GDT: Roster Building XVIII: Trade Deadline Week!

Status
Not open for further replies.

whiskers

Registered User
Aug 2, 2018
426
635
again why? why did he need to trade Webber , I liked him , as he's huge and a defensive D there was no rush to trade him , for a 6th ? kidding me what u gonna do with a 6th ? Should have waited for Webber to play in the AHL first. We would and needed a stay at home defensemen , like one that's stays in front of the net , how many goals were scored with opponent player was alone with our goalie , I believe + 40%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dogbazinho

User13452

Registered User
Jan 7, 2022
2,586
3,798
again why? why did he need to trade Webber , I liked him , as he's huge and a defensive D there was no rush to trade him , for a 6th ? kidding me what u gonna do with a 6th ? Should have waited for Webber to play in the AHL first. We would and needed a stay at home defensemen , like one that's stays in front of the net , how many goals were scored with opponent player was alone with our goalie , I believe + 40%.
Assuming he told the canes he wasn’t gonna sign
 

Joe McGrath

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
18,540
39,960
again why? why did he need to trade Webber , I liked him , as he's huge and a defensive D there was no rush to trade him , for a 6th ? kidding me what u gonna do with a 6th ? Should have waited for Webber to play in the AHL first. We would and needed a stay at home defensemen , like one that's stays in front of the net , how many goals were scored with opponent player was alone with our goalie , I believe + 40%.
You mean the 23 year old who wasn’t planning on signing here?
 

spockBokk

Registered User
Sep 8, 2013
7,490
18,978
again why? why did he need to trade Webber , I liked him , as he's huge and a defensive D there was no rush to trade him , for a 6th ? kidding me what u gonna do with a 6th ? Should have waited for Webber to play in the AHL first. We would and needed a stay at home defensemen , like one that's stays in front of the net , how many goals were scored with opponent player was alone with our goalie , I believe + 40%.
Why whine about a getting a pick for a guy that wasn’t going to sign?
 

Nikishin Go Boom

Russian Bulldozer Consultent
Jul 31, 2017
23,708
55,334
again why? why did he need to trade Webber , I liked him , as he's huge and a defensive D there was no rush to trade him , for a 6th ? kidding me what u gonna do with a 6th ? Should have waited for Webber to play in the AHL first. We would and needed a stay at home defensemen , like one that's stays in front of the net , how many goals were scored with opponent player was alone with our goalie , I believe + 40%.
Im not sure why it matters but we likely weren’t going to offer him much like Montgomery. If defenders aren’t good skaters, they don’t have much of a shot with us
 

Brock Anton

flames #badnwagon
Nov 8, 2009
21,528
12,355
Westerly, RI
I got a feeling it’s going to be something like Duclair and Vatrano as our trade deadline deals. Which wouldn’t be a bad thing.
I'm fine with Duclair as a smaller move for some secondary scoring, but I have zero interest in Vatrano.

As I've said before, I'd have more interest if he were actually a rental. Don't want him on the books next year at $4M.
 

TheReelChuckFletcher

Former TheRillestPaulFenton; Harverd Alum
Jun 30, 2011
10,970
25,027
Raleigh and Chapel Hill, NC
Kakko, prospects, and a 1st for Guentzel seems like a mistake waiting to happen, especially because the Rangers won't have cap room to extend him short of an expensive Goodrow cap dump. I'll say if that's the price, let them do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tryamw
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad