Speculation: Roster building thread XLIX ”U Can’t Always get what U Want”

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
U is the 22nd letter of the alphabet.

N(eed) is the 14th letter.

The trade is for the 8th pick.

It’s either (2+2)+(2+2) =8th pick OR

22-14= 8th pick

(can’t get what U want, but what you N(eed))
 
Figure if they are trying to get it done now and multiple pieces are involved, a 1st rounder is in play. I want to say Vancouver because they need to turn it around and contend, but the draft is in Vancouver. Toronto doesn't have a 1st either but Nylander makes a lot of sense.

Buffalo, Dallas, Edmonton and Arizona make lots of sense. The @Edge comment about an under 25 y/o was vague enough to be about our centerpiece or the other team's. We know the pieces at this point: Keller, JP & Luch, 1st rounders, etc.

My guess is Arizona as the partner.
 
I already did that one a few pages back you slowpoke
COL1_EN_32.png
 
On record in this thread as not wanting Puljujarvi.

This is exactly the type of low-risk, buy-low move the Rangers have excelled at in the Sather/Gorton years. IMO, Pool Party could easily be a Zherdev type, or a Brassard type, but the risk is worth it. None of the Vesey/Strome/Namestnikov trio has the goal-scoring potential Pool Party does.
 
The talk of a big trade, calculated risk where the price makes people sigh makes me think like 2oa for Drai.

I dunno I’m trying to catch up and make sense of the general hysteria
The only sigh in that scenario would be uttered by Gorton after @Amazing Kreiderman did an Arya Stark leap from the lower bowl and plunged a Clapper speedskate into his belly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad