Speculation: Roster Speculation, 2018 Off-Season

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jame

Registered User
Sep 4, 2002
52,673
9,037
Florida
I'd have been thrilled with 11 and the 2 seconds.

All that cap space, a top flight wing to grow with the actual group in the future PLUS PLUS?

Are you kidding?

Go propose Wahlstron and 2 2s for RoR on the main board and see how hard they laugh at you.

Cap space for what? You’ve made it clear we can’t sign free agents...
 
  • Like
Reactions: SECRET SQUIRREL

Sabre the Win

Joke of a Franchise
Jun 27, 2013
12,949
5,566
theScore app says other peices were involved but they have no idea what they were. The basis of the trade was Pac to Islanders, Islanders pick to Buffalo, ROR to Montreal with other peices involved.

Montreal better have a +++ on that 1st for ROR
 

joshjull

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
79,619
42,485
Hamburg,NY
That sportsnet article doesn’t line up with the line of thinking that Botts is looking for a Mike Richards type of trade as a baseline
It doesn’t really line up with reporting over the weekend.

LA was in on MaxPac. But because he was looking to get a max extension before the trade it fell apart. LA then went back to Kovy and were willing to go to 3 years. This was playing out from Friday to Saturday. San Jose may or may not have been involved with an other attempt to get MaxPac and it supposedly fell apart for the same reasons as with LA. Much less confirmation on that one though.

Does anyone actually think Lou and the Isles were were in the middle of this mess that eventually led to MaxPac switching agents?
 

sabrebuild

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
10,517
2,770
Pittsburgh
I'd have been thrilled with 11 and the 2 seconds.

All that cap space, a top flight wing to grow with the actual group in the future PLUS PLUS?

Are you kidding?

Go propose Wahlstron and 2 2s for RoR on the main board and see how hard they laugh at you.

C’mon. Take any credibility you want to have on this subject and shoot it into the moon. This flies in the face of every argument you have made.
 

Jame

Registered User
Sep 4, 2002
52,673
9,037
Florida
Does anyone actually think Lou and the Isles were were in the middle of this mess that eventually led to MaxPac switching agents?

Considering that Lou has been doing everything possible to keep Tavares, and Tavares lack of a top winger for years has been a sore spot for the organization.... I think yes, he had to be "in" in one way or another.

But having 2 guys who could theoretically been top 5 on his board fall in his lap.... would change anyone's thought process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doug Prishpreed

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,814
39,844
Rochester, NY
What I got out of that article is the Habs wouldn’t give up the 3rd but were hoping to trade MaxPac for a pick they could hopefully use to get ROR. But the trade of MaxPac didn’t work out. What the pick would have been and everything else after seems like pure speculation.

Sure, but the article did speculate on a package of picks and not any players or prospects like Mete.

The article didn't paint a great picture about what Montreal was offering back as they had no interest in trading the 3rd overall pick for O'Reilly.

I think it was wishful thinking from those that want to see O'Reilly traded but are afraid that Botterill might have moved him for a handful of picks and that's it.

Only time will tell if O'Reilly is moved what comes back.

Personally, this article isn't giving me confidence that they will improve the team over the next year or two if they move O'Reilly.

It may be a step back in the short term with the hope that picks turn into players down the road.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doug Prishpreed

OkimLom

Registered User
May 3, 2010
15,584
7,022
Would people here be ok with Dobson/Wahlstrom, Mete/Danault, two 2nds? I'm assuming that is what would have to be offered by MTL if they're retaining their lottery pick.

The trade fell apart because of the way the draft happened. If the draft goes down the way the mock drafts went, then we aren't picking one of Dobson or Wahlstrom. If the draft goes down with one of them reaching the #10 spot, then they are picking that one and we would get the #11 pick. It's very apparent Lou valued grabbing at least one of the top 10 talents, but it fell apart when he was presented with 2 top 10 picks. You're looking at picking someone from a tier below, and then the 2 2nds. I doubt Mete/Danault would be up for trade availability, otherwise they would be used in a trade package instead of getting a 1st.

I'd have been thrilled with 11 and the 2 seconds.

All that cap space, a top flight wing to grow with the actual group in the future PLUS PLUS?

Are you kidding?

Go propose Wahlstron and 2 2s for RoR on the main board and see how hard they laugh at you.

Wahlstrom would not be the player selected by Buffalo. The reason the trade didn't go down is BECAUSE Wahlstrom was available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SECRET SQUIRREL

Shootica

Registered User
Jan 17, 2013
681
421
Utica, NY
It doesn’t really line up with reporting over the weekend.

LA was in on MaxPac. But because he was looking to get a max extension before the trade it fell apart. LA then went back to Kovy and were willing to go to 3 years. This was playing out from Friday to Saturday. San Jose may or may not have been involved with an other attempt to get MaxPac and it supposedly fell apart for the same reasons as with LA. Much less confirmation on that one though.

Does anyone actually think Lou and the Isles were were in the middle of this mess that eventually led to MaxPac switching agents?

It doesn't make any sense for the Islanders either. LW is probably their strongest position, they have no need for Patches especially at that price.

The more I read this article, the more it sounds like Montreal leaked some information to improve Bergevin's image.
 

sincerity0

Registered User
Dec 23, 2016
1,970
740
The Athletic reported that Devan Dubnyk was asked to update his 12 team NTC. Assuming Buffalo isn’t on this list, is there any interest there if we miss out on Hutton/Bernier? 32 and has a $4.33m hit for the next 3 years.
 

Icicle

Think big
Oct 16, 2005
6,055
1,007
The takes here are hilarious. All we know is that Botterill DIDN'T take some deal that wasn't good enough, written from some Canada homering website that painting some steal that he missed out on because of two leaps of speculation, is enough to be a criticism of how cheap Botterill is? geez-- anything flies. The guy's only trades are an absolute steal for Scandella, a 5th for Wilson, and a 6th for a 6th, and somehow Botterill is some cheap no-good GM..
 

sabrebuild

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
10,517
2,770
Pittsburgh
The trade fell apart because of the way the draft happened. If the draft goes down the way the mock drafts went, then we aren't picking one of Dobson or Wahlstrom. If the draft goes down with one of them reaching the #10 spot, then they are picking that one and we would get the #11 pick. It's very apparent Lou valued grabbing at least one of the top 10 talents, but it fell apart when he was presented with 2 top 10 picks. You're looking at picking someone from a tier below, and then the 2 2nds. I doubt Mete/Danault would be up for trade availability, otherwise they would be used in a trade package instead of getting a 1st.



Wahlstrom would not be the player selected by Buffalo. The reason the trade didn't go down is BECAUSE Wahlstrom was available.

Let’s suppose that Wahlstrom is the pick available. Even then the trade breaks down to a whole lot of lottery.

I mean if Wahlstrom actually turns into a scoring winger version of O’Reilly, league value wise, that would be a home run in the land of a Pasta or Connor pick. Super rare.

Giving up an all star player, under contract, with 4-5 good years left, for meh lottery tickets is bananas.
 

sabrebuild

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
10,517
2,770
Pittsburgh
The takes here are hilarious. All we know is that Botterill DIDN'T take some deal that wasn't good enough, written from some Canada homering website that painting some steal that he missed out on because of two leaps of speculation, is enough to be a criticism of how cheap Botterill is? geez-- anything flies. The guy's only trades are an absolute steal for Scandella, a 5th for Wilson, and a 6th for a 6th, and somehow Botterill is some cheap no-good GM..

Nobody is shitting on Botts for theoretically talking about this deal.

The bones are concerning, but whatever.

People are shitting on the fact that certain posters here are in favor of such a poo poo platter.
 

joshjull

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
79,619
42,485
Hamburg,NY
The Athletic reported that Devan Dubnyk was asked to update his 12 team NTC. Assuming Buffalo isn’t on this list, is there any interest there if we miss out on Hutton/Bernier? 32 and has a $4.33m hit for the next 3 years.
I’d be interested but would he be interested in us?
 

OkimLom

Registered User
May 3, 2010
15,584
7,022
Let’s suppose that Wahlstrom is the pick available. Even then the trade breaks down to a whole lot of lottery.

I mean if Wahlstrom actually turns into a scoring winger version of O’Reilly, league value wise, that would be a home run in the land of a Pasta or Connor pick. Super rare.

Giving up an all star player, under contract, with 4-5 good years left, for meh lottery tickets is bananas.

For me, I don't mind the 1st pick, and if it turned into Wahlstrom, then great. I don't mind that piece, but that's not a piece that drives me to trade ROR for. I want/need more from Montreal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sabrebuild

sabrebuild

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
10,517
2,770
Pittsburgh
For me, I don't mind the 1st pick, and if it turned into Wahlstrom, then great. I don't mind that piece, but that's not a piece that drives me to trade ROR for. I want/need more from Montreal.

Oh I’m not against that pick as a piece. But then something bigger needs to come with it, not a couple of 2nds
 
  • Like
Reactions: OkimLom

OkimLom

Registered User
May 3, 2010
15,584
7,022
The takes here are hilarious. All we know is that Botterill DIDN'T take some deal that wasn't good enough, written from some Canada homering website that painting some steal that he missed out on because of two leaps of speculation, is enough to be a criticism of how cheap Botterill is? geez-- anything flies. The guy's only trades are an absolute steal for Scandella, a 5th for Wilson, and a 6th for a 6th, and somehow Botterill is some cheap no-good GM..

3rd for Beaulieu
Kane for San Jose choice of 1st or 2nd round pick + Draft pick + O'Regan

The guy's only trades are an absolute steal for Scandella, a 5th for Wilson, and a 6th for a 6th, and somehow Botterill is some cheap no-good GM..

Absolute "steal" for Scandella - loved the trade, but he created two holes that he didn't fill.

Traded a 5th for Wilson - Would've liked to see more of these moves during the year, but the result of this trade could end up as a nothing trade. We could see Wilson walk, after playing a throwaway year. Potentially could feel like an asset thrown away.

a 6th for a 6th - A 6th this year for what will probably be a later 6th round pick next year, without getting another asset. It's really a nothing trade, that people complain about because, it really makes no sense to make this move. If there's someone you like in the 6th round next year, then make the trade next year. You lost an asset in this draft for no reason. it just looks bad.

There's just not enough to go on to determine what kind of GM he is, but that goes for both ways. There's not enough evidence to show me whether I should trust him and his judgement in trades/drafts or not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad