Total respect to this post. Appreciate a lot of your points...
I will definitely give Roy SOMEWHAT of a pass given this terrible roster Lou has saddled him (and us all with). But last in the entire league in PP and PK (and not just last, but historically low numbers)? Guys not giving 100%? Lots of giveaways and guys out of position?
No way it's this bad if Trotz is still coach.
I mean if you're almost blackballed from the NHL and finally get another shot like Roy just did...This is the job you do? It's bad bad - Not just "Lou gave me a bad roster" bad.
If the guys were just in correct positions and playing hard I could get a little more excited, but the 7-1 defeat at home to the Sabres is a microcosm of the coaching job Roy has done. You shouldn't lose 7-1 to any team in the league - Much less one who hadn't won in weeks.
Roy might be a decent GM one day, but right now not going to reward a guy who is failing at his current job. I think that's a horrible precedent to set.
I mean we can try a "retread" (athough that name alone has such lackluster connotations), but I haven't seen one suggested that I can get excited about.
McPhee was a joke in Washington (anyone remember Erat for Foresberg), and got handed a dream situation in Vegas. Honestly tons of average GMs would've had success with just picking the best players available from each expansion list or taking picks/prospects to not take a certain prospect.
To me I just don't want any GM who's been out of the league for more than 1 season. I like the idea that anyone we hire has been working non-stop the last few years so they are both experienced and up on all the data/league talk/etc.
Not for a second do I think that analytics should be the driving force in decision making, but I'm just saying it should be in the pool of things that help guide organizational decisions.
Believe me if I had only one thing that I would prioritize it would be SCOUTING. I would kill for a President/GM who tries to create the best scouting department in the NHL. That alone would boost this team's chances of winning the most. Lord knows that many average coaches have won a Cup when standing behind the bench of a very talented team.
Not sure what you mean by "compete," but this current roster could not compete for a Cup no matter who was behind the bench. And I'm only interested in competing for Cups. Not trying to make the playoffs as an 8 seed and get bounced in 6 games. We've done that plenty already.
100% agree on this. Resigning either or both, or letting them walk for nothing, are both GM malpractice.