied to the following season's cap.
Panarin is going to get a boatload of bonus money, so that will impact Chicago's 2016-17 cap.
It's not an issue for this season as he technically doesn't get the money until after the regular season concludes.
There is a cap cushion for bonus money, I believe if you exceed that it rolls over.
For 35+ contracts Im not sure if it need to be structured this way or if its a team option on if the bonus money counts in the following year (like Boston and Iginla with ~$4M counted against the following years cap)
Because he was drafted in 2014? A lot of players rise in their draft+1 year alone, and Sanheim's just completed his draft+2 season. Dylan Larkin was drafted 15th in the same draft. Kyle Connor was drafted 17th (the same position as Sanheim) last year and is expected to win the Hobey Baker this year. Draft position means way way less than how a player's performed and developed since being drafted.
Whether it's worth trading all that for Sanheim is another issue, but if you're going to debate it, pointing to his draft position is a rather weak argument.
I understand player value can rise based on performance. On here its shiney new toy to the nth degree.
Its expected if you area CHL player your numbers will go up in the next two years post draft like Sanheim had. But there are TONS of players who did that but there is little correlation to that and NHL success.
lets look at the 2014 draft:
Ekblad
Reinhart
Draisatl
Bennet
Nylander
Ehlers
Pasternick
Larkin
Fabbri
McCann
all have done more--in a redraft they likely still get drafted before he does.
the issue I have in a redraft he gets picked maybe 8-12. around where Buffalo is picking now.
In terms of trade value
ROR+McGinn=Zads+Girgs+Compher+2nd
vs
top 10 pick+2nd+Pysyk for Sanheim